On the Existence of Ordered Organic Adlayers at the Cu(111)/Electrolyte Interface
Source abstract
Abstract
We have reinvestigated the behavior of a Cu(111) electrode in pure and cinchonidine containing aqueous 0.1 M HClO4 solution by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and in situ electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). In contrast to previous publications by Wan et al. (Langmuir 2000, 19, 1958-1962 and references cited therein) on Cu(111) in pure 0.1 M HClO4 which claimed an adsorbate-free Cu(111) surface in the entire potential range, we have found a highly ordered hexagonal adsorbate structure with a (4 x 4) unit cell, which is stable in the potential range from hydrogen evolution at -350 to -150 mV (RHE). The adsorbate-free (1 x 1) Cu(111) surface is only visible in a fairly small potential range from -150 to +50 mV. A disordered surface structure is formed at more positive potentials which is interpreted by adsorption of an oxygen-containing species. Furthermore, the formation of a highly ordered cinchonidine adlayer on Cu(111) in 0.1 M HClO4 as reported by Wan et al. (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14300-14301) could not be reproduced here. In fact, the similarity of all structures reported by Wan et al. for a great variety of different organic adlayers on Cu(111) in HClO4 solution including cinchonidine with the (4 x 4) superstructure found here already in pure HClO4 solution (i.e., without organic solute) casts serious doubts on the validity of those previous results by Wan et al. in general.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Surface Chemistry and Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Wegelerstrasse 12, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Dretschkow · 2003 · 321
2. Wan L.-J. · Langmuir · 1997 · 13 · 7179
3. Wang D. · Surf. Sci. · 2001 · 489 · L57210.1016/S0039-6028(01)01317-6 ↗
4. Han M.-J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 11276
5. Wei G.-X. · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 520 · L632
6. Wang D. · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 5138
7. Wang D. · Surf. Sci. · 2001 · 478 · L32610.1016/S0039-6028(01)00965-7 ↗
8. Xu Q.-M. · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 517 · 58
9. Xu Q.-M. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2002 · 41 · 341110.1002/1521-3773(20020916)41:18<3411::AID-ANIE3411>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
10. Xu Q.-M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 124 · 14301
11. Yin X.-L. · Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 531 · 230
12. Wang D. · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 1962
13. Han M.-J. · Chem. Lett. · 2003 · 32 · 703
14. Wang D. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 8478
15. Brisard G. M. · Langmuir · 1995 · 11 · 223010.1021/la00006a060 ↗
16. Chu Y.-S. · 1997
17. Wilms M. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1999 · 70 · 365010.1063/1.1149971 ↗
18. Inukai J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 1003410.1021/jp982952l ↗
19. Broekmann P. · Surf. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 6 · 91610.1142/S0218625X99000974 ↗
20. Friebel D. · 2004
21. Henderson M. A. · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 2002 · 46 · 30810.1016/S0167-5729(01)00020-6 ↗
22. Obliers B. · 2004
23. Lukas S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 114 · 1013010.1063/1.1370936 ↗
24. Safarowsky C. · 2004