journal article·2011-12-20

Carbon Nanotube-Based Robust Steamphobic Surfaces

Ila Badge, Sunny Sethi, Ali Dhinojwala

Langmuir· Volume 27· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

The wetting behavior of a surface under steam condensation depends on its intrinsic wettability and micrometer or nanoscale surface roughness. A typical superhydrophobic surface may not be suitable as a steamphobic surface because of the nucleation and growth of water inside the valleys and thus the failure to form an air-liquid-solid composite interface. Here, we present the results of steam condensation on chemically modified nanostructured carbon nanotube (CNT) mats. We used a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process to modify the intrinsic wettability of nanostructured CNT mats. The combination of low surface energy achieved by PECVD and the nanoroughness of the surface provides a mechanism to retain the superhydrophobicity of the CNT mats under steam condensation. The ability to withstand steam temperature and pressure for as long as 10 h implies the remarkably improved stability of the superhydrophobic state of the surface. The thermodynamic calculations carried out using a unit cell model clearly explain the steamphobic wetting behavior of the surface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Polymer Science, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325-3909, United States

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. McHale G. · Analyst · 2004 · 129 · 28410.1039/b400567h ↗
2. Quéré D. · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2005 · 68 · 249510.1088/0034-4885/68/11/R01 ↗
3. Wang S. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 342310.1002/adma.200700934 ↗
4. McHale G. · Langmuir · 2004 · 20 · 1014610.1021/la0486584 ↗
5. Lafuma A. · Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 45710.1038/nmat924 ↗
6. Wenzel R. N. · Ind. Eng. Chem. · 1936 · 28 · 98810.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
7. Cassie A. B. D. · Trans. Faraday Soc. · 1944 · 40 · 54610.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
8. Narhe R. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 07610310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.076103 ↗
9. Daniel S. · Science · 2001 · 291 · 63310.1126/science.291.5504.633 ↗
10. Varanasi K. K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 09410110.1063/1.3200951 ↗
11. Zheng Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 08410610.1063/1.2887899 ↗
12. Dorrer C. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 15910.1002/adma.200701140 ↗
13. Lau K. K. S. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 170110.1021/nl034704t ↗
14. Chen C.-H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 17310810.1063/1.2731434 ↗
15. Sethi S. · Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 431110.1021/la9001187 ↗
16. Laguardia L. · Macromol. Symp. · 2007 · 247 · 29510.1002/masy.200750133 ↗
17. Coulson S. R. · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 628710.1021/la0001676 ↗
18. He P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 04310710.1063/1.1846957 ↗
19. Coulson S. R. · Chem. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 203110.1021/cm000193p ↗
20. Hare E. F. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1954 · 58 · 23610.1021/j150513a011 ↗
21. Dietz C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 03310410.1063/1.3460275 ↗
22. Barber A. H. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 18610310.1103/PhysRevLett.92.186103 ↗
23. Marmur A. · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 834310.1021/la0344682 ↗