Mesoscale Structures in the Adlayer of A-B2 Heterogeneous Catalysis
Source abstract
Abstract
This article explores the adsorbate distributions in the adlayer for a model A-B 2 system of heterogeneous catalysis, i.e., A + 1 / 2 B 2 → AB, via kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations. In comparison with our previous work on the A-B model (Sun, F.; Huang, W.; Li, J. Structural characteristics of the adlayer in heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 153, 87–92), species B 2 here brings about significant new features due to its special site requirement during adsorption and desorption and a different stoichiometric ratio in reactions. The effects of various kinetic processes on the adsorbate distribution are found to be similar to those in the A-B system; that is, both desorption and diffusion (besides adsorption) processes contribute to the adlayer uniformity while reactions account for clustering. However, desorption exhibits a stronger role than diffusion in homogenizing the adlayer, which is opposite to the finding in the previous A-B model. Under a fixed partial pressure, different reaction and desorption rate constants can lead to steady states with different dominant species, which has not been observed in the A-B system. The regime of species B poisoning shrinks as well, leading to the spreading of the coexisting regime, in comparison with the A-B model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Research Center for Mesoscience
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.254.5039.175010.1126/science.254.5039.1750 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.270.5236.60810.1126/science.270.5236.608 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.278.5345.193110.1126/science.278.5345.1931 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.105947810.1126/science.1059478 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.108390910.1126/science.1083909 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.106288310.1126/science.1062883 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.46222610.1063/1.462226 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp981285t10.1021/jp981285t ↗
9. 10.1021/jp992779910.1021/jp9927799 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.04610610.1103/PhysRevE.77.046106 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.17830110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.178301 ↗
12. 10.1016/0167-5729(94)90009-410.1016/0167-5729(94)90009-4 ↗
13. 10.1016/0021-9991(75)90060-110.1016/0021-9991(75)90060-1 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.255310.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2553 ↗
15. Somorjai G. A. · 197210.1149/1.2404463 ↗
16. Satterfield C. N. · 1981
17. Boudart M. · 198410.1515/9781400853335 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.453410.1103/PhysRevA.46.4534 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.45681810.1063/1.456818 ↗
20. 10.1016/0021-9517(90)90264-K10.1016/0021-9517(90)90264-K ↗
21. 10.1016/0167-5729(91)90004-H10.1016/0167-5729(91)90004-H ↗
22. 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00120-010.1016/S0920-5861(99)00120-0 ↗
23. Li J. · 201410.1007/978-3-642-41790-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.coche.2016.07.00810.1016/j.coche.2016.07.008 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.01410.1016/j.ces.2016.07.014 ↗
26. 10.1080/0360245860806808610.1080/03602458608068086 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.83310.1103/PhysRevLett.66.833 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.03.01910.1016/j.ces.2016.03.019 ↗
29. 10.1002/aic.69025031610.1002/aic.690250316 ↗
30. 10.1002/aic.69031041510.1002/aic.690310415 ↗