journal article·2020-07-28Open access

Self-Assembly of Model Amphiphilic Peptides in Nonaqueous Solvents: Changing the Driving Force for Aggregation Does Not Change the Fibril Structure

Alessandra Del Giudice, Axel Rüter, Nicolae Viorel Pavel, Luciano Galantini, Ulf Olsson

Langmuir· Volume 36· Issue 29

Abstract

-dimethylformamide, were found to form fibrillar aggregates with the same β-sheet structure as in water but with slightly smaller cross-sectional sizes. However, the gel-like texture, the slow relaxation in dynamic light scattering experiments, and a correlation peak in the small-angle X-ray scattering pattern highlighted enhanced interfibril interactions in the nonaqueous solvents in the same concentration range. This could be ascribed to a higher effective volume of the aggregates because of enhanced fibril growth and length, as suggested by light scattering and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy analyses. These effects can be discussed considering how the solvent properties affect the different energetic contributions (hydrophobic, electrostatic, and hydrogen bonding) to fibril formation. In the analyzed case, the decreased hydrogen bonding propensity of the nonaqueous solvents makes the hydrogen bond formation along the fibril a key driving force for peptide assembly, whereas it represents a nonrelevant contribution in water.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le A. Moro 5, Rome 00185, Italy

Division of Physical Chemistry, Lund University, Lund SE-22100, Sweden

Funding

Sapienza Universit? di Roma · Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-04511510.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045115 ↗
2. 10.1101/cshperspect.a03386010.1101/cshperspect.a033860 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.106318710.1126/science.1063187 ↗
4. 10.1039/b915923c10.1039/b915923c ↗
5. 10.1021/ja027993g10.1021/ja027993g ↗
6. 10.1098/rsfs.2017.003010.1098/rsfs.2017.0030 ↗
7. 10.1021/bi00483a00110.1021/bi00483a001 ↗
8. 10.1039/c0sm01218a10.1039/c0sm01218a ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cocis.2018.02.00910.1016/j.cocis.2018.02.009 ↗
10. 10.1039/c2sm25671a10.1039/c2sm25671a ↗
11. 10.1038/386259a010.1038/386259a0 ↗
12. 10.1021/la804175h10.1021/la804175h ↗
13. 10.1021/la501632410.1021/la5016324 ↗
14. 10.1002/cphc.20190112610.1002/cphc.201901126 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10051007012710.1007/s100510070127 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.19125019810.1073/pnas.191250198 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0388610.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03886 ↗
18. 10.1021/la00030a00410.1021/la00030a004 ↗
19. 10.1016/s1359-0294(97)80094-510.1016/s1359-0294(97)80094-5 ↗
20. 10.1039/c6cp03332f10.1039/c6cp03332f ↗
21. 10.1021/ma102624b10.1021/ma102624b ↗
22. 10.1039/c8cp02745e10.1039/c8cp02745e ↗
23. 10.1021/jp902860a10.1021/jp902860a ↗
24. 10.1021/la800942n10.1021/la800942n ↗
25. 10.1002/psc.133510.1002/psc.1335 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.07.00410.1016/j.bbapap.2018.07.004 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0300510.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03005 ↗
28. 10.1021/nn404237f10.1021/nn404237f ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0230310.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02303 ↗
30. Lemmon E. · 2020
31. 10.1107/s002188980301277910.1107/s0021889803012779 ↗
32. 10.1107/s002188981201431810.1107/s0021889812014318 ↗
33. 10.1016/s0001-8686(97)00312-610.1016/s0001-8686(97)00312-6 ↗
34. SasView, version 5.0.0, 2019 http://www.sasview.org/.
35. 10.1007/bf0069393710.1007/bf00693937 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.167815310.1063/1.1678153 ↗
37. 10.1039/c9sm02244a10.1039/c9sm02244a ↗
38. 10.1051/jphys:019760037012014610010.1051/jphys:0197600370120146100 ↗
39. 10.1021/ma302148610.1021/ma3021486 ↗
40. Glatter O. · 1982
41. 10.1073/pnas.95.5.226710.1073/pnas.95.5.2267 ↗
42. 10.1002/anie.20110535610.1002/anie.201105356 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.06.00510.1016/j.bbapap.2005.06.005 ↗
44. Berne, B.; Pecora, R. Dynamic Light Scattering: With Applications to Chemistry, Biology, and Physics; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY (USA), 1976; p 376.
45. 10.1063/1.173099510.1063/1.1730995 ↗
46. 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90086-910.1016/0022-2836(77)90086-9 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.44107110.1063/1.441071 ↗
48. 10.1021/ja00877a00910.1021/ja00877a009 ↗
49. Burgess J. · 1978
50. 10.1139/v73-59910.1139/v73-599 ↗
51. 10.1021/je00103a00910.1021/je00103a009 ↗
52. Lide D. R. · 1994
53. 10.1021/j100454a01610.1021/j100454a016 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.07.05910.1016/j.cplett.2012.07.059 ↗
55. Yaws, C. L.; Richmond, P. C. Thermophysical Properties of Chemicals and Hydrocarbons; Yaws, C. L., Ed. William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, 2009; Chapter 21, pp 686–781.10.1016/B978-081551596-8.50026-2 ↗
56. Hansen C. M. · 200710.1201/9781420006834 ↗
57. Rüter, A.; Olsson, U. Slow kinetics in a model peptide system, 2020. in preparation.
58. Rüter, A.; Kuczera, S.; Stenhammar, J.; Zinn, T.; Narayanan, T.; Olsson, U. Tube to ribbon transition in a self-assembling model peptide system, 2020. in preparation.10.1039/D0CP03204B ↗
59. Neutron, X-rays and Light: Scattering Methods Applied to Soft Condensed Matter, 1st ed. Lindner, P., Zemb, T., Eds. Elsevier: North Holland, Amsterdam, 2002; p 552.
60. Hamid, M. K.; Rüter, A.; Kuczera, S.; Olsson, U. An isothermal titration calorimetry study of peptide self-assembly, 2020. in preparation.