journal article·2020-06-02Open access

Using Faraday Waves to Measure Interfacial Tension

Yuk Man Lau, Jerry Westerweel, Willem van de Water

Langmuir· Volume 36· Issue 21

Abstract

We use Faraday waves to measure interfacial tension σ between two immiscible fluids, with an interest in (ultra)low values of σ. The waves are excited by vertically oscillating the container in which the fluids reside. Using linear stability theory, we map out the accessible range of interfacial tensions. The smallest value (σmin ≈ 5 × 10–4 N/m) is limited by the joint influence of gravity and viscous dissipation. A further limitation is posed by the greatest accelerations that can be realized in a laboratory. We perform experiments on a water–dodecane interface with an increasing concentration of a surfactant in the water layer that decreases the interfacial tension into the ultralow domain [σ = (10–6 N/m)]. Surprisingly, the smallest measured wavelength is larger by a factor of 2 than that predicted for vanishing σ. We hypothesize the effect of transport of the surfactant in the fluid flow associated with the waves.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation · Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes · Fluid Dynamics and Mixing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics, Delft University of Technology and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands

Funding

Shell Technology Centre Amsterdam

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/la061928t10.1021/la061928t ↗
2. 10.1063/1.176993710.1063/1.1769937 ↗
3. Seiffert, A. In Drops and bubbles in interfacial research; Möbius, D., Miller, R., Eds. Elsevier, 1989; pp 187–238.
4. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0470210.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04702 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.04110.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.041 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0007610.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00076 ↗
7. 10.1017/S002211209400381210.1017/S0022112094003812 ↗
8. 10.1002/andp.1913346080810.1002/andp.19133460808 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.109711610.1126/science.1097116 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.01190510.1103/PhysRevE.83.011905 ↗
11. 10.1016/0001-8686(70)80001-X10.1016/0001-8686(70)80001-X ↗
12. 10.1007/s00348000011910.1007/s003480000119 ↗
13. 10.1017/jfm.2015.35210.1017/jfm.2015.352 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.316010.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3160 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.18450410.1103/PhysRevLett.94.184504 ↗
16. 10.1017/S002211209800108610.1017/S0022112098001086 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.162912810.1063/1.1629128 ↗
18. 10.1017/S002211200200132510.1017/S0022112002001325 ↗
19. 10.1017/S002211200800277210.1017/S0022112008002772 ↗
20. 10.1017/S002211200400160010.1017/S0022112004001600 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.01.01010.1016/j.jcp.2018.01.010 ↗
22. 10.1017/S002211200400245910.1017/S0022112004002459 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.267010.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2670 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.55910.1103/PhysRevE.60.559 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.404310.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4043 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.501010.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5010 ↗
27. 10.1017/S002211200300589510.1017/S0022112003005895 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.03620910.1103/PhysRevE.72.036209 ↗
29. 10.1017/S002211200900755110.1017/S0022112009007551 ↗
30. 10.1017/S002211209400364210.1017/S0022112094003642 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00348-008-0608-z10.1007/s00348-008-0608-z ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0082110.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00821 ↗
33. 10.1021/je000245r10.1021/je000245r ↗
34. Miche M. · Ann. Ponts Chaussees · 1944 · 144 · 25
35. 10.1063/1.160293610.1063/1.1602936 ↗