Solution Structure Effects on the Properties of Electric Double Layers with Surface Charge Regulation Assessed by Density Functional Theory
Source abstract
Abstract
The structure of electrolyte solutions in electric double layers is primarily determined by the solvent, despite the fact that it is usually neutral and not subject to Coulombic interactions. The number of solvent molecules in a typical electrolyte solution may be significantly greater that the number of ions. Hence, the charged species compete for space with a much larger number of neutral molecules, which has a strong effect on the density distributions near charged surfaces. Even for very dilute electrolyte solutions, the density profiles resemble liquidlike structure, which is entirely due to the presence of the dense solvent. Our work demonstrates that the solvent structural effect strongly couples to the surface chemistry, which governs the charge and potential. We argue that a comprehensive statistical-mechanical approach, such as classical density functional theory that explicitly includes all solution species, in combination with a surface charge regulation condition at the interface, provides an excellent approach for describing charged interfaces. It allows for revealing important physical features and includes non-Coulombic contributions such as ionic and surface solvation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Micro-Engineered Materials and Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
Funding
U.S. Air Force Academy · Basic Energy Sciences
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Dukhin, S. S. In Surface and Colloid Science; Matijevic, E., Ed. Wiley Interscience: New York, 1974; Chapter 1, pp 1–49.
2. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0361110.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03611 ↗
3. 10.1002/andp.1853165060310.1002/andp.18531650603 ↗
4. 10.1051/jphystap:01910009004570010.1051/jphystap:019100090045700 ↗
5. 10.1051/anphys/19170907012910.1051/anphys/191709070129 ↗
6. 10.1080/1478644040863418710.1080/14786440408634187 ↗
7. Debye P. · Phys. Z. · 1923 · 24 · 185
8. 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90019-110.1016/0022-5193(71)90019-1 ↗
9. 10.1016/0001-8686(95)00263-P10.1016/0001-8686(95)00263-P ↗
10. 10.1039/f1976720284410.1039/f19767202844 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.09.00310.1016/j.jcis.2005.09.003 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.140498810.1063/1.1404988 ↗
13. 10.1021/la962132510.1021/la9621325 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.47928010.1063/1.479280 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp984099w10.1021/jp984099w ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.22830110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.228301 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.43510.1103/PhysRevLett.79.435 ↗
18. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/42/42410610.1088/0953-8984/21/42/424106 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cocis.2011.04.01210.1016/j.cocis.2011.04.012 ↗
20. 10.1002/9780470141519.ch110.1002/9780470141519.ch1 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.168084110.1063/1.1680841 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.43663510.1063/1.436635 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.44128210.1063/1.441282 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.45564310.1063/1.455643 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.37.345610.1103/PhysRevA.37.3456 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.46195410.1063/1.461954 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.46666410.1063/1.466664 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.04830110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.048301 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.08410.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.084 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.500506010.1063/1.5005060 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.501209010.1063/1.5012090 ↗
32. 10.1021/ct300115610.1021/ct3001156 ↗
33. 10.1002/bbpc.19240018210.1002/bbpc.192400182 ↗
34. Evans, R. In Fundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids; Henderson, D., Ed. Marcel Dekker: New York, 1992; Chapter 3, pp 85–175.
35. 10.1002/aic.1071310.1002/aic.10713 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.98010.1103/PhysRevLett.63.980 ↗
37. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/6/06310210.1088/0953-8984/22/6/063102 ↗
38. Archer, A. J.; Chacko, B.; Evans, R. Spinodal decomposition in a Lennard-Jones fluid. arXiv:1706.08744v1, 2017.
39. Morse P. · 1953 · 1
40. Hill T. L. · 1986
41. 10.1063/1.44046810.1063/1.440468 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.184543110.1063/1.1845431 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.03150310.1103/PhysRevE.68.031503 ↗
44. Barthel J. M. G. · 1998
45. 10.1021/jp073703c10.1021/jp073703c ↗
46. 10.1063/1.503704410.1063/1.5037044 ↗
47. Sandia National Laboratories Tramonto Software: https://software.Sandia.Gov/tramonto/.
48. 10.1016/S0001-8686(96)00307-710.1016/S0001-8686(96)00307-7 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0022-0728(68)80206-210.1016/S0022-0728(68)80206-2 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.00410.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.004 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.00510.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.005 ↗
52. 10.1021/la103286610.1021/la1032866 ↗
53. 10.1021/cr60130a00210.1021/cr60130a002 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.47597310.1063/1.475973 ↗
55. 10.1021/jp046382310.1021/jp0463823 ↗
56. 10.1021/la202544510.1021/la2025445 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.45400110.1063/1.454001 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.167612110.1063/1.1676121 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.46330110.1063/1.463301 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.221794310.1063/1.2217943 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.486299010.1063/1.4862990 ↗
62. Blum, L.; Henderson, D. In Fundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids; Henderson, D., Ed. New York, 1992; Chapter 6, pp 239–276.
63. 10.1016/0009-2614(82)83119-910.1016/0009-2614(82)83119-9 ↗