Polymer Diffusion in the Interphase Between Surface and Solution
Source abstract
Abstract
Total internal reflection fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (TIR-FCS) is applied to study the self-diffusion of poly(ethylene glycol) solutions in the presence of weakly attractive interfaces. Glass coverslips modified with aminopropyl- and propyl-terminated silanes are used to study the influence of solid surfaces on polymer diffusion. A model of three phases of polymer diffusion allows to describe the experimental fluorescence autocorrelation functions. Besides the two-dimensional diffusion of adsorbed polymer on the substrate and three-dimensional free diffusion in bulk solution, a third diffusion time scale is observed with intermediate diffusion times. This retarded three-dimensional diffusion in the solution is assigned to the long-range effects of solid surfaces on diffusional dynamics of polymers. The respective diffusion constants show Rouse scaling (D ∼ N–1), indicating a screening of hydrodynamic interactions by the presence of the surface. Hence, the presented TIR-FCS method proves to be a valuable tool to investigate the effect of surfaces on polymer diffusion beyond the first adsorbed polymer layer on the 100 nm length scale.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Ionic liquids properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences, Adlerstr. 32, 47798 Krefeld, Germany
Funding
Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung · Ministerium f?r Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0953-8984/23/3/03510410.1088/0953-8984/23/3/035104 ↗
2. 10.1021/ma00122a01110.1021/ma00122a011 ↗
3. 10.1002/polb.1066910.1002/polb.10669 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat98010.1038/nmat980 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.17800110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.178001 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00396-015-3802-610.1007/s00396-015-3802-6 ↗
7. 10.1021/ma300439k10.1021/ma300439k ↗
8. 10.1021/la903705p10.1021/la903705p ↗
9. 10.1021/ma901404g10.1021/ma901404g ↗
10. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.10452710.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104527 ↗
11. 10.1038/3501816610.1038/35018166 ↗
12. 10.1021/la503667c10.1021/la503667c ↗
13. 10.1021/ma011352910.1021/ma0113529 ↗
14. 10.1021/ma102493910.1021/ma1024939 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.02.01310.1016/j.jsb.2009.02.013 ↗
16. 10.1039/b718132a10.1039/b718132a ↗
17. 10.1364/OE.17.02114910.1364/OE.17.021149 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.498623510.1063/1.4986235 ↗
19. Thompson N. L. · 2002 · 33710.1007/0-306-47057-8_6 ↗
20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu32810.1093/bioinformatics/btu328 ↗
21. 10.1038/nmeth.120810.1038/nmeth.1208 ↗
22. Teraoka I. · 200210.1002/0471224510 ↗
23. 10.1529/biophysj.104.05388410.1529/biophysj.104.053884 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.10810110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.108101 ↗
25. 10.1021/la103212d10.1021/la103212d ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.10610210.1103/PhysRevLett.88.106102 ↗
27. Walla P. J. · 201410.1002/9783527683505 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74748-110.1016/S0006-3495(03)74748-1 ↗
29. 10.1021/ma062104l10.1021/ma062104l ↗
30. 10.1021/j100702a02210.1021/j100702a022 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.24110.1103/PhysRevLett.79.241 ↗
32. 10.1021/ma960749n10.1021/ma960749n ↗
33. 10.1021/ma00203a04710.1021/ma00203a047 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.48020610.1063/1.480206 ↗
35. 10.1051/jphys:01990005101009150010.1051/jphys:019900051010091500 ↗
36. 10.1021/ma950668b10.1021/ma950668b ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.191110.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1911 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.06830110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.068301 ↗
39. 10.1021/ja407396v10.1021/ja407396v ↗
40. 10.1021/nn404903910.1021/nn4049039 ↗
41. 10.1088/0953-8984/17/2/R0110.1088/0953-8984/17/2/R01 ↗