journal article·2020-05-26

New Insights into Dewetting of Cu Thin Films Deposited on Si

Dipali Sonawane, Abhik Choudhury, Praveen Kumar

Langmuir· Volume 36· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Very thin metallic films are susceptible to dewetting upon thermal excursions, resulting in fragmentation and hence loss of structural integrity. Herein, 15 to 55 nm thick Cu films deposited on a Si substrate were isothermally annealed at 400 to 700 °C inside a scanning electron microscope operating in high-vacuum mode and the ensuing dewetting behavior was studied. The in situ observations revealed that the induction time before the void nucleation varied with film thickness as per a power-law with an exponent of 4, and the activation energy for both the void nucleation and the growth was close to the activation energy for surface diffusion. Hillock formation was observed to be a prerequisite for void nucleation in relatively thicker films. To complement the experimental observations, phase-field simulations incorporating a grain boundary grooving model were performed, which showed excellent agreement with the experimental observations. This validates the surface diffusion-controlled, grain boundary grooving-driven mechanism for void nucleation and dewetting of Cu films deposited on Si.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Block Copolymer Self-Assembly

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India

Funding

Indian National Science Academy · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Brandon R. · 1966
2. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.02710.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.027 ↗
3. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/24/24560810.1088/0957-4484/22/24/245608 ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-15504810.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-155048 ↗
5. 10.1007/bf0322143310.1007/bf03221433 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.33768910.1063/1.337689 ↗
7. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/48/48530610.1088/0957-4484/19/48/485306 ↗
8. 10.1002/pssa.20143175510.1002/pssa.201431755 ↗
9. 10.1039/c2cs35040h10.1039/c2cs35040h ↗
10. 10.1364/oe.19.02630810.1364/oe.19.026308 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.40310.1016/j.msea.2006.02.403 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat262910.1038/nmat2629 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.233662910.1063/1.2336629 ↗
14. 10.1364/oe.21.01834410.1364/oe.21.018344 ↗
15. 10.1038/srep1479010.1038/srep14790 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.05510.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.055 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.279215710.1115/1.2792157 ↗
18. 10.1147/rd.394.046510.1147/rd.394.0465 ↗
19. 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90329-510.1016/0001-6160(89)90329-5 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.155617810.1063/1.1556178 ↗
21. 10.1116/1.186194310.1116/1.1861943 ↗
22. 10.1103/physrevb.72.11542510.1103/physrevb.72.115425 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.152507010.1063/1.1525070 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.170867610.1063/1.1708676 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.11.03710.1016/j.susc.2006.11.037 ↗
26. 10.1007/bf0267332710.1007/bf02673327 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.312744210.1063/1.3127442 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.489869110.1063/1.4898691 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.07010.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.070 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.08.22910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.08.229 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.00210.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.002 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.06210.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.062 ↗
33. 10.1088/1361-6544/aa5e5d10.1088/1361-6544/aa5e5d ↗
34. 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90941-410.1016/0040-6090(92)90941-4 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.01910.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.019 ↗
36. 10.1103/physreve.85.02160210.1103/physreve.85.021602 ↗
37. 10.1016/0039-6028(72)90229-410.1016/0039-6028(72)90229-4 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11664-018-6275-910.1007/s11664-018-6275-9 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.166305410.1063/1.1663054 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.172274210.1063/1.1722742 ↗
41. Porter D. A. · 2009
42. 10.1016/s0026-2714(99)00177-810.1016/s0026-2714(99)00177-8 ↗