journal article·2019-12-17Open access

Does the Solvent in a Dispersant Impact the Efficiency of Crude-Oil Dispersion?

Jay C. Fernandes, Niti R. Agrawal, Futoon O. Aljirafi, Geoffrey D. Bothun, Alon V. McCormick, Vijay T. John, Srinivasa R. Raghavan

Langmuir· Volume 35· Issue 50

Abstract

Dispersants, used in the mitigation of oil spills, are mixtures of amphiphilic molecules (surfactants) dissolved in a solvent. The recent large-scale use of dispersants has raised environmental concerns regarding the safety of these materials. In response to these concerns, our lab has developed a class of eco-friendly dispersants based on blends of the food-grade surfactants, soy lecithin (L) and Tween 80 (T), in a solvent. We have shown that these "L/T dispersants" are very efficient at dispersing crude oil into seawater. The solvent for dispersants is usually selected based on factors like toxicity, volatility, or viscosity of the overall mixture. However, with regard to the dispersion efficiency of crude oil, the solvent is considered to play a negligible role. In this paper, we re-examine the role of solvent in the L/T system and show that it can actually have a significant impact on the dispersion efficiency. That is, the dispersion efficiency can be altered from poor to excellent simply by varying the solvent while keeping the same blend of surfactants. We devise a systematic procedure for selecting the optimal solvents by utilizing Hansen solubility parameters. The optimal solvents are shown to have a high affinity for crude oil and limited hydrophilicity. Our analysis further enables us to identify solvents that combine high dispersion efficiency, good solubility of the L/T surfactants, a low toxicity profile, and a high flash point.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation · Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact · Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881, United States

Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, United States

Funding

Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Clayton J. R. · 1993
2. National-Research-Council · 2005
3. McNutt M. K. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2012 · 109 · 2026010.1073/pnas.1112139108 ↗
4. 10.5670/oceanog.2016.7510.5670/oceanog.2016.75 ↗
5. 10.1351/pac19997101002710.1351/pac199971010027 ↗
6. 10.1016/s1353-2561(99)00061-410.1016/s1353-2561(99)00061-4 ↗
7. 10.1021/es103838p10.1021/es103838p ↗
8. 10.1080/15287394.2011.60679710.1080/15287394.2011.606797 ↗
9. 10.1080/15287394.2013.82139610.1080/15287394.2013.821396 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.02810.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.028 ↗
11. 10.1021/la502312n10.1021/la502312n ↗
12. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.01210.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.012 ↗
13. 10.1016/s0269-8579(86)80030-210.1016/s0269-8579(86)80030-2 ↗
14. Fiocco, R.; Lessard, R.; Canevari, G.; Becker, K.; Daling, P. The impact of oil dispersant solvent on performance. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1995, Vol. 1252, pp 299–309.10.1520/STP15397S ↗
15. Hansen C. M. · 2000
16. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.05.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.05.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/s1353-2561(02)00072-510.1016/s1353-2561(02)00072-5 ↗
18. 10.4236/jep.2015.6605710.4236/jep.2015.66057 ↗
19. 10.1021/ef040005810.1021/ef0400058 ↗
20. Morrison I. D. · 2002