Transition and Stability of Copolymer Adsorption Morphologies on the Surface of Carbon Nanotubes and Implications on Their Dispersion
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the adsorption morphologies as well as stability and transitions of a commercial dispersant copolymer (BYK 9076) on the surface of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were studied using Fourier transform infrared and UV-vis spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, and electron microscopy techniques. The results show that the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in ethanol does not increase continuously with increasing copolymer/CNT ratio, which is correlated with the adsorption morphologies of the copolymer on the CNT surface. At a ratio of copolymer/CNT below 0.5, the morphology is random, shifting to a hemimicelle structure at a ratio from 0.5 to 1.0 while at ratios above 1.0, a cylindrical pattern is seen. The hemimicelle morphology is able to prevent the agglomeration of CNTs when the CNT concentration increases to 8.7 mg/mL, while cylindrical morphology is more efficient and stable to provide dispersion of CNTs at higher concentrations of CNTs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanotechnology research and applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
Funding
Australian Research Council · Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Xin X. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1637710.1021/jp8059344 ↗
2. Chen S. J. · IES J. Part A: Civil Struct. Eng. · 2011 · 4 · 254
3. Coleman J. N. · Carbon · 2006 · 44 · 162410.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.038 ↗
4. Habibnejad Korayem A. · Composites, Part A · 2014 · 61 · 12610.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.016 ↗
5. Sandler J. · Polymer · 1999 · 40 · 596710.1016/S0032-3861(99)00166-4 ↗
6. Sumfleth J. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 70 · 17310.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.007 ↗
7. Ma P. C. · Carbon · 2010 · 48 · 182410.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.028 ↗
8. Wang H. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 178910.1021/nl048969z ↗
9. Wenseleers W. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2004 · 14 · 110510.1002/adfm.200400130 ↗
10. Islam M. F. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 26910.1021/nl025924u ↗
11. Shin H.-i. · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2005 · 26 · 145110.1002/marc.200500290 ↗
12. Zhao L. · Colloids Surf., A · 2003 · 224 · 12710.1016/S0927-7757(03)00155-9 ↗
13. Mountrichas G. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 836910.1021/jp067500k ↗
14. Lewis J. A. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2000 · 83 · 234110.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01560.x ↗
15. Zou J. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 205510.1002/adma.200701995 ↗
16. Boon F. · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2010 · 31 · 142710.1002/marc.201000183 ↗
17. Périé T. · Polymer. · 2011 · 52 · 306510.1016/j.polymer.2011.05.019 ↗
18. Mountrichas G. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 836910.1021/jp067500k ↗
19. Iatridi Z. · Soft Matter. · 2013 · 9 · 18510.1039/C2SM27211C ↗
20. Nouranian S. · J. Compos. Mater. · 2011 · 45 · 164710.1177/0021998310385027 ↗
21. Shafieizadegan Esfahani A. R. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 72 · 38210.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.030 ↗
22. Grossiord N. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2007 · 67 · 77810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.035 ↗
23. Grossiord N. · Anal. Chem. · 2005 · 77 · 513510.1021/ac050358j ↗
24. Yu J. · Carbon · 2007 · 45 · 61810.1016/j.carbon.2006.10.010 ↗
25. Yokozeki T. · Composites, Part A · 2007 · 38 · 91710.1016/j.compositesa.2006.07.005 ↗
26. Duan W. H. · Chem. Sci. · 2011 · 2 · 140710.1039/c0sc00616e ↗
27. Monteiro-Riviere N. A. · Nanomedicine (N. Y., NY, U. S.) · 2005 · 1 · 293
28. Xin X. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2007 · 43 · 310610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.04.005 ↗