journal article·2004-07-01

Fabrication of a Gradient Heterogeneous Surface Using Homopolymers and Diblock Copolymers

Irene Y. Tsai, Masahiro Kimura, Thomas P. Russell

Langmuir· Volume 20· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

The strength of the interfacial interactions and the length scale over which these interactions occur are key factors in understanding the thin film behavior of polymer blends and diblock copolymers, adhesion, wettability, and recognition processes of cells and random heteropolymers on surfaces. Here, gradient heterogeneous surface topographies were prepared using thin films of mixtures of homopolymers and diblock copolymers to vary the lateral size scale of heterogeneities from the microscopic to nanoscopic. Dewetting, phase separation, and cell adhesion were used to demonstrate the utility of these surfaces having gradient heterogeneous topographies. By tuning the lateral size scale of the heterogeneities, surface patterns can be engineered to meet a specific function. Gradient surfaces offer a straightforward method to optimize various length scales of heterogeneity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Block Copolymer Self-Assembly · Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polymer Science and Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, and Films & Film Products Research Laboratories, Toray Industries, Inc., 1-1 Sonoyama 1-chome, Otsu, Shiga 520-8558, Japan

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Krausch G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1994 · 20 · 64
2. Seok K. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 112 · 14
3. Böltau M. · Nature · 1998 · 391 · 87710.1038/36075 ↗
4. Kielhorn L. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 111 · 510.1063/1.479497 ↗
5. Petera · J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 107 · 964010.1063/1.475305 ↗
6. Fasolka M. J. · J. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 301810.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3018 ↗
7. Heier J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 111 · 1110110.1063/1.480469 ↗
8. Yang X. M. · Macromolecules · 2000 · 33 · 957510.1021/ma001326v ↗
9. Clark P. · Development · 1990 · 108 · 64410.1242/dev.108.4.635 ↗
10. Flemming R. G. · Biomaterials · 1999 · 20 · 38810.1016/S0142-9612(98)00209-9 ↗
11. Patel N. · FASEB J. · 1998 · 12 · 145410.1096/fasebj.12.14.1447 ↗
12. Whitesides G. M. · Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3, 335−73.
13. Mrksich M. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1996 · 93 · 1077810.1073/pnas.93.20.10775 ↗
14. Tirrell M. · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 500 · 8310.1016/S0039-6028(01)01548-5 ↗
15. Bratko D. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 280 · 5210.1016/S0009-2614(97)01075-0 ↗
16. Golumbfskie J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. · 1999 · 96 · 1171210.1073/pnas.96.21.11707 ↗
17. Zope M. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 114 · 722110.1063/1.1359737 ↗
18. Rockford L. · J. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 260210.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2602 ↗
19. Rockford L. · Macromolecules · 2001 · 34 · 148710.1021/ma001747c ↗
20. Kim S. O. · Nature · 2003 · 424 · 41110.1038/nature01775 ↗
21. Meredith J. C. · J. Macromolecules · 2000 · 33 · 974710.1021/ma001298g ↗
22. Meredith J. C. · J. Macromolecules · 2000 · 33 · 576010.1021/ma0004662 ↗
23. Beers K. L. · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 394010.1021/la026751r ↗
24. Mansky P. · Science · 1997 · 275 · 145810.1126/science.275.5305.1458 ↗
25. Bico J. · Europhys. Lett. · 2001 · 55 · 21410.1209/epl/i2001-00402-x ↗
26. Oner D. · J. Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 778210.1021/la000598o ↗
27. Onda T. · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 212510.1021/la950418o ↗
28. Reiter G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 7510.1103/PhysRevLett.68.75 ↗
29. Jones R. A. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1989 · 62 · 28010.1103/PhysRevLett.62.280 ↗
30. Bruder F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 62410.1103/PhysRevLett.69.624 ↗
31. Swain P. S. · Langmuir · 1998 · 14 · 678010.1021/la980602k ↗