journal article·2014-08-05

Oriented Aggregation of Lepidocrocite and Impact on Surface Charge Development

Philipp A. Kozin, Germàn Salazar-Alvarez, Jean-François Boily

Langmuir· Volume 30· Issue 30
Publisher page

Abstract

The impact of lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH) nanoparticle aggregation on mineral surface charge development was resolved in aqueous solutions of NaCl and NaClO4. Synthetic rod-like particles exhibiting charged edge (100) and neutrally/low-charged (010) faces self-aggregated in salt-free solutions. Aggregation was notably imaged by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and inferred by decreases in N2(g)-B.E.T. specific surface area from 94 m(2)/g to 77 m(2)/g after 12 months, and to 66 m(2)/g after 33 months storage. Potential determining (H(+), OH(-)) ions loadings in the 4-11 pH range were unchanged only if the particles remained aggregated in NaCl but only if they were disaggregated in NaClO4. These differences, alongside molecular simulations and experimental ion loadings resolved in other studies from our group, point to important controls on background electrolyte ion identity on the aggregation and charge development in lepidocrocite. These results may apply further to other mineral surfaces of comparable surface (hydr)oxo populations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Umea University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden

Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse · Vetenskapsr?det

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Stumm W. · 1992
2. Boily, J. F.; Kozin, P. A.Particle morphological and roughness controls on mineral surface charge development.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2014, in press10.1016/j.gca.2014.06.016 ↗
3. Schwertmann U. · 2003
4. Boily J. F. · Colloids Surf., A · 2001 · 179 · 1110.1016/S0927-7757(00)00712-3 ↗
5. Rustad J. R. · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 2005 · 69 · 140510.1016/j.gca.2004.08.030 ↗
6. Venema P. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1998 · 198 · 28210.1006/jcis.1997.5245 ↗
7. Gaboriaud F. · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 2003 · 67 · 96710.1016/S0016-7037(02)00988-2 ↗
8. Villalobos M. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2008 · 326 · 30710.1016/j.jcis.2008.06.026 ↗
9. Davis J. A. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1978 · 67 · 9010.1016/0021-9797(78)90217-5 ↗
10. Zhang Y. · Colloids Surf. · 1992 · 63 · 25910.1016/0166-6622(92)80247-Y ↗
11. Lewis D. G. · Clay Miner. · 1986 · 21 · 9310.1180/claymin.1986.021.1.08 ↗
12. Sugimoto T. · Colloids Surf., A · 1998 · 134 · 26510.1016/S0927-7757(97)00103-9 ↗
13. Li D. S. · Science · 2012 · 336 · 101410.1126/science.1219643 ↗
14. Yuwono V. M. · Faraday Discuss. · 2012 · 159 · 23510.1039/c2fd20115a ↗
15. Niederberger M. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 8 · 327110.1039/B604589H ↗
16. Kumar S. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 339810.1021/jp0677445 ↗
17. Shen P. · Nano Lett. · 2001 · 1 · 70710.1021/nl010058r ↗
18. Zhong L. S. · Adv. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 242610.1002/adma.200600504 ↗
19. Jia C. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2006 · 294 · 35310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.06.027 ↗
20. Wang J. · Vacuum · 2007 · 82 · 510.1016/j.vacuum.2006.05.005 ↗
21. Lai H.-Y. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2009 · 311 · 469810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.08.023 ↗
22. Su H. · J. Membr. Sci. · 2006 · 283 · 710.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.010 ↗
23. Yuwono V. M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 216310.1021/ja909769a ↗
24. Song X. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 257910.1039/c2cp22715k ↗
25. Boily J. F. · Langmuir · 2014 · 30 · 200910.1021/la403938w ↗
26. Song X. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 560 · 110.1016/j.cplett.2012.12.048 ↗
27. Kozin P. A. · Langmuir · 2013 · 29 · 1212910.1021/la401318t ↗