Spreading of a Droplet over a Nonisothermal Substrate: Multiple Scaling Regimes
Source abstract
Abstract
We envisage the spreading behavior of a two-dimensional droplet under a thin-film-based paradigm, under a perfect wetting condition, while the droplet is placed over a nonisothermal substrate. Starting from the onset of thin-film behavior (or equivalently beyond the inertia-dominated initial stage), we identify the existence of mutually contrasting multiple scaling regimes defining the spreading behavior at different time scales. This is attributable to the time-stage-wise upsurge of capillarity or thermocapillarity over the other. In particular, the spreading behavior is characterized by the foot-width (w) evolution with time (t) in a power-law fashion w ∼ t(α), with α being the spreading exponent, defining the rate of spreading. Following pertinent thin-film and subsequent similarity analysis, we identify different asymptotes of α over disparate temporal scales, leading to the characterization of different scaling regimes over the entire spreading event starting from the inception of thin-film behavior. Reported literature data are found to correspond well to the present interpretations and estimations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies · Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Choi K. · Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. · 2012 · 5 · 41310.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143028 ↗
2. Darhuber A. A. · Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 2005 · 37 · 42510.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122052 ↗
3. Mukhopadhyay S. · Phys. Rev. E · 2011 · 83 · 04630210.1103/PhysRevE.83.046302 ↗
4. Biance A.-L. · Phys. Rev. E · 2004 · 69 · 01630110.1103/PhysRevE.69.016301 ↗
5. Winkels K. G. · Phys. Rev. E · 2012 · 85 · 05530110.1103/PhysRevE.85.055301 ↗
6. Brzoska J. B. · Langmuir · 1993 · 9 · 222010.1021/la00032a052 ↗
7. Gomba J. M. · J. Fluid Mech. · 2010 · 647 · 12510.1017/S0022112010000078 ↗
8. Eddi A. · Phys. Fluids · 2013 · 25 · 01310210.1063/1.4788693 ↗
9. Bird J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 23450110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.234501 ↗
10. Benintendi S. W. · Phys. Fluids · 1999 · 11 · 98210.1063/1.869970 ↗
11. Karapetsas G. · Langmuir · 2014 · 30 · 431010.1021/la5002682 ↗
12. Leal L. G. · 200710.1017/CBO9780511800245 ↗
13. Oron A. · J. Fluid Mech. · 2006 · 273 · 36110.1017/S0022112094001977 ↗
14. Vochten R. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1973 · 42 · 32010.1016/0021-9797(73)90295-6 ↗
15. Limbourg-Fontaine M. C. · Acta Astronaut. · 1986 · 13 · 19710.1016/0094-5765(86)90064-0 ↗
16. Davidovitch B. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 24450510.1103/PhysRevLett.95.244505 ↗
17. Willis A. M. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 464128
18. Grün G. · J. Stat. Phys. · 2006 · 122 · 126110.1007/s10955-006-9028-8 ↗
19. Moseler M. · Science · 2000 · 289 · 116510.1126/science.289.5482.1165 ↗
20. Hennequin Y. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 24450210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.244502 ↗
21. Gopan N. · Phys. Rev. E · 2014 · 90 · 03300110.1103/PhysRevE.90.033001 ↗
22. Willis A. M. · Phys. Fluids · 2010 · 22 · 02200210.1063/1.3326077 ↗