journal article·2009-04-21

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Water Confined between Matched Pairs of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Self-Assembled Monolayers

Christian D. Lorenz, J. Matthew D. Lane, Michael Chandross, Mark J. Stevens, Gary S. Grest

Langmuir· Volume 25· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

We have conducted a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation study of water confined between methyl-terminated and carboxyl-terminated alkylsilane self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on amorphous silica substrates. In doing so, we have investigated the dynamic and structural behavior of the water molecules when compressed to loads ranging from 20 to 950 MPa for two different amounts of water (27 and 58 water molecules/nm2). Within the studied range of loads, we observe that no water molecules penetrate the hydrophobic region of the carboxyl-terminated SAMs. However, we observe that at loads larger than 150 MPa water molecules penetrate the methyl-terminated SAMs and form hydrogen-bonded chains that connect to the bulk water. The diffusion coefficient of the water molecules decreases as the water film becomes thinner and pressure increases. When compared to bulk diffusion coefficients of water molecules at the various loads, we found that the diffusion coefficients for the systems with 27 water molecules/nm2 are reduced by a factor of 20 at low loads and by a factor of 40 at high loads, while the diffusion coefficients for the systems with 58 water molecules/nm2 are reduced by a factor of 25 at all loads.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK WC2R 2LS

Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Chau K. H.-L. · Sens. Actuators A · 1996 · 54 · 47210.1016/S0924-4247(97)80006-4 ↗
2. Verdonckt-Vandeboeck S. · Proc. SPIE · 1997 · 3224 · 18010.1117/12.284514 ↗
3. Henck S. A. · Tribol. Lett. · 1997 · 3 · 23910.1023/A:1019129021492 ↗
4. Maboudian R. · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2004 · 55 · 3510.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094445 ↗
5. Bhushan B. · Microelectron. Eng. · 2007 · 84 · 38710.1016/j.mee.2006.10.059 ↗
6. Nosonovsky M. · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2007 · 58 · 16210.1016/j.mser.2007.09.001 ↗
7. Kim S. H. · Nanotoday · 2007 · 2 · 2210.1016/S1748-0132(07)70140-8 ↗
8. Szlufarska I. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 12300110.1088/0022-3727/41/12/123001 ↗
9. Carpick R. W. · Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 97 · 116310.1021/cr960068q ↗
10. Maboudian R. · Sens. Actuators A · 2000 · 82 · 21910.1016/S0924-4247(99)00337-4 ↗
11. Tambe N. S. · Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 154910.1088/0957-4484/16/9/024 ↗
12. Baker M. A. · Surf. Interface Anal. · 2006 · 38 · 86310.1002/sia.2210 ↗
13. Srinivasan U. · J. Microelectromech. Syst. · 1998 · 7 · 25210.1109/84.679393 ↗
14. Peschel G. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1970 · 34 · 50510.1016/0021-9797(70)90212-2 ↗
15. Kim H. I. · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 927110.1021/la034585x ↗
16. Major R. C. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 17780310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.177803 ↗
17. Horn R. G. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1989 · 162 · 40410.1016/0009-2614(89)87066-6 ↗
18. Klein J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1998 · 108 · 699610.1063/1.476114 ↗
19. Raviv U. · Nature (London) · 2001 · 413 · 5110.1038/35092523 ↗
20. Klein J. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2004 · 16 · S5437
21. Jensen M. Ø. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 120 · 972910.1063/1.1697379 ↗
22. Li T.-D. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 11541510.1103/PhysRevB.75.115415 ↗
23. Janeček J. · Langmuir · 2007 · 23 · 841710.1021/la700561q ↗
24. Giovambattista N. · Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 73 · 04160410.1103/PhysRevE.73.041604 ↗
25. Lane J. M. D. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 520910.1021/la704005v ↗
26. Stevens M. J. · Biointerfaces · 2008 · 3 · FC13
27. Lorenz C. D. · Langmuir · 2005 · 21 · 1174410.1021/la051741m ↗
28. Lane J. M. D. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 573410.1021/la703492j ↗
29. Iler R. K. · 1979
30. Chandross M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 16610310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.166103 ↗
31. Lorenz C. D. · Phys. Rev. E · 2007 · 75 · 06120210.1103/PhysRevE.75.061202 ↗
32. Thompson P. A. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 344810.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3448 ↗
33. Plimpton S. · J. Comput. Phys. · 117 · 1 · 1995
34. Jorgensen W. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 1122510.1021/ja9621760 ↗
35. Jorgensen, W. J.,private communication, 2003.
36. Jorgensen W. L. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1983 · 79 · 92610.1063/1.445869 ↗
37. Ryckaert J. P. · J. Comput. Phys. · 1977 · 23 · 32710.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 ↗
38. Crozier P. S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 113 · 751310.1063/1.1362290 ↗
39. Luzar A. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 92810.1103/PhysRevLett.76.928 ↗
40. Van Hove L. · Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 95 · 24910.1103/PhysRev.95.249 ↗
41. Lopes P. E. M. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 278210.1021/jp055341j ↗
42. de Boer M. P. · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 453110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00239-1 ↗