journal article·2024-11-05

Enhancing mRNA Interactions by Engineering the Arc Protein with Nucleocapsid Domain

Vaibhav Upadhayay, Wenchao Gu, Qiuming Yu

Langmuir· Volume 40· Issue 44
Publisher page

Abstract

Activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc) forms virus-like capsids for mRNA transport between neurons. Unlike HIV-1 Group-specific Antigen (Gag), which uses its Nucleocapsid (NC) domain to bind HIV-1 genomic mRNA, mammalian Arc lacks the NC domain, and their direct mRNA binding interactions remain underexplored. This study examined rat Arc's binding to rat Arc 5' UTR (A5U), HIV-1 5' UTR (H5U), and GFP mRNAs, revealing weak binding with no significant preference. Adding the HIV-1 NC domain to rArc's C-terminus significantly improved binding to H5U, while also showing substantial binding to A5U at about 60% of its H5U level and exhibiting twice the affinity for A5U over GFP mRNA. Importantly, rArc-NC binds 3.4 times more A5U and H5U than GST-NC, indicating that rArc NTD-CA aids mRNA binding by HIV-1 NC. These findings suggest a conserved Gag protein-mRNA interaction mechanism, highlighting the potential for developing mRNA delivery systems that combine endogenous Gag NTD-CA with retroviral NC and UTRs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: RNA Research and Splicing · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms · RNA modifications and cancer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Cornell University

Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.09044810.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090448 ↗
2. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.0026210.3389/fmicb.2012.00262 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0959-437X(99)00031-310.1016/S0959-437X(99)00031-3 ↗
4. 10.3390/ijms2310584710.3390/ijms23105847 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tig.2006.09.00610.1016/j.tig.2006.09.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.03010.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.030 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.03310.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.033 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.03610.1016/j.cell.2011.09.036 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.02610.1016/j.cell.2010.01.026 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.02310.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.023 ↗
11. 10.1038/nature1292910.1038/nature12929 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.02410.1016/j.cell.2017.12.024 ↗
13. 10.1371/journal.ppat.101193710.1371/journal.ppat.1011937 ↗
14. 10.1089/aid.2011.023010.1089/aid.2011.0230 ↗
15. 10.1128/JVI.73.10.8527-8540.199910.1128/JVI.73.10.8527-8540.1999 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.279.5349.38410.1126/science.279.5349.384 ↗
17. 10.7554/eLife.1466310.7554/eLife.14663 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.str.2019.04.00110.1016/j.str.2019.04.001 ↗
19. 10.1111/febs.1561810.1111/febs.15618 ↗
20. 10.3390/ijms2403270010.3390/ijms24032700 ↗
21. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-3-reviews000410.1186/gb-2002-3-3-reviews0004 ↗
22. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.397910.1006/jmbi.2000.3979 ↗
23. 10.1261/rna.038869.11310.1261/rna.038869.113 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biochi.2020.09.02410.1016/j.biochi.2020.09.024 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.02210.1016/j.cell.2017.12.022 ↗
26. 10.1126/science.abg615510.1126/science.abg6155 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41551-023-01150-x10.1038/s41551-023-01150-x ↗
28. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-210.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-110.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 ↗
30. 10.1073/pnas.24132029810.1073/pnas.241320298 ↗
31. 10.3390/v1403062210.3390/v14030622 ↗
32. 10.2217/fvl.09.410.2217/fvl.09.4 ↗
33. 10.3390/v1309181910.3390/v13091819 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.chom.2021.07.00610.1016/j.chom.2021.07.006 ↗
35. 10.1042/BJ2014144610.1042/BJ20141446 ↗
36. 10.1093/nar/gkad12410.1093/nar/gkad124 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c0001210.1021/acs.biochem.1c00012 ↗
38. 10.1006/jmbi.2002.542210.1006/jmbi.2002.5422 ↗
39. 10.1093/nar/gkn18810.1093/nar/gkn188 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00216-019-01996-810.1007/s00216-019-01996-8 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.09.03510.1016/j.bios.2008.09.035 ↗