journal article·2023-08Open access

Characterizing the Impact of Oligomerization on Redox Flow Cell Performance

Trent A. Weiss, Gang Fan, Bertrand J. Neyhouse, Evan B. Moore, Ariel Furst, Fikile R. Brushett

Batteries & Supercaps· Volume 6· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are hindered by complex failure modes, particularly crossover through the membrane, resulting in capacity fade and reduced cycling efficiencies. Redox‐active oligomers (RAOs) have recently been proposed for mitigating this phenomenon while maintaining sufficient transport properties; however, to date, few studies have quantified how the chemical and electrochemical properties of RAOs influence their performance in redox flow cells. Here, we demonstrate that oligomeric derivatives of 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidine 1‐oxyl (TEMPO) exhibit lower diffusivities than the monomeric species but retain facile charge transfer characteristics. The size‐dependent variations in mass transport rates directly translate to differences in flow cell polarization and symmetric cycling performance. Post‐mortem analyses reveal that oligomerization does not meaningfully alter decay processes as evinced by similar capacity fade across all species. Broadly, these findings corroborate and extend upon previously developed relationships between molecular size, electrochemical properties, and flow cell performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA

Joint Center for Energy Storage Research Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy · National Science Foundation

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1147510.1038/nature11475 ↗
2. 10.1109/JPROC.2014.232031710.1109/JPROC.2014.2320317 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22795810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227958 ↗
4. 10.1039/C7CS00569E10.1039/C7CS00569E ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22998310.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229983 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0SE00800A10.1039/D0SE00800A ↗
7. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.02410.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.024 ↗
8. 10.1149/2.0051601jes10.1149/2.0051601jes ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0155110.1021/acsenergylett.2c01551 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.1511707jes10.1149/2.1511707jes ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20161058210.1002/anie.201610582 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0034110.1021/acs.accounts.6b00341 ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.6b0636510.1021/jacs.6b06365 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0131810.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01318 ↗
15. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b0054410.1021/acscentsci.7b00544 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.7b0835310.1021/jacs.7b08353 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0413110.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04131 ↗
18. 10.1021/acscentsci.8b0009910.1021/acscentsci.8b00099 ↗
19. 10.1002/celc.20180073610.1002/celc.201800736 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja508482e10.1021/ja508482e ↗
21. 10.1149/2.0021604jes10.1149/2.0021604jes ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.052 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja508482e10.1021/ja508482e ↗
24. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.02510.1016/j.joule.2019.08.025 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41586-021-03377-710.1038/s41586-021-03377-7 ↗
26. 10.1002/chem.20200074910.1002/chem.202000749 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.12510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.125 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0076310.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00763 ↗
29. 10.1039/D0MA00881H10.1039/D0MA00881H ↗
30. 10.1039/D1TA04297A10.1039/D1TA04297A ↗
31. 10.1021/cr940053x10.1021/cr940053x ↗
32. 10.1021/ac60210a00710.1021/ac60210a007 ↗
33. Bard A. J. · 2000 · 156
34. 10.1021/ja00481a04010.1021/ja00481a040 ↗
35. 10.1149/2.012112esl10.1149/2.012112esl ↗
36. 10.1246/bcsj.77.220310.1246/bcsj.77.2203 ↗
37. 10.1063/5.006189110.1063/5.0061891 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b0668110.1021/acs.jpcb.9b06681 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.369473610.1063/1.3694736 ↗
40. 10.1529/biophysj.108.13302510.1529/biophysj.108.133025 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c0219110.1021/acs.jpcb.1c02191 ↗
42. Mark J. E. · 2007 · 4310.1007/978-0-387-69002-5 ↗
43. 10.1002/app.5273210.1002/app.52732 ↗
44. 10.1039/C9CP06869D10.1039/C9CP06869D ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b0014310.1021/acs.jctc.9b00143 ↗
46. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac86aa10.1149/1945-7111/ac86aa ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.04610.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.046 ↗
48. 10.1149/2.0681809jes10.1149/2.0681809jes ↗
49. 10.1016/0013-4686(93)85083-B10.1016/0013-4686(93)85083-B ↗
50. 10.1007/978-1-84882-846-9_410.1007/978-1-84882-846-9_4 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0059910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00599 ↗
52. 10.1149/2.0891807jes10.1149/2.0891807jes ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.08.02710.1016/j.jiec.2019.08.027 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0295910.1021/acsaem.2c02959 ↗
55. 10.1021/ja00437a00610.1021/ja00437a006 ↗
56. A. Reuther J. Kepner C. Byun S. Samsi W. Arcand D. Bestor B. Bergeron V. Gadepally M. Houle M. Hubbell M. Jones A. Klein L. Milechin J. Mullen A. Prout A. Rosa C. Yee P. Michaleas in 2018 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)2018 pp. 1–6.10.1109/HPEC.2018.8547629 ↗
57. 10.1039/C6EE02027E10.1039/C6EE02027E ↗