journal article·2023-02-13

Improving Cycling Performance of Vanadium-Based Electrode Deposited with Poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) for Lithium-Ion Battery Application

Muhammad Amirul Aizat Mohd Abdah, Tian Khoon Lee, Azizan Ahmad, Yusran Sulaiman, Nurul Akmaliah Dzulkarnain, Marliyana Mokhtar, Mohammad Khalid, Mohd Sukor Su’ait

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 6· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Conducting polymers have attracted a considerable amount of interest as a high-performance electrode candidate for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), which can substantially improve the electrical conductivity of the electrode by promoting electrical conduction pathways along the active materials. In this work, we have demonstrated the significant enhancement of carbon nanofibers/vanadium pentoxide using poly(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as dopant, denoted as (CNFs/V 2 O 5 /PEDOT) in electrochemical performance. CNFs/V 2 O 5 /PEDOT is successfully prepared via electrospinning, hydrothermal and subsequent electropolymerization processes. On the basis of experimental data, galvanostatic charge–discharge in half-cell of CNFs/V 2 O 5 /PEDOT revealed remarkably enhanced Li storage performance by exhibiting 520 mAh/g of initial discharge capacity at 2 mA/g, which is nearly two times higher than the CNFs/V 2 O 5 electrode (270.4 mAh/g). However, the electrochemical properties of CNFs/V 2 O 5 /PEDOT electrode is dramatically degraded in the following cycles. To further understand the rapid degradation of CNFs/V 2 O 5, the DEIS ( in situ impedance analysis) approach is used as a faithful representation as a real battery system. The results indicated that degradation is originating from electrode pulverization upon volume expansion/shrinkage and unstable SEI formation during cycling. The DEIS studies manifested that CNFs/V 2 O 5 /PEDOT electrode could not withstand high potential when charge (>2.5 V). Conventionally, improvements in cycling performance were observed when the corrected cutoff voltages (1.0 to 2.5 V) were applied despite the high charging rate at a current density of 10 mA/g. It shows that CNFs/V 2 O 5 /PEDOT electrode can retain about 83% of the initial capacity as compared with CNFs/V 2 O 5 (∼67% capacity retention) with enhanced charge transfer resistance ( R ct ) (25 Ω) after cycling, confirming that PEDOT could serve as a protective layer to prevent the surface side reactions of the electrodes with the electrolyte. This work suggests that CNFs/V 2 O 5 /PEDOT electrode could potentially serve as a promising material candidate for ultrafast charging of LIBs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advancements in Battery Materials · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Solar Energy Research Institute, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

Graphene & Advanced 2D Materials Research Group (GAMRG), School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, 47500Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Sunway Materials Smart Science & Engineering (SMS2E) Research Cluster, Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, 47500Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

School of Chemical Sciences AND Polymer Research Center (PORCE), Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

Research Center for Quantum Engineering Design, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Airlangga, 60115Surabaya, Malaysia

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

Functional Devices Laboratory, Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

International Battery Center Sdn. Bhd, Incubator 3, Technology Park Malaysia, 57000Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Funding

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enchem.2022.10007210.1016/j.enchem.2022.100072 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.03210.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.032 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ces.2020.11551710.1016/j.ces.2020.115517 ↗
4. 10.1039/C1CS15060J10.1039/C1CS15060J ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12584210.1016/j.cej.2020.125842 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mseb.2014.01.01510.1016/j.mseb.2014.01.015 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.07810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.078 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.03910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.039 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0152410.1021/acsaem.2c01524 ↗
10. 10.1080/1539445X.2017.138715110.1080/1539445X.2017.1387151 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.11500510.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12570010.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.125700 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40843-016-5039-610.1007/s40843-016-5039-6 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10819910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108199 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.07.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.07.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2020.10643010.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2020.106430 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.07110.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.071 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.07310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.073 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.00710.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.007 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.18610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.186 ↗
21. 10.1039/C6TA01417H10.1039/C6TA01417H ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.09.01510.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.09.015 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12494110.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124941 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.09.00110.1016/j.sna.2016.09.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.16010.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.160 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.11.02110.1016/j.jiec.2018.11.021 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13614010.1016/j.electacta.2020.136140 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13666910.1016/j.electacta.2020.136669 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.18910.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.189 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.03810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.038 ↗
31. 10.1002/ente.20180100110.1002/ente.201801001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15371910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153719 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mee.2014.04.04410.1016/j.mee.2014.04.044 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.13210.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.132 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.12.01910.1016/j.ssi.2010.12.019 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15464810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154648 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.25210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.252 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.11.02010.1016/j.ssi.2011.11.020 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.21210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.212 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.15610.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.156 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13687010.1016/j.electacta.2020.136870 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13735110.1016/j.electacta.2020.137351 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.048 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14729010.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147290 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13523210.1016/j.electacta.2019.135232 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.06910.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.069 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.01310.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.013 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.6b0743110.1021/acsami.6b07431 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15019810.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150198 ↗
50. 10.1006/jssc.1999.828310.1006/jssc.1999.8283 ↗
51. 10.3390/nano1214240010.3390/nano12142400 ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20180482210.1002/adma.201804822 ↗
53. Materials Data on PF5 by Materials Project. https://www.osti.gov/dataexplorer/biblio/dataset/1308963.
54. Materials Data on AgPF6 by Materials Project. https://www.osti.gov/dataexplorer/biblio/dataset/1206820
55. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0167610.1021/acsaem.8b01676 ↗