journal article·2022-11-28

Low-Temperature Fabrication of TiC Nanotube Arrays by Molten Salt Electrolysis for Supercapacitor Application

Tongxiang Ma, Rui Tan, Junyu Chen, Yuzheng Pan, Meilong Hu, Guang Han, Liwen Hu, Zhiming Yan

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 5· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

A strategy for the synthesis of nanostructured metal carbides that can convert oxides into carbides while maintaining their original nanomorphology is proposed in this study. TiC nanotube arrays (TiC NTAs) were successfully prepared by electrodeoxidation and carbonization in a low-temperature molten salt (600 °C) using TiO2 nanotube arrays (TiO2 NTAs) as precursors. The effects of different factors on the heritability of nanostructures are discussed in detail. TiC NTAs have a highly ordered and directional array structure, a large specific surface area, excellent electrical conductivity, and outstanding chemical stability. Quasi-solid-state supercapacitors based on TiC NTA electrodes exhibit excellent electrochemical energy storage properties such as low charge transfer resistance, high energy density (4.2 μW h cm–2), and excellent cycle stability (90% retention after 10,000 cycles). This study demonstrates a high-performance supercapacitor nanoarray material and provides a general method to synthesize nanostructured metal carbides.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing400044, China

Warwick Manufacturing Group (WMG), University of Warwick, CoventryCV47AL, U.K.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.24910.1016/j.rser.2015.12.249 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scib.2019.08.00810.1016/j.scib.2019.08.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.09.04510.1016/j.cclet.2019.09.045 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.02410.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.024 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.03210.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.032 ↗
6. 10.1039/c1ee01338f10.1039/c1ee01338f ↗
7. 10.1039/c6ta08179g10.1039/c6ta08179g ↗
8. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.01510.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.015 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20160046810.1002/aenm.201600468 ↗
10. 10.1021/nn503814y10.1021/nn503814y ↗
11. 10.1021/nl402741j10.1021/nl402741j ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.03610.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.036 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.6b0355910.1021/acsami.6b03559 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10454910.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104549 ↗
15. 10.3390/nano908115210.3390/nano9081152 ↗
16. 10.1039/c5ee00339c10.1039/c5ee00339c ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20160274210.1002/smll.201602742 ↗
18. 10.1039/c6ta11198j10.1039/c6ta11198j ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.04.04710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.04.047 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp075690910.1021/jp0756909 ↗
21. 10.1021/cg200597910.1021/cg2005979 ↗
22. 10.1007/s12613-020-2202-110.1007/s12613-020-2202-1 ↗
23. Chen G. Z. · 2019 · 227
24. 10.1039/c5fd00231a10.1039/c5fd00231a ↗
25. 10.1149/2.1951712jes10.1149/2.1951712jes ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13485210.1016/j.electacta.2019.134852 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.01610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.016 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.10710.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.107 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mser.2013.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2013.10.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.21610.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.216 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.03810.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.038 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.09110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.091 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep0938710.1038/srep09387 ↗
34. 10.1002/smll.20170063910.1002/smll.201700639 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12752410.1016/j.cej.2020.127524 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.08610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.086 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20190728410.1002/adfm.201907284 ↗
38. 10.1021/nl302761z10.1021/nl302761z ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22988210.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229882 ↗