journal article·2021-09-27

Laser-Generated InOx/ZrO2 Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation: Role of In Situ Fragmentation and Ripening Control

Kinran Lau, Patrick Schühle, Shun-Xing Liang, Florian de Kock, Jakob Albert, Sven Reichenberger

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

It is desirable to reduce the reliance on fossil fuels and to develop alternative methods to yield valuable chemicals. CO2 hydrogenation to methanol is a promising approach, where In2O3/ZrO2 catalysts have attracted increasing attention due to their high selectivity and stability. However, the activity of indium-based catalysts is very susceptible to the preparation method, which is typically wet impregnation. Here, we explore a laser-based synthesis route to prepare InOx/ZrO2 catalysts of varying indium size and load. The respective particle sizes were either adjusted by in situ fragmentation with a more (ns-VIS-laser) or less (ns-IR-laser) efficient laser wavelength or by using micromolar concentrations of phosphate as an electrostatic stabilizer. The InOx colloids were subsequently deposited onto ZrO2 Our results demonstrate that the pulsed laser ablation with ns-IR-laser pulses yielded larger ∼45 nm crystalline cuboid InOx supported on zirconia. The frequency-doubled ns-VIS-pulses on the other hand caused an augmented in situ fragmentation during ablation, which led to catalysts with spherical ∼14 nm InOx particles with a significantly higher degree of amorphousness. Further size quenching and increased amorphous content of the InOx nanoparticles were observed when micromolar concentrations of phosphates were additionally present during ablation. After supporting the InOx nanoparticles onto ZrO2, the laser-generated catalysts were found to perform equally well as their wet-chemically prepared counterparts for methanol synthesis in a slurry phase, although crystalline In species performed slightly better in the catalytic reaction. In conclusion, in situ fragmentation does not only provide opportunities for independent studies of size and composition but also ripening control and structural modifications such as amorphization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Technical Chemistry I and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätstr. 7, Essen 45141, Germany

Friedrich−Alexander University Erlangen−Nürnberg, Institute of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Egerlandstraße 3, Erlangen 91058, Germany

University of Hamburg, Institute of Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Bundesstraße 45, Hamburg 20146, Germany

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Garside, M. Global Production Capacity of Methanol 2018-2030. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1065891/global-methanol-production-capacity (accessed March, 14, 2021).
2. 10.1002/cben.20197001210.1002/cben.201970012 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20200739710.1002/anie.202007397 ↗
4. Olah G. A. · 201810.1002/9783527805662 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.pecs.2016.06.00110.1016/j.pecs.2016.06.001 ↗
6. 10.1002/cite.20200010910.1002/cite.202000109 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20160094310.1002/anie.201600943 ↗
8. 10.1039/d0cy00946f10.1039/d0cy00946f ↗
9. Twigg M. V. · Top. Catal. · 2003 · 22 · 19110.1023/A:1023567718303 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0154610.1021/acs.iecr.9b01546 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-019-11349-910.1038/s41467-019-11349-9 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.08310.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.083 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.06.01810.1016/j.jcat.2020.06.018 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0212010.1021/acscatal.0c02120 ↗
15. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz206010.1126/sciadv.aaz2060 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apcata.2019.11714410.1016/j.apcata.2019.117144 ↗
17. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0330510.1021/acscatal.9b03305 ↗
18. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0186910.1021/acscatal.9b01869 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.03.01410.1016/j.jcat.2018.03.014 ↗
20. 10.1021/cs400132a10.1021/cs400132a ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.9b0487310.1021/jacs.9b04873 ↗
22. 10.1002/cctc.20190066610.1002/cctc.201900666 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.07.03310.1016/j.jcat.2015.07.033 ↗
24. 10.1021/la502588g10.1021/la502588g ↗
25. 10.1039/c5cp04296h10.1039/c5cp04296h ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.14510.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.145 ↗
27. 10.3390/nano1008158210.3390/nano10081582 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0080910.1021/acs.cgd.8b00809 ↗
29. 10.1039/c7nr08614h10.1039/c7nr08614h ↗
30. 10.1002/chem.20200068610.1002/chem.202000686 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0437410.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04374 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-017-13333-z10.1038/s41598-017-13333-z ↗
33. Lau M. · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 5366
34. 10.1002/cssc.20190318610.1002/cssc.201903186 ↗
35. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0241610.1021/acscatal.6b02416 ↗
36. 10.1039/c1jm12502h10.1039/c1jm12502h ↗
37. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0075610.1021/acsaem.9b00756 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.10810.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.108 ↗
39. 10.1364/ol.41.00148610.1364/ol.41.001486 ↗
40. 10.1006/jcis.2001.748410.1006/jcis.2001.7484 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mssp.2012.12.00910.1016/j.mssp.2012.12.009 ↗
42. 10.1039/c3ta15407f10.1039/c3ta15407f ↗
43. 10.1002/adsc.20200100310.1002/adsc.202001003 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cis.2009.08.00310.1016/j.cis.2009.08.003 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.12401610.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124016 ↗
46. 10.1134/s0030400x1912032410.1134/s0030400x19120324 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.05.00310.1016/j.apsusc.2010.05.003 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0046810.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00468 ↗
49. 10.1021/ic061999f10.1021/ic061999f ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0068510.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00685 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.13810.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.138 ↗
52. 10.1139/v74-28110.1139/v74-281 ↗
53. 10.1002/sia.74015110210.1002/sia.740151102 ↗
54. 10.1149/2.0681606jes10.1149/2.0681606jes ↗
55. 10.1016/s0013-4686(99)00319-910.1016/s0013-4686(99)00319-9 ↗