journal article·2021-04-26Open access

Epitaxial Stabilization and Oxygen Evolution Reaction Activity of Metastable Columbite Iridium Oxide

Kyuho Lee, Raul A. Flores, Yunzhi Liu, Bai Yang Wang, Yasuyuki Hikita, Robert Sinclair, Michal Bajdich, Harold Y. Hwang

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 4

Abstract

Non-rutile polymorphs of binary iridium oxide such as columbite IrO2 (α-IrO2) are promising candidates for highly active acid-stable oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts, yet their synthesis has been challenging due to the dominant thermodynamic stability of rutile IrO2 (R-IrO2). Here, we report the growth of α-IrO2 via epitaxial thin films using pulsed laser deposition. We observe that, in competition with R-IrO2 (100), the films can be optimized to be predominantly (100)-oriented α-IrO2. Surprisingly, the activity of α-IrO2 shows a large discrepancy of ∼0.2 V in the overpotential compared to its predicted activity, which is resolved via theoretical calculations to be a crystal orientation effect. This demonstrates that the electrocatalytic activity can be significantly varied upon crystal orientation, a parameter that is difficult to control in conventional polycrystalline systems but accessible in epitaxial thin films. In total, this study demonstrates epitaxial thin film growth as a powerful technique, which can overcome large energetic instabilities on the order of ∼300 meV to stabilize metastable material structures inaccessible by bulk synthesis. This provides unique opportunities to effectively identify the atomic structure of active catalysts by combining investigations of metastable materials with theoretical predictions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States

Stanford Institute for Materials & Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States

Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States

SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States

Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · Stanford University · Laboratory Directed Research and Development

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.110319710.1126/science.1103197 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2007.01.02310.1016/j.rser.2007.01.023 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr100246c10.1021/cr100246c ↗
4. 10.1039/C4CY00669K10.1039/C4CY00669K ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat477810.1038/nmat4778 ↗
6. 10.1039/C6CS00328A10.1039/C6CS00328A ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aad499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.15110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja407115p10.1021/ja407115p ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aaf505010.1126/science.aaf5050 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0076610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00766 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0001510.1021/acsomega.8b00015 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-019-11789-310.1038/s41467-019-11789-3 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp953358410.1021/jp9533584 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.271.5249.62910.1126/science.271.5249.629 ↗
16. 10.1021/ja904606910.1021/ja9046069 ↗
17. 10.1039/b821799h10.1039/b821799h ↗
18. 10.1021/am405914910.1021/am4059149 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5TA04678E10.1039/C5TA04678E ↗
20. 10.1016/j.physb.2005.03.01410.1016/j.physb.2005.03.014 ↗
21. Ono S. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2008 · 20 · 045202
22. 10.1002/pssb.20084423810.1002/pssb.200844238 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.105110.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1051 ↗
24. 10.1021/cm021111v10.1021/cm021111v ↗
25. 10.1063/1.212090310.1063/1.2120903 ↗
26. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/29/29540210.1088/0953-8984/21/29/295402 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.07.01910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.07.019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.03.05810.1016/j.matlet.2010.03.058 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.03.04710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.03.047 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.504532710.1063/1.5045327 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0017310.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00173 ↗
32. 10.1016/0022-0728(92)80162-W10.1016/0022-0728(92)80162-W ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
34. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41597-019-0081-y10.1038/s41597-019-0081-y ↗
39. Computational Data, 2020. https://www.catalysis-hub.org/publications/LeeEpitaxial2020.
40. 10.1002/cctc.20100039710.1002/cctc.201000397 ↗
41. 10.1021/ja511559d10.1021/ja511559d ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.7b0262210.1021/jacs.7b02622 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.9b1369710.1021/acsami.9b13697 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
45. 10.1088/0953-8984/8/36/00510.1088/0953-8984/8/36/005 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.07543710.1103/PhysRevB.77.075437 ↗
47. 10.1107/S010876819700146810.1107/S0108768197001468 ↗
48. 10.1039/C5CP04840K10.1039/C5CP04840K ↗
49. 10.1016/0022-5088(71)90141-X10.1016/0022-5088(71)90141-X ↗
50. 10.1063/1.494351910.1063/1.4943519 ↗
51. Cullity B. D. · 2014
52. 10.1021/jz500610u10.1021/jz500610u ↗
53. 10.1021/jacs.6b1193210.1021/jacs.6b11932 ↗
54. 10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01055-010.1016/S0022-0728(02)01055-0 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10800-009-9809-210.1007/s10800-009-9809-2 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.11.01810.1016/j.elecom.2009.11.018 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0013510.1021/acsenergylett.7b00135 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.susc.2018.11.01910.1016/j.susc.2018.11.019 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0199010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01990 ↗
60. 10.1039/C9CP06726D10.1039/C9CP06726D ↗
61. 10.1038/nmat474910.1038/nmat4749 ↗