journal article·2025-01Open access

Nanostructured Ionic Liquid Containing Block Copolymer Electrolytes for Solid‐State Supercapacitors

Anto Puthussery Varghese, Daniela de Morais Zanata, Sima Lashkari, Miryam Criado‐González, Maria Forsyth, Patrick C. Howlett, Andrew N. Rider, Nicolas Goujon, Irune Villaluenga

Batteries & Supercaps· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract We report on the physiochemical behaviour of membranes based on three different polystyrene‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐polystyrene (PS‐b‐PEO‐b‐PS) block copolymers and an ionic liquid (1‐ethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (EMIMTFSI)) and their use as solid‐state electrolytes in supercapacitors. The nanostructured block copolymers form free standing membranes at high ionic liquid uptake with conductivities above 1 mS/cm at 25 °C, keeping ordered morphologies. We used small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) to propose the correlation between domain spacing, the copolymer chain length (N) and the interaction parameter (χeff) in the block copolymers. We explored the potential of the electrolytes in two high voltage (3.0 V) device configurations, first using carbon nanotube (CNT) electrodes, with excellent electrical conductivity and high‐rate capability exhibiting a power density of 5.7 KW/kg at 4 A/g, while devices based on high surface area activated carbon exhibited high energy density of 20.7 Wh/kg at 4 A/g. Overall, both devices deliver superior specific energy and power densities than that of commercial state‐of‐the‐art supercapacitors, based on liquid electrolyte. Additionally, the CNT|Solid‐state|CNT device displays higher power density compared to the AC|Solid‐state|AC device, highlighting its better suitability for high power applications, while the AC|Solid‐state|AC device, is better suited for energy density applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM) and ARC Industry Training Transformation Centre for Future Energy Technologies (storEnergy) Deakin University 221 Burwood Highway Victoria 3125 Australia

POLYMAT, Applied Chemistry Department Faculty of Chemistry University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Donostia San Sebastián Spain

Center for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC EnergiGUNE) Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Parque Tecnológico de Alava Albert Einstein 48 01510 Vitoria-Gasteiz Spain

Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science 48013 Bilbao Spain

Multifunctional Materials Group Defence Science and Technology Group, Port Melbourne 3207 Australia

Funding

Australian Research Council

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang Y · J. Mater. Sci. 2020 56 : 1. · 2020 · 56 · 173
2. 10.1016/j.est.2018.03.01210.1016/j.est.2018.03.012 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.physe.2007.09.04410.1016/j.physe.2007.09.044 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.07.04910.1016/j.carbon.2020.07.049 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.01010.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.010 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0423610.1021/acsanm.1c04236 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0430110.1021/acsomega.2c04301 ↗
8. Zhang Y. · J Colloid Interface Sci. · 2022 · 606
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13147710.1016/j.cej.2021.131477 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10934-015-0087-610.1007/s10934-015-0087-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13718110.1016/j.electacta.2020.137181 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11203810.1016/j.molliq.2019.112038 ↗
13. Soomro A. M · Electronics (Switzerland). · 2022 · 11 · 2903
14. 10.1002/adfm.20120355610.1002/adfm.201203556 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.02510.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.025 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2023.11746910.1016/j.synthmet.2023.117469 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.09710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.097 ↗
18. 10.3390/gels904033810.3390/gels9040338 ↗
19. 10.1021/ma502234y10.1021/ma502234y ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.02310.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.023 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11106910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111069 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0004210.1021/acs.macromol.9b00042 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13523310.1016/j.electacta.2019.135233 ↗
24. 10.1021/mz300241g10.1021/mz300241g ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.09.02610.1016/j.polymer.2010.09.026 ↗
26. 10.1021/ma012222310.1021/ma0122223 ↗
27. 10.1002/polb.2480010.1002/polb.24800 ↗
28. 10.1021/ma011958x10.1021/ma011958x ↗
29. xGu · Macromolecules. · 2016 · 49
30. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0204110.1021/acs.macromol.5b02041 ↗
31. Wang J. Y · Macromolecules. · 2008 · 41
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1058210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22899610.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228996 ↗
34. Yang W. · J. Power Sources. · 2021 · 482
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13227310.1016/j.cej.2021.132273 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.02310.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.023 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20170047410.1002/adfm.201700474 ↗