Influences on Reliable Capacity Measurements of Hard Carbon in Highly Loaded Electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract For the development of a full‐cell battery system, typically appropriate cathodes and anodes are characterized within a half‐cell setup where a metal counter electrode is installed to gather data about the employed electrodes. Ultimately, the individual capacity loadings allow for suitable balancing of the anode to cathode capacity in the full‐cell. This approach seems rather unproblematic for lithium‐ion batteries. For sodium‐ion batteries, however, we show that the high reactivity of sodium metal strongly influences hard carbon‐based electrode measurements within sodium‐ion half‐cells. As hard carbon is considered state‐of‐the‐art anode material, the presented results have high impact on the development of sodium ion batteries. Specifically, we show that the type of electrolyte, as well as cell‐ and measurement‐setup are key factors for reliable sodium half‐cell measurements of hard carbon. The investigated hard carbon electrodes have a high active material loading of 7.2 mg/cm2 (with 93 % active material content) resulting in an areal capacity of 2.4 mAh/cm2, which represent application‐relevant conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Institute for Applied Materials (IAM) Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen Germany
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Institute for Applied Materials (IAM) Straße am Forum 7 76131 Karlsruhe Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Contribution of Working Groups I II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)) Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report 2023.
2. International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2021.
3.
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.24310.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.243 ↗
5. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0149410.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01494 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.04710.1016/j.rser.2018.03.047 ↗
7.
8. 10.1002/aenm.20200370010.1002/aenm.202003700 ↗
9. 10.1038/natrevmats.2018.1310.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20220263610.1002/aenm.202202636 ↗
11.
12. 10.3390/batteries501001010.3390/batteries5010010 ↗
13. 10.1002/batt.20210022410.1002/batt.202100224 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.139334810.1149/1.1393348 ↗
15.
16. 10.1002/aenm.20200385410.1002/aenm.202003854 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20170326810.1002/aenm.201703268 ↗
18. 10.1088/2516-1083/aba5f510.1088/2516-1083/aba5f5 ↗
19.
20. 10.1039/D0EE01363C10.1039/D0EE01363C ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20170323810.1002/aenm.201703238 ↗
22. Pirmin Stüble Cedric Müller Julian Klemens Philip Scharfer Wilhelm Schabel Marcel Häringer Joachim R. Binder Andreas Hofmann Anna Smith ChemRxiv2023 preprint: DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-jf6mq.10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-jf6mq ↗
23. 10.1002/cssc.20190105610.1002/cssc.201901056 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.06.00810.1016/j.elecom.2014.06.008 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0241310.1021/acsaem.1c02413 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7CC00301C10.1039/C7CC00301C ↗
27. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab75fd10.1149/1945-7111/ab75fd ↗
28.
29. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.01810.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.018 ↗
30. 10.1039/C9NR07545C10.1039/C9NR07545C ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13967010.1016/j.electacta.2021.139670 ↗
32. 10.1002/ente.20230033810.1002/ente.202300338 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.11710.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.117 ↗
34.
35. 10.1038/s41467-021-23368-610.1038/s41467-021-23368-6 ↗
36. 10.1039/C7CC09751D10.1039/C7CC09751D ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.1c0384410.1021/acsami.1c03844 ↗
38.
39. 10.1021/acsami.8b1323610.1021/acsami.8b13236 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.10.03810.1016/j.elecom.2012.10.038 ↗
41. 10.1149/2.0091514jes10.1149/2.0091514jes ↗