journal article·2020-02-24

Reactive Templated Grain Growth and Thermoelectric Power Factor Enhancement of Textured CuFeO2 Ceramics

Masahiko Tato, Rina Shimonishi, Manabu Hagiwara, Shinobu Fujihara

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 3· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The delafossite-type CuFeO2 (CFO) is a promising p-type thermoelectric oxide reported to show a large Seebeck coefficient, but the lack of a texturing method for CFO ceramics limits their thermoelectric performance. Here, we show that textured CFO ceramics with an enhanced thermoelectric power factor can be obtained by a facile process based on the reactive templated grain growth (RTGG) method. Nanorods of α-FeOOH were synthesized by a hydrothermal reaction and used as templates for the RTGG process. Textured CFO ceramics with a high c-axis orientation were obtained by ordinal uniaxial pressing of a mixed powder of the α-FeOOH nanorods and Cu2O particles and subsequent reaction sintering process. The best CFO ceramic with the highest orientation degree (Lotgering factor) of 0.71 was obtained at a sintering temperature of 1020 °C. It was found that textured CFO ceramics were formed through a topotactic conversion process via an intermediate α-Fe2O3 phase. The textured CFO ceramic showed a high in-plane electrical conductivity, leading to an enhanced thermoelectric power factor of 1.4 × 10–4 W m–1 K–2 at 700 K, which is the highest value ever reported for undoped CFO ceramics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.07010.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.070 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.10.00710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.10.007 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.R1268510.1103/PhysRevB.56.R12685 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.156233710.1063/1.1562337 ↗
5. Alves Dias, P.; Blagoeva, D.; Pavel, C.; Arvanitidis, N. Cobalt: Demand-Supply Balances in the Transition to Electric Mobility; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018.
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.31610.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.316 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0022-0248(97)00187-510.1016/S0022-0248(97)00187-5 ↗
8. 10.1143/JPSJ.67.402610.1143/JPSJ.67.4026 ↗
9. 10.1143/JJAP.46.522610.1143/JJAP.46.5226 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11664-010-1135-210.1007/s11664-010-1135-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.11310.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.113 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.477333510.1063/1.4773335 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jssc.2014.03.02710.1016/j.jssc.2014.03.027 ↗
14. 10.1039/B309804D10.1039/B309804D ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.04810.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.048 ↗
16. 10.1021/ic50098a01310.1021/ic50098a013 ↗
17. 10.1179/174367606X8165010.1179/174367606X81650 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10854-014-1804-710.1007/s10854-014-1804-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.04510.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.045 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.02010.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.020 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.489748910.1063/1.4897489 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b0429410.1021/acs.jpca.6b04294 ↗
23. 10.1016/0022-1902(60)80092-910.1016/0022-1902(60)80092-9 ↗
24. 10.1039/C4TA04863F10.1039/C4TA04863F ↗
25. 10.1016/0021-9797(80)90086-710.1016/0021-9797(80)90086-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2005.02.00210.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2005.02.002 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja043488310.1021/ja0434883 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11664-009-0775-610.1007/s11664-009-0775-6 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.133758710.1063/1.1337587 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.10.06010.1016/j.tsf.2004.10.060 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.686910.1103/PhysRevB.62.6869 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cocis.2009.05.00110.1016/j.cocis.2009.05.001 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.295910.1103/PhysRevB.16.2959 ↗