Fe-Based O2-Reduction Catalysts Synthesized Using Na2CO3 as a Pore-Inducing Agent
Source abstract
Abstract
The cost reductions required for the large-scale commercialization of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) could be achieved by substituting state-of-the-art PEFC cathode catalysts based on platinum with more abundant and affordable materials. In this context, this work presents a new approach for synthesizing Fe-based oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts using sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) as an inexpensive but effective pore-inducing agent offering microporosity control. By employing (scanning) transmission electron microscopy, a qualitative relation between the heat-treatment temperature and the formation of larger isolated Fe-based phases in particulate form was identified, mainly unveiling an effect of this variable on the Fe-speciation. Complementary bulk characterization, namely, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, on the other hand confirmed that the majority of the iron in the samples was present in single atomic sites. Electrochemical activity measurements in liquid environment as well as in a fuel cell demonstrate that the resulting materials display ORR-activities among the highest for this class of catalysts and synthesis conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrochemistry Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F?rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). International Energy Outlook 2017 Overview - Report Number: DOE/EIA-0484(2017); EIA: Washington, DC, 2017.
2. 10.1021/jz100553m10.1021/jz100553m ↗
3. 10.1149/2.0211514jes10.1149/2.0211514jes ↗
4. James B. D. · 2017
5. 10.1021/cs300086410.1021/cs3000864 ↗
6. 10.1002/9783527664900.ch210.1002/9783527664900.ch2 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0046210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms142710.1038/ncomms1427 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.150715911210.1073/pnas.1507159112 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms834310.1038/ncomms8343 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.00210.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.047 ↗
13. U.S. Department of Energy. DOE Technical Targets for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Components. See the following: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-polymer-electrolyte-membrane-fuel-cell-components (accessed Nov 6, 2018).
14. U.S. DRIVE-Fuel Cell Technical Team. Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap Hydrogen Storage Technologies Roadmap. 2017; pp 1–34.
15. Johnson Matthey - Platinum Price Chart. See the following: http://www.platinum.matthey.com/prices/price-charts# (accessed Nov 6, 2018).
16. 10.1126/science.aan225510.1126/science.aan2255 ↗
17. Sigma Aldrich US. See the following: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/united-states.html (accessed Nov 6, 2018).
18. 10.1002/cssc.20150168410.1002/cssc.201501684 ↗
19. 10.1002/cssc.20130014210.1002/cssc.201300142 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp809473e10.1021/jp809473e ↗
21. 10.1039/c2cp41957b10.1039/c2cp41957b ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat436710.1038/nmat4367 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41929-017-0008-y10.1038/s41929-017-0008-y ↗
24. 10.1039/C3TA13821F10.1039/C3TA13821F ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms1258210.1038/ncomms12582 ↗
26. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0064310.1021/acscatal.6b00643 ↗
27. 10.1039/c0jm03613g10.1039/c0jm03613g ↗
28. 10.1039/C0EE00011F10.1039/C0EE00011F ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms294410.1038/ncomms2944 ↗
30. 10.1149/1.183864210.1149/1.1838642 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.5b1101510.1021/jacs.5b11015 ↗
32. 10.1149/2.080401jes10.1149/2.080401jes ↗
33. 10.1149/1.178161110.1149/1.1781611 ↗
34. 10.1021/jp105997h10.1021/jp105997h ↗
35. 10.1021/am900219g10.1021/am900219g ↗
36. 10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
37. ICSD database. See the following: https://icsd.fiz-karlsruhe.de/search/basic.xhtml (accessed Nov 21, 2018).
38. 10.1021/jp057135h10.1021/jp057135h ↗
39. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.03.04510.1016/j.electacta.2007.03.045 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp063902g10.1021/jp063902g ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.09.01210.1016/j.electacta.2005.09.012 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.6b1341710.1021/acsami.6b13417 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20140035810.1002/anie.201400358 ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20120495810.1002/anie.201204958 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.10.01710.1016/j.cattod.2015.10.017 ↗
46. Newville, M. FEFFIT - Using FEFF to model XAFS data. See the following: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/ifeffit/Documentation (accessed Jan 10, 2019).
47. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.05710.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.057 ↗
48. 10.1021/jp204252610.1021/jp2042526 ↗
49. 10.1149/2.0531802jes10.1149/2.0531802jes ↗
50. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.03810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.038 ↗
51. 10.1002/anie.20170425310.1002/anie.201704253 ↗
52. 10.1039/C7EE02302B10.1039/C7EE02302B ↗
53. 10.1149/2.1091506jes10.1149/2.1091506jes ↗
54. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.04.01010.1016/j.coelec.2018.04.010 ↗
55. 10.1039/C5TA05794A10.1039/C5TA05794A ↗
56. 10.1149/1.321059810.1149/1.3210598 ↗
57. 10.1002/anie.20130292410.1002/anie.201302924 ↗
58. 10.1002/anie.20150315910.1002/anie.201503159 ↗