journal article·2021-02-22Open access

Operando X-ray Tomography Imaging of Solid-State Electrolyte Response to Li Evolution under Realistic Operating Conditions

Natalie Seitzman, Olivia F. Bird, Rory Andrykowski, Steve Robbins, Mowafak M. Al-Jassim, Svitlana Pylypenko

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 2

Abstract

Solid-state Li-ion conductors are a next-generation battery technology that are particularly promising for electric vehicles, offering the capacitive benefits of Li metal anodes with nonflammable electrolytes. Microstructural evolution in these solid-state batteries, especially the Li anode, requires deeper understanding of the conditions under which certain undesired behaviors are more likely to occur. This study utilizes operando X-ray computed tomography to visualize the behavior of lithium in response to device operation, considering variables that are relevant to a realistic battery: stack pressure, microscale defects such as pores, and temperature. This work demonstrates that experimental and operational conditions, especially temperature, affect the fundamental driving forces of realistic solid electrolyte systems and provides visual insight into possible mechanisms of Li migration. In particular, the effect of these variables on Li propagation from the anode through pre-existing defects and Li nucleation within the imperfectly electron-insulating electrolyte is highlighted.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · Colorado School of Mines · Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists · National Renewable Energy Laboratory

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41563-020-0655-210.1038/s41563-020-0655-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.03.01510.1016/j.matt.2020.03.015 ↗
4. 10.1021/jacs.7b0953110.1021/jacs.7b09531 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.02.00310.1016/j.matt.2020.02.003 ↗
6. 10.1039/c9cs00883g10.1039/c9cs00883g ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0024910.1021/acsenergylett.8b00249 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20170100310.1002/aenm.201701003 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.0841704jes10.1149/2.0841704jes ↗
10. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.01810.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.018 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
12. 10.1039/c8ee00540k10.1039/c8ee00540k ↗
13. 10.1039/c7ta10622j10.1039/c7ta10622j ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0021510.1021/acsenergylett.0c00215 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20207009710.1002/aenm.202070097 ↗
16. 10.1039/c3cp51059j10.1039/c3cp51059j ↗
17. 10.5796/electrochemistry.82.36410.5796/electrochemistry.82.364 ↗
18. 10.1002/jemt.2267510.1002/jemt.22675 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0009310.1021/acsenergylett.9b00093 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0111910.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01119 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0081610.1021/acsenergylett.9b00816 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22816010.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228160 ↗
23. 10.1149/2.0301816jes10.1149/2.0301816jes ↗
24. 10.1039/c8ta08821g10.1039/c8ta08821g ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.8b1329710.1021/jacs.8b13297 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20190325310.1002/aenm.201903253 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
28. 10.1021/ja311089510.1021/ja3110895 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.22710.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.227 ↗
30. 10.1139/p54-07610.1139/p54-076 ↗
31. 10.1149/2.0221902jes10.1149/2.0221902jes ↗
32. 10.1038/srep0226110.1038/srep02261 ↗