Design and Operation of Copper-Based Heterogeneous Catalysts for CO2 Conversion to Methanol Using Extreme Gradient Boosting
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Copper-based catalysts are widely utilized as active metals in the hydrogenation of CO 2 to methanol due to their high activity and selectivity. However, optimizing the catalyst design (i.e., material design) and operating conditions for such systems remains challenging; as a result, the optimization processes may potentially generate more CO 2 than it reduces. To mitigate this issue, machine learning has emerged as a powerful tool, offering intelligent prediction capabilities and insightful analysis of catalyst systems. In this approach, key parameters were classified into two primary categories: catalyst composition and operating conditions. A comprehensive data set was compiled from the literature (698 data points), covering a range of Cu-based catalysts with various supports, promoters, and catalyst surface areas, as well as reaction conditions. This data set was used to train 12 different machine learning models, including linear models, tree-based models, and others, with hyperparameter tuning conducted via GridSearch and 10-fold cross-validation. Among these, the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the highest performance, with an R 2 of 0.89 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.131. The feature importance was analyzed using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) and further supported by FPI (Feature Permutation Importance) and PDP (Partial Dependence Plot) analysis. The results indicated that approximately 60% of the influence on STY (space-time yield) is attributed to reaction conditions, while 40% relates to catalyst composition. The ranked importance of features affecting STY is determined as follows: GHSV > Cu loading > SBET > temperature > pressure > H 2 /CO 2 ratio > promoter > support. This approach, leveraging the XGBoost model, provided a systematic and data-driven framework for understanding and optimizing Cu-based catalysts in a heterogeneous system design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Integrated Science and Innovation, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology (SIIT)
Thammasat University
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science
Kasetsart University
School of Bio-Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology
Research Unit in Sustainable Electrochemical Intelligent
Funding
Research Unit in Sustainable Electrochemical Intelligent, Thammasat University (RU-SEI) · SIIT Young Researcher Grant
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.spc.2017.10.00110.1016/j.spc.2017.10.001 ↗
2. 10.3390/molecules2711336710.3390/molecules27113367 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.seta.2022.10262310.1016/j.seta.2022.102623 ↗
4. Muradov N. · 2015 · 48910.1016/B978-1-78242-361-4.00017-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mcat.2022.11251210.1016/j.mcat.2022.112512 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0GC03506H10.1039/D0GC03506H ↗
7. Ji S. · 2018 · 73010.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.13324-4 ↗
8. Busca G. · 2014 · 29710.1016/B978-0-444-59524-9.00009-2 ↗
9. 10.1039/D2SE00050D10.1039/D2SE00050D ↗
10. 10.1016/s0167-2991(06)80924-910.1016/s0167-2991(06)80924-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/b978-0-444-53202-2.50047-610.1016/b978-0-444-53202-2.50047-6 ↗
12. Avci A. K. · 2018 · 47510.1016/B978-0-12-809597-3.00235-2 ↗
13. 10.3390/pr1103071910.3390/pr11030719 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.01510.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.015 ↗
15. 10.1039/C2CY20604H10.1039/C2CY20604H ↗
16. 10.1021/cs500979c10.1021/cs500979c ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mcat.2020.11077610.1016/j.mcat.2020.110776 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.07.02110.1016/j.apcatb.2006.07.021 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10562-009-9847-810.1007/s10562-009-9847-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11898710.1016/j.fuel.2020.118987 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.04.03810.1016/j.cattod.2011.04.038 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.05310.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.053 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.06610.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.066 ↗
24. 10.3390/molecules3002022510.3390/molecules30020225 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.10261710.1016/j.jcou.2023.102617 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0466210.1021/acs.iecr.6b04662 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0768210.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07682 ↗
28. 10.1039/D3RA01502E10.1039/D3RA01502E ↗
29. 10.1016/s0167-2991(04)80215-510.1016/s0167-2991(04)80215-5 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jestch.2023.10145510.1016/j.jestch.2023.101455 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.10569710.1016/j.engappai.2022.105697 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.10203410.1016/j.jcou.2022.102034 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mcat.2023.11336610.1016/j.mcat.2023.113366 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2024.11219710.1016/j.chemphys.2024.112197 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12153010.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121530 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12457610.1016/j.seppur.2023.124576 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matre.2021.10004610.1016/j.matre.2021.100046 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.10528710.1016/j.engappai.2022.105287 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.05610.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.056 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.clet.2023.10066410.1016/j.clet.2023.100664 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11273710.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112737 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c0235910.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c02359 ↗
43. Belyadi H. · 2021 · 16910.1016/B978-0-12-821929-4.00004-4 ↗
44. 10.1016/b978-0-323-88506-5.50112-110.1016/b978-0-323-88506-5.50112-1 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10333910.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103339 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.10755510.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107555 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.11915010.1016/j.eswa.2022.119150 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41598-023-49262-310.1038/s41598-023-49262-3 ↗
49. 10.48550/arXiv.2405.2039710.48550/arXiv.2405.20397 ↗
50. 10.1002/cctc.20210049510.1002/cctc.202100495 ↗
51. 10.1039/D4RA00406J10.1039/D4RA00406J ↗
52. 10.1016/j.dche.2024.10020210.1016/j.dche.2024.100202 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0787610.1021/acs.jpcc.2c07876 ↗
54. 10.48550/arXiv.2109.0143310.48550/arXiv.2109.01433 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.flatc.2025.10082710.1016/j.flatc.2025.100827 ↗
56. Muraina, I. Ideal Dataset Splitting Ratios in Machine Iearningalgorithms: General Concerns for Data Scientists and Data Analysts In 7th International Mardin Artuklu Scientific Research Conference, 2022, p 496.
57. 10.3390/catal1408047010.3390/catal14080470 ↗
58. 10.1023/A:101901470167410.1023/A:1019014701674 ↗
59. 10.1002/cctc.20200019510.1002/cctc.202000195 ↗
60. 10.47672/jchem.251310.47672/jchem.2513 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12602710.1016/j.fuel.2022.126027 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12368910.1016/j.fuel.2022.123689 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.catcom.2022.10654310.1016/j.catcom.2022.106543 ↗
64. 10.1007/s11837-025-07200-w10.1007/s11837-025-07200-w ↗
65. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.35210.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.352 ↗
66. 10.1002/cctc.20230067910.1002/cctc.202300679 ↗