Overcurrent Abuse of Primary Prismatic Zinc–Air Battery Cells Studying Air Supply Effects on Performance and Safety Shut-Down
Source abstract
Abstract
Overcurrent abuse has been performed on commercial 48 Ah primary prismatic zinc (Zn)–Air battery cells with full air supply as well as with shut-off air supply. Compared to other battery technologies, e.g., lithium-ion batteries, metal–air batteries offer the possibility to physically stop the battery operation by stopping its air supply, thus offering an additional protection against severe battery damage in the case of, e.g., an accidental short circuit. This method may also reduce the electrical hazard in a larger battery system since, by stopping the air supply, the voltage can be brought to zero while maintaining the energy capacity of the battery. Measurements of overdischarge currents and current cut-off by suffocation have been performed to assess the safety of this type of Zn–air battery. The time to get to zero battery voltage is shown to mainly be determined by the volume of air trapped in the cell.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivagen 9, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
Electronics, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Brinellgatan 4, SE-50115 Borås, Sweden
Volvo Group Trucks Technology, Sven Hultins gata 9, SE-41288 Gothenburg, Sweden
Department of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Fysikgarden 1, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Metal–air batteries with high energy density: Li–air versus Zn–air10.1002/aenm.201000010 ↗
2. Recent advances in zinc–air batteries10.1039/C4CS00015C ↗
3. Abuse by external heating, overcharge and short circuiting of commercial lithium-ion battery cells10.1149/2.0311410jes ↗
4. Larsson, F., Andersson, P., and Mellander, B.-E. (2016). Lithium-ion battery aspects on fires in electrified vehicles on the basis of experimental abuse tests. Batteries, 2.10.3390/batteries2020009 ↗
5. Characteristics of lithium-ion batteries during fire tests10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.027 ↗
6. Thermal modelling of cell-to-cell fire propagation and cascading thermal runaway failure effects for lithium-ion battery cells and modules using fire walls10.1149/2.0131614jes ↗
7. U.S. Department of Transportation Risks of Fire or Explosion when Transporting Lithium Ion or Lithium Metal Batteries as Cargo on Passenger and Cargo Aircraft, Available online:https://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_safety/safo/all_safos/media/2016/SAFO16001.pdf.
8. Challenges facing lithium batteries and electrical double-layer capacitors10.1002/anie.201201429 ↗
9. High energy density metal-air batteries: A review10.1149/2.062310jes ↗
10. Advanced zinc-air batteries based on high-performance hybrid electrocatalysts10.1038/ncomms2812 ↗
11. Development and characterization of an electrically rechargeable zinc-air battery stack10.3390/en7106549 ↗
12. Review—Development of diagnostic process for commercially available batteries, especially lithium ion battery, by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy10.1149/2.0141514jes ↗
13. Performance of zinc air batteries with added K2CO3 in the alkaline electrolyte10.1007/s10800-015-0817-0 ↗