journal article·2025-11-24Open access

Revealing the Mg-Ion Storage Mechanism within a Covalent Organic Framework Electrode

Matthew A. Wright, Alex R. Neale, Andrés Acín-Lalanza, Hui Gao, Matthew J. Rosseinsky, Andrew I. Cooper, Laurence J. Hardwick

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 8· Issue 22

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Magnesium batteries offer a promising alternative to lithium-ion systems, but suitable electrodes remain limited. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are attractive candidates due to their structural tunability and open channels for ion transport. We report a pyrene- 4,5,9,10-tetraone COF composite with carbon nanotubes as a Mg electrode, delivering 70 mAh g –1 at 200 mA g –1 and operating at 1.3 V. In situ Raman spectroscopy confirms carbonyl-centered redox on pyrene tetraone, supporting a Mg 2+ -driven carbonyl reduction. Compared with Li +, only partial carbonyl utilization occurs, attributed to steric and electrostatic constraints of divalent Mg 2+ . This incomplete conversion to magnesium-enolate inspires future work toward structural optimization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Catalysis for Biomass Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

University of Liverpool

Materials Innovation Factory

Stephenson Institute for Renewable Energy

The Faraday Institution, Harwell Campus, Didcot OX11 ORA, United Kingdom

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Faraday Institution

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
3. 10.1021/cm901649710.1021/cm9016497 ↗
4. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1310.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
5. 10.1038/3503755310.1038/35037553 ↗
6. 10.1021/jacs.0c0822210.1021/jacs.0c08222 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20240083710.1002/anie.202400837 ↗
8. 10.1039/D4TA04469J10.1039/D4TA04469J ↗
9. 10.1039/C6CC05363G10.1039/C6CC05363G ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2006.01.01310.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2006.01.013 ↗
11. 10.1002/chem.20210022310.1002/chem.202100223 ↗
12. 10.1002/aenm.20160014010.1002/aenm.201600140 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.02210.1016/j.joule.2018.11.022 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.112041110.1126/science.1120411 ↗
15. 10.1038/srep0822510.1038/srep08225 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.12324710.1016/j.memsci.2024.123247 ↗
17. 10.1246/bcsj.2020038910.1246/bcsj.20200389 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.8b1355110.1021/jacs.8b13551 ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.3c0113110.1021/jacs.3c01131 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0104010.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01040 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.03310.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.033 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20220319310.1002/aenm.202203193 ↗
23. 10.1039/D3TA05190K10.1039/D3TA05190K ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20110620310.1002/anie.201106203 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.02110.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.021 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20210188010.1002/aenm.202101880 ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.2c0219610.1021/jacs.2c02196 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.abg395410.1126/science.abg3954 ↗
29. 10.1039/C2EE23686A10.1039/C2EE23686A ↗
30. 10.1038/s41467-017-00431-910.1038/s41467-017-00431-9 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja409421d10.1021/ja409421d ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.9b0814710.1021/jacs.9b08147 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8CS00319J10.1039/C8CS00319J ↗
34. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10131310.1016/j.surfin.2021.101313 ↗