journal article·2025-07-14Open access

Enhancing Reproducibility and Uniformity of RDEs: Spray-Coating vs Drop-Casting for IrO2 OER Catalyst

Worawee Saei, Ilias Stamatelos, Fabian Scheepers, Joachim Pasel, Carsten Korte

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 8· Issue 13

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The thin-film rotating disk electrode (TF-RDE) technique is widely used for catalyst screening in oxygen evolution reaction (OER) studies due to its ability to separate mass transport from redox kinetics and its low catalyst requirement. However, the manual drop-casting method frequently yields unsatisfactory reproducibility, primarily due to the “coffee-ring” effect, caused by nonuniform catalyst distribution, leading to inconsistent measurements. This study proposes an automated spray-coating method for depositing commercial iridium oxide (IrO 2 ) nanoparticles on RDEs as a reliable alternative. Spray-coating ensures uniform catalyst layers, significantly improving the reproducibility in electrochemical measurements. A comparison of the morphology and the electrochemical properties of the catalyst layers prepared by both methods identifies the sources of the performance variations. Requiring minimal catalyst loading (0.10 mg cm –2 ), spray-coating establishes a standardized approach for OER catalyst evaluation, offering improved consistency and accuracy in electrochemical characterization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Energy Technologies, Electrochemical Process Engineering (IET-4)

RWTH Aachen University

Funding

Forschungszentrum Jülich

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jacs.8b0454610.1021/jacs.8b04546 ↗
2. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0326010.1021/acscatal.1c03260 ↗
3. 10.1039/D1TA03732C10.1039/D1TA03732C ↗
4. 10.1038/s41929-022-00776-510.1038/s41929-022-00776-5 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b0269710.1021/acs.analchem.8b02697 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.11511510.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115115 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.02110.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 ↗
8. 10.3791/57105-v10.3791/57105-v ↗
9. 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.10686710.1016/j.elecom.2020.106867 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep2462810.1038/srep24628 ↗
11. 10.1039/D3YA00340J10.1039/D3YA00340J ↗
12. 10.1021/ac100306c10.1021/ac100306c ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.14010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.140 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.01610.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.016 ↗
15. 10.3389/fenrg.2022.85766310.3389/fenrg.2022.857663 ↗
16. 10.1039/C8SC03302A10.1039/C8SC03302A ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0551512jes10.1149/2.0551512jes ↗
18. 10.1038/550466a10.1038/550466a ↗
19. 10.3390/membranes1305052210.3390/membranes13050522 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22751610.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227516 ↗
21. Moosbauer D. J. · 2018
22. 10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00407-110.1016/S0022-0728(00)00407-1 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c0083110.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c00831 ↗