Early Detection of Short-Term Performance Degradation in Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries via Physics-Guided Multi-Sensor Fusion and Deep Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Early detection of battery degradation is essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of electric vehicle (EV) systems under real-world operating variability. This paper proposes a physics-guided multi-sensor learning framework, termed SensorFusion-Former (SFF), for early warning of short-term EV battery performance degradation. The proposed approach integrates a physics-based baseline model for operational normalization, a multi-sensor fusion attention mechanism to model cross-modality interactions, and a lightweight transformer architecture for efficient temporal representation learning. Weak supervision is derived from physics-consistent residual analysis with temporal smoothing, enabling scalable training without dense manual annotations. To support reliable deployment, evidential uncertainty modeling and conformal calibration are incorporated to obtain statistically controlled decision thresholds. Experiments conducted on a real driving cycle dataset from IEEE DataPort demonstrate that SFF consistently outperforms classical machine learning methods, deep neural networks, and standard transformer models in terms of early-warning lead time, false alarm rate, and inference efficiency while maintaining competitive discriminative performance. Cross-scenario evaluations under diverse thermal conditions further confirm the robustness and generalization capability of the proposed framework.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Information Technology and Management Program, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan City 33321, Taiwan
Funding
National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan ROC
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. A comprehensive review of an electric vehicle based on the existing technologies and challenges10.1002/est2.70000 ↗
2. Madani, S.S., Shabeer, Y., Allard, F., Fowler, M., Ziebert, C., Wang, Z., Panchal, S., Chaoui, H., Mekhilef, S., and Dou, S.X. (2025). A comprehensive review on lithium-ion battery lifetime prediction and aging mechanism analysis. Batteries, 11.10.3390/batteries11040127 ↗
3. Rahman, T., and Alharbi, T. (2024). Exploring lithium-Ion battery degradation: A concise review of critical factors, impacts, data-driven degradation estimation techniques, and sustainable directions for energy storage systems. Batteries, 10.10.3390/batteries10070220 ↗
4. Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries health state based on adaptive mode decomposition and long short-term memory neural network10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107317 ↗
5. Physics-based equivalent circuit model for lithium-ion cells via reduction and approximation of electrochemical model10.4271/2022-01-0701 ↗
6. SOH estimation method for lithium-ion batteries based on an improved equivalent circuit model via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy10.1016/j.est.2024.111167 ↗
7. Sheikh, S.S., Anjum, M., Khan, M.A., Hassan, S.A., Khalid, H.A., Gastli, A., and Ben-Brahim, L. (2020). A battery health monitoring method using machine learning: A data-driven approach. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13143658 ↗
8. Samanta, A., Chowdhuri, S., and Williamson, S.S. (2021). Machine learning-based data-driven fault detection/diagnosis of lithium-ion battery: A critical review. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10111309 ↗
9. Hybrid physics and data-driven electrochemical states estimation for lithium-ion batteries10.1109/TEC.2024.3386784 ↗
10. Integrating physics-based modeling with machine learning for lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120289 ↗
11. Li, D.C., Felix, J.R., Chin, Y.L., Jusuf, L.V., and Susanto, L.J. (2024). Integrated extended Kalman filter and deep learning platform for electric vehicle battery health prediction. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114354 ↗
12. An electrochemical model based degradation state identification method of Lithium-ion battery for all-climate electric vehicles application10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.053 ↗
13. Lithium ion battery degradation: What you need to know10.1039/D1CP00359C ↗
14. A continuum of physics-based lithium-ion battery models reviewed10.1088/2516-1083/ac7d31 ↗
15. Enabling early detection of lithium-ion battery degradation by linking electrochemical properties to equivalent circuit model parameters10.1016/j.est.2022.104213 ↗
16. Constructing battery impedance spectroscopy using partial current in constant-voltage charging or partial relaxation voltage10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122454 ↗
17. Developing a real-time data-driven battery health diagnosis method, using time and frequency domain condition indicators10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113813 ↗
18. Random forest regression for online capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.182 ↗
19. State of charge and state of health estimation for lithium batteries using recurrent neural networks10.1109/TVT.2017.2715333 ↗
20. Remaining useful life prediction of the lithium-ion battery based on CNN-LSTM fusion model and grey relational analysis10.3934/era.2023031 ↗
21. Capacity degradation prediction of electric vehicle battery by integrating convolutional neural network with informer model10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.237497 ↗
22. Realistic fault detection of li-ion battery via dynamical deep learning10.1038/s41467-023-41226-5 ↗
23. Fault detection for Li-ion batteries of electric vehicles with feature-augmented attentional autoencoder10.1038/s41598-025-03227-w ↗
24. A deep learning approach incorporating attention mechanism and transfer learning for lithium-ion battery lifespan prediction10.1016/j.est.2023.109647 ↗
25. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium batteries based on jump connection multi-scale CNN10.1038/s41598-025-08619-6 ↗
26. The application of data-driven methods and physics-based learning for improving battery safety10.1016/j.joule.2020.11.018 ↗
27. Anomaly detection method for lithium-ion battery cells based on time series decomposition and improved manhattan distance algorithm10.1021/acsomega.3c06796 ↗
28. Multi-modal framework for battery state of health evaluation using open-source electric vehicle data10.1038/s41467-025-56485-7 ↗
29. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA. Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf.
30. State of health estimation of electric vehicle batteries using transformer-based neural network10.1115/1.4065762 ↗
31. Collaborative framework of Transformer and LSTM for enhanced state-of-charge estimation in lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.energy.2025.135548 ↗
32. Multi-source data-driven short-term remaining driving range prediction for electric vehicles: A hybrid CNN-transformer framework10.1016/j.energy.2025.137564 ↗
33. A novel state-of-health estimation for the lithium-ion battery using a convolutional neural network and transformer model10.1016/j.energy.2022.125501 ↗
34. A review of predictive uncertainty estimation with machine learning10.1007/s10462-023-10698-8 ↗
35. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on Monte Carlo Dropout and gated recurrent unit10.1016/j.egyr.2021.05.019 ↗
36. A framework for Li-ion battery prognosis based on hybrid Bayesian physics-informed neural networks10.1038/s41598-023-33018-0 ↗
37. A hybrid framework for predicting the remaining useful life of battery using Gaussian process regression10.1016/j.est.2023.107513 ↗
38. Probabilistic lithium-ion battery state-of-health prediction using convolutional neural networks and Gaussian process regression10.1016/j.est.2023.109799 ↗
39. Amara-Ouali, Y., Hamrouche, B., Principato, G., and Goude, Y. (2025). Quantifying the Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Charging with Probabilistic Load Forecasting. World Electr. Veh. J., 16.10.3390/wevj16020088 ↗
40. Prediction of SOH and RUL for Li-Ion Batteries in EV Based on AttentiveLSTM Multi-Task Model10.1109/JESTIE.2025.3576185 ↗
41. Uncertainty quantification in automated valuation models with spatially weighted conformal prediction10.1007/s41060-025-00862-4 ↗
42. Conformal prediction with local weights: Randomization enables robust guarantees10.1093/jrsssb/qkae103 ↗
43. Shamarova, N., Suslov, K., Ilyushin, P., and Shushpanov, I. (2022). Review of battery energy storage systems modeling in microgrids with renewables considering battery degradation. Energies, 15.10.2139/ssrn.4288117 ↗
44. Adaptive dynamic correction factor-extended Kalman filtering method for precise state of charge estimation with enhanced temperature viability for lithium-ion batteries10.1007/s11581-025-06341-x ↗
45. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z ↗
46. A Generic physics-informed machine learning framework for battery remaining useful life prediction using small early-stage lifecycle data10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125314 ↗
47. Murgai, S. (2024). Modeling and Forecasting Battery Degradation using Scientific Machine Learning for Sustainability. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conference (URTC), IEEE.10.1109/URTC65039.2024.10937563 ↗
48. Enhanced SOC Estimation for LFP Batteries: A Synergistic Approach Using Coulomb Counting Reset, Machine Learning, and Relaxation10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03223 ↗
49. Choromanski, K., Likhosherstov, V., Dohan, D., Song, X., Gane, A., Sarlos, T., Hawkins, P., Davis, J., Mohiuddin, A., and Kaiser, L. (2020). Rethinking attention with performers. arXiv.
50. Kitaev, N., Kaiser, Ł., and Levskaya, A. (2020). Reformer: The efficient transformer. arXiv.
51. Wang, S., Li, B.Z., Khabsa, M., Fang, H., and Ma, H. (2020). Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity. arXiv.
52. Katharopoulos, A., Vyas, A., Pappas, N., and Fleuret, F. (2020). Transformers are rnns: Fast autoregressive transformers with linear attention. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR.
53. Alavi, A., Stöcker, P., Wittich, M., Köhler, M., and Koch, C. (2021). Battery and Heating Data in Real Driving Cycles. IEEE Dataport, Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/atechnohazard/battery-and-heating-data-in-real-driving-cycles.