journal article·2024-01-22

Impact of Nonuniform Platinum Loading Distribution Design in the Catalyst Layer on the High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance

Ruihang Xu, Xiwen Deng, Enming Zhang, Jilin Lei, Yi Liu

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 7· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

High-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs) are efficient and environmentally friendly energy conversion devices, and the performance and cost of the cells are influenced by the platinum loading in the catalytic layer. In this study, finite element analysis was used to determine the effective reaction thickness of the anode and cathode catalytic layers and to propose a novel platinum loading distribution to reduce costs while ensuring the cell performance. The research results indicate that platinum loading has a significant impact on the cell performance, particularly at the cathode. Furthermore, adopting higher platinum loading in the effective reaction thickness region and lower loading in the noneffective reaction thickness region can effectively reduce the platinum usage while maintaining the fuel cell performance. Specifically, when the platinum loading is 0.30 mg/cm 2 in the effective reaction thickness region and 0.025 mg/cm 2 in the noneffective reaction thickness region, the cell performance remains unchanged, and the total platinum usage decreases by 46%. This provides valuable insights into the design of catalytic layers in HT-PEMFCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Yunnan Key Laboratory of Internal Combustion Engines, Kunming University of Science and Technology Kunming, Kunming 650500, P. R. China

Funding

Major Science and Technology Projects in Yunnan Province · Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3507353610.1038/35073536 ↗
2. 10.1149/1.161998410.1149/1.1619984 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.02410.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.024 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.02910.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.029 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.21110.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.211 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.01.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.01.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.03210.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.032 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.272900210.1149/1.2729002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.034 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.02910.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.029 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.00910.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.009 ↗
12. Andreasen, S. J.; Vang, J. R.; Kær, S. K. Experimental analysis of the effects of CO and CO2 on high temperature PEM fuel cell performance using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. 2nd CARISMA International Conference on Progress in MEA Materials for High Medium and High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells, 2010.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.076 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.10310.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.103 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.21010.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.210 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.06910.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.069 ↗
16. 10.1002/fuce.20130007010.1002/fuce.201300070 ↗
17. 10.1039/c2jm30217a10.1039/c2jm30217a ↗
18. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14091810.1016/j.electacta.2022.140918 ↗
19. Wei, M.; Lipman, T.; Mayyas, A.; Chien, J.; Chan, S. H.; Gosselin, D.; Breunig, H.; Stadler, M.; Mckone, T.; Beattie, P.; Chong, P.; Colella, W.; James, B. A Total Cost of Ownership Model for Low Temperature PEM Fuel Cells in Combined Heat and Power and Backup Power Applications (No. LBNL-6772E); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.(LBNL): Berkeley, CA (United States), 2014.
20. 10.1038/nature1111510.1038/nature11115 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20170412310.1002/adma.201704123 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5CS00302D10.1039/C5CS00302D ↗
23. 10.1080/15583724.2019.166321110.1080/15583724.2019.1663211 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20180223410.1002/adma.201802234 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0021610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.09.02510.1016/j.matt.2020.09.025 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10800-007-9414-110.1007/s10800-007-9414-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.17910.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.179 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.03110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.031 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.07310.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.073 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.03510.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.035 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.12.00910.1016/j.electacta.2004.12.009 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.11410.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.114 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.06.02710.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.06.027 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22984410.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229844 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.08.00210.1016/j.enconman.2005.08.002 ↗
37. 10.1115/1.203910810.1115/1.2039108 ↗
38. 10.1016/0017-9310(96)00036-110.1016/0017-9310(96)00036-1 ↗
39. 10.1115/1.142429810.1115/1.1424298 ↗
40. 10.1016/0017-9310(81)90027-210.1016/0017-9310(81)90027-2 ↗
41. Kaviany M. · 2012
42. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00369-510.1016/S0378-7753(02)00369-5 ↗
43. 10.1002/er.386710.1002/er.3867 ↗
44. 10.1149/1.320330910.1149/1.3203309 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22842710.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228427 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11701210.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117012 ↗
47. Mench M. M. · 200810.1002/9780470209769 ↗
48. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.662.26610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.662.266 ↗