journal article·2025-06-23Open access

Influence of Curing Temperature on the Synthesis of a Phosphate-Waste-Based Geopolymer for CO2 Capture and Separation

Mariana Schneider, Denise Gomes da Silva Costa, Enrique Rodríguez-Castellón, M. Olga Guerrero-Pérez, Dachamir Hotza, Agenor De Noni, Regina de F. P. M. Moreira

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 8· Issue 12

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide A promising approach to combating global warming is the capture, storage, and reuse of greenhouse gas emissions. Adsorption processes can capture up to 90% of the CO 2 emissions. However, CO 2 storage requires significant investment and may not always be feasible, making it essential to improve capture efficiency and reduce costs. Geopolymeric adsorbents have shown potential for separating CO 2 from gaseous mixtures. Additionally, captured CO 2 can be utilized in processes such as electrochemical reduction, photocatalytic reduction, and catalytic methanation. This study compares the potential of four geopolymers synthesized from phosphate waste and metakaolin as precursors under different curing conditions by analyzing the adsorption equilibrium isotherms of CO 2, H 2, and CO at various temperatures. The samples were characterized using XRF, XRD, FTIR, SEM, EDS, XPS, NMR, micro-CT, density, BET surface area, and porosity analyses. The best performance was observed for the submerged samples, which exhibited a CO 2 adsorption capacity of 2.24 mmol/g at 80 °C and 2.00 mmol/g at 65 °C, highlighting the significance of the submerged-cured process. BET surface area analysis revealed values of 301 and 337 m 2 /g for the submerged G65s and G80s samples, with corresponding porosity values of ∼0.130 cm 3 /g. Additionally, FTIR and NMR analyses confirmed the successful geopolymerization and identified key aluminosilicate peaks. These findings highlight the potential of industrial waste-based geopolymers as sustainable and cost-effective adsorbents for CO 2 separation, with key characteristics such as reusability and compatibility with cyclical processes further enhancing their suitability for practical applications in gas separation technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Food Engineering

Federal University of Santa Catarina

Department of Inorganic Chemistry Faculty of Sciences

University of Málaga

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Sciences

Funding

European Regional Development Fund · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico · Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnolog?a e Innovaci?n · Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10098-023-02599-910.1007/s10098-023-02599-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12984310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129843 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10937010.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109370 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0360510.1021/acsaem.2c03605 ↗
6. Silveira, A. R. D. Desenvolvimento de Materiais Compósitos Geopolímero-Zeólita Derivados de resíduos Industriais Para Adsorção de CO2; Federal University of Santa Catarina: Florianópolis, 2021.
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.05010.1016/j.cej.2018.02.050 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.15996610.1016/j.cej.2025.159966 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jiec.2024.03.04910.1016/j.jiec.2024.03.049 ↗
10. 10.3390/nano1416134010.3390/nano14161340 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcou.2013.03.00210.1016/j.jcou.2013.03.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.210810.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2108 ↗
13. Pinto, A. T. Introduction to the Study of Geopolymers, (UTAD, Ed.). University of Trás-Os-Montes and Alto Douro. Vila Real, 2006.
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10935510.1016/j.matdes.2020.109355 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10386110.1016/j.autcon.2021.103861 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12918010.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129180 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.02210.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.022 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12291710.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122917 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.08610.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.086 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.01.03210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.01.032 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.12.03110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.12.031 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.12.27010.1016/j.ceramint.2024.12.270 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.reffit.2015.06.00710.1016/j.reffit.2015.06.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.10.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.10.035 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.04.01310.1016/j.ces.2016.04.013 ↗
26. 10.3390/membranes1411022810.3390/membranes14110228 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.04.01310.1016/j.ces.2016.04.013 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11028210.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110282 ↗
29. Freire, A. L. Synthesis Characterization and Application of Geopolymers Based on Phosphate Tailings in Carbon Capture Sequestration; Qualification project, Federal University of Santa Catarina: Florianópolis, 2022.
30. Souza, G. S. Desenvolvimento de Compósito Zeólita Na-LTA/Polidimetilsiloxano Aplicado para Separação CO2/N2 por Adsorção; Federal University of Santa Catarina: Florianópolis, 2021.
31. 10.1021/acs.jced.9b0069010.1021/acs.jced.9b00690 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10450-024-00569-110.1007/s10450-024-00569-1 ↗
33. Davidovits J. · J. Mater. Educ. · 1994 · 16 · 91
34. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12235910.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122359 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.02.02710.1016/j.molstruc.2016.02.027 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10934-012-9631-910.1007/s10934-012-9631-9 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10434510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104345 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.06610.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.066 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.29110.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.291 ↗
40. 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.91110.3934/matersci.2019.6.911 ↗
41. Moulder J. F. · 1992
42. 10.1039/c3tb21599g10.1039/c3tb21599g ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.05.01310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.05.013 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.clay.2022.10678610.1016/j.clay.2022.106786 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.02110.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.021 ↗
46. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03906.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03906.x ↗
47. 10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00499-510.1016/S0927-7757(02)00499-5 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.clay.2009.08.00210.1016/j.clay.2009.08.002 ↗
49. Bruker. NMR Frequencies vs Bruker Field Strengths; Bruker, 2012.
50. 10.4416/JCST2014-0000710.4416/JCST2014-00007 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.12087010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.120870 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.oceram.2020.10003510.1016/j.oceram.2020.100035 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12096510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120965 ↗
54. 10.1021/jp014324110.1021/jp0143241 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2016.10.00410.1016/j.ssnmr.2016.10.004 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.02210.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.022 ↗
57. Freire, A. L. Application of Geopolymers in CO2 Adsorption at Low Temperature. Dissertation, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2019.
58. 10.22533/at.ed.47519061110.22533/at.ed.475190611 ↗
59. 10.1002/pi.546710.1002/pi.5467 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.10368710.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103687 ↗
61. 10.1002/cssc.20120057010.1002/cssc.201200570 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.08.00410.1016/j.cattod.2019.08.004 ↗
63. 10.1021/je100215c10.1021/je100215c ↗
64. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.10.02410.1016/j.micromeso.2018.10.024 ↗
65. 10.3390/su15151157410.3390/su151511574 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3036810.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30368 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jece.2024.11208110.1016/j.jece.2024.112081 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13359110.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133591 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11028210.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110282 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.11954010.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119540 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12717910.1016/j.fuel.2022.127179 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14457910.1016/j.cej.2023.144579 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.12.02710.1016/j.jiec.2023.12.027 ↗
74. 10.1007/s10450-021-00306-y10.1007/s10450-021-00306-y ↗