Enhanced Carrier Collection in Cd/In-Based Dual Buffers in Kesterite Thin-Film Solar Cells from Nanoparticle Inks
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Increasing the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of kesterite Cu 2 ZnSn(S,Se) 4 (CZTSSe) solar cells has remained challenging over the past decade, in part due to open-circuit voltage ( V OC )-limiting defect states at the absorber/buffer interface. Previously, we found that substituting the conventional CdS buffer layer with In 2 S 3 in CZTSSe devices fabricated from nanoparticle inks produced an increase in the apparent doping density of the CZTSSe film and a higher built-in voltage arising from a more favorable energy-band alignment at the absorber/buffer interface. However, any associated gain in V OC was negated by the introduction of photoactive defects at the interface. This present study incorporates a hybrid Cd/In dual buffer in CZTSSe devices that demonstrate an average relative increase of 11.5% in PCE compared to CZTSSe devices with a standard CdS buffer. Current density–voltage analysis using a double-diode model revealed the presence of (i) a large recombination current in the quasi-neutral region (QNR) of the CZTSSe absorber in the standard CdS-based device, (ii) a large recombination current in the space-charge region (SCR) of the hybrid buffer CZTSSe–In 2 S 3 –CdS device, and (iii) reduced recombination currents in both the QNR and SCR of the CZTSSe–CdS–In 2 S 3 device. This accounts for a notable 9.0% average increase in the short-circuit current density ( J SC ) observed in CZTSSe–CdS–In 2 S 3 in comparison to the CdS-only CZTSSe solar cells. Energy-dispersive X-ray, secondary-ion mass spectroscopy, and grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction compositional analysis of the CZTSSe layer in the three types of kesterite solar cells suggest that there is diffusion of elemental In and Cd into the absorbers with a hybrid buffer. Enhanced Cd diffusion concomitant with a double postdeposition heat treatment of the hybrid buffer layers in the CZTSSe–CdS–In 2 S 3 device increases carrier collection and extraction and boosts J SC . This is evidenced by electron-beam-induced current measurements, where higher current generation and collection near to the p–n junction is observed, accounting for the increase in J SC in this device. It is expected that optimization of the heat treatment of the hybrid buffer layers will lead to further improvements in the device performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mathematics, Physics and Electrical Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, United Kingdom
Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. http://www.shell.com/skyscenario.
2. 10.1038/s41560-018-0206-010.1038/s41560-018-0206-0 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41560-022-01078-710.1038/s41560-022-01078-7 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41560-023-01251-610.1038/s41560-023-01251-6 ↗
5. 10.1002/pip.372610.1002/pip.3726 ↗
6. NREL, Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html, 2023.
7. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.01610.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.016 ↗
8. 10.1002/pip.275610.1002/pip.2756 ↗
9. 10.1088/2053-1591/1/4/04504010.1088/2053-1591/1/4/045040 ↗
10. 10.1039/C7RA13336G10.1039/C7RA13336G ↗
11. 10.1038/s41560-017-0028-510.1038/s41560-017-0028-5 ↗
12. 10.1039/D0EE02004D10.1039/D0EE02004D ↗
13. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0173210.1021/acsaem.9b01732 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.01910.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.019 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0498410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04984 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.471473710.1063/1.4714737 ↗
17. 10.1063/5.000237210.1063/5.0002372 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20140237310.1002/adma.201402373 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0324710.1021/acsaem.1c03247 ↗
20. 10.1088/1361-6463/aac8d310.1088/1361-6463/aac8d3 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20130146510.1002/aenm.201301465 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.474027610.1063/1.4740276 ↗
23. 10.1021/cm401522310.1021/cm4015223 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.06510.1016/j.solener.2018.03.065 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20120314610.1002/adma.201203146 ↗
26. 10.1002/pip.116010.1002/pip.1160 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20120173210.1002/adfm.201201732 ↗
28. 10.1002/pip.319610.1002/pip.3196 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.8b0807610.1021/acsami.8b08076 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.06710.1016/j.solener.2018.03.067 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10854-019-01108-310.1007/s10854-019-01108-3 ↗
32. 10.1002/9783527636280.ch410.1002/9783527636280.ch4 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0319310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03193 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.08210.1016/j.solener.2017.03.082 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0015110.1021/acsphotonics.7b00151 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.12910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.129 ↗
37. 10.1088/1361-6463/aafe6010.1088/1361-6463/aafe60 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.35584210.1063/1.355842 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.482025010.1063/1.4820250 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.272176810.1063/1.2721768 ↗
41. Shklovskii B. I. · 198410.1007/978-3-662-02403-4 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.04.00210.1016/j.tsf.2004.04.002 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.mssp.2012.02.00410.1016/j.mssp.2012.02.004 ↗
44. 10.1038/srep3536910.1038/srep35369 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0052710.1021/acsaem.8b00527 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja205869210.1021/ja2058692 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.02.03110.1016/j.solmat.2012.02.031 ↗
48. 10.7567/JJAP.53.03580110.7567/JJAP.53.035801 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.02.00210.1016/j.solmat.2016.02.002 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.10610.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.106 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0015110.1021/acsenergylett.7b00151 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.497117910.1063/1.4971179 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.05310.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.053 ↗