journal article·2024-02-26

Remarkable SO2 and H2S Resistant Ability on CO Oxidation by Unique Pd/WO3 3D Hollow Sphere Nanocatalyst: Correlating Structure–Activity Relationships on SO2 Exposure

Vijayakrishnan Jeyavani, Deepali Kondhekar, Meema Bhati, Sahil Dev, Kavita Joshi, R. Nandini Devi, Shatabdi Porel Mukherjee

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 7· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

We report a simple inorganic route for synthesizing a Pd/WO 3 3D hollow sphere nanocatalyst, where Pd nanoparticles are encapsulated and well distributed on porous tungsten oxide nanospheres. The synthesis protocol has advantages, as it requires no surfactant or stabilizing agent, Pd loading is easily tuned, and the as-synthesized nanomaterials can be directly used as catalysts for the CO oxidation reaction. The synthesized nanocatalyst exhibited 100% CO to CO 2 conversion efficiency at 260 °C. In addition, the nanocatalyst demonstrated remarkable SO 2 (3 ppm) tolerance during the CO oxidation reaction for prolonged SO 2 sulfation of 1–21 h at 260–400 °C. This represents the longest SO 2 exposure time reported to date based on a single metal Pd/support-based nanocatalyst. No decrement in CO conversion efficiency was observed even after SO 2 (3 ppm) treatment for 21 h for the first time based on a single metal Pd-based nanocatalyst. Moreover, the synthesized nanocatalyst shows H 2 S (4 ppm), even in situ H 2 S tolerance during the CO oxidation reaction at 260 °C for 1–3 h and exhibited less sensitivity to prolonged and stringent sulfur exposure, with the highest H 2 S concentration and maximum 100% CO to CO 2 conversion efficiency obtained after H 2 S treatment for the first time based on a Pd-based nanocatalyst to the best of our knowledge. The composition and structure of the R-Pd/WO 3 nanocatalyst were not much influenced, even after the prolonged SO 2 and H 2 S exposure during the CO oxidation reaction, as verified from spent catalyst analysis. Finally, our DFT-based model provides insights into understanding the observed sulfur resistance on Pd/WO 3 by analyzing the underlying electronic structure. Therefore, our strategic synthesis methodology will open up many opportunities to select Pd/metal oxide-based nanomaterials for designing highly efficient, stable, and SO 2 /H 2 S-resistant nanocomposite catalyst.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Industrial Gas Emission Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physical and Materials Chemistry Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory (CSIR-NCL), Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411008, India

Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India

Catalysis and Inorganic Chemistry Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory (CSIR-NCL), Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411008, India

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India · University Grants Commission · National Chemical Laboratory

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1595/147106706X11145610.1595/147106706X111456 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.03510.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.035 ↗
3. 10.3390/catal501014510.3390/catal5010145 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11771-014-2402-910.1007/s11771-014-2402-9 ↗
5. 10.1021/ar980119110.1021/ar9801191 ↗
6. 10.1595/147106707X20585710.1595/147106707X205857 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)01011-210.1016/S0009-2614(98)01011-2 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.338010.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3380 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.10731710.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107317 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20110137810.1002/anie.201101378 ↗
11. 10.1039/C4CY00983E10.1039/C4CY00983E ↗
12. 10.1021/ie900882p10.1021/ie900882p ↗
13. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0181010.1021/acscatal.7b01810 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0562210.1021/acs.iecr.0c05622 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0535110.1021/acs.iecr.9b05351 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep1087610.1038/srep10876 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c0001610.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00016 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.47791010.1063/1.477910 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.04810.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.048 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0076721110.1007/BF00767211 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
25. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
26. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa66f310.1088/1361-648X/aa66f3 ↗
27. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
28. 10.1021/j100135a01410.1021/j100135a014 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp202489s10.1021/jp202489s ↗
30. 10.1002/jcc.2342410.1002/jcc.23424 ↗
31. 10.1002/jcc.2430010.1002/jcc.24300 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.100665210810.1073/pnas.1006652108 ↗
33. 10.1007/3-540-10655-3_210.1007/3-540-10655-3_2 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0271510.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02715 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.03410.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.034 ↗
36. 10.1002/anie.20060403210.1002/anie.200604032 ↗
37. 10.1166/jnn.2014.848810.1166/jnn.2014.8488 ↗
38. 10.1039/C6RA18899K10.1039/C6RA18899K ↗
39. 10.1002/cphc.20200065610.1002/cphc.202000656 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00604-021-04866-210.1007/s00604-021-04866-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.06510.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.065 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.susc.2017.08.00710.1016/j.susc.2017.08.007 ↗
43. 10.1134/S003602440706007610.1134/S0036024407060076 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10562-008-9651-x10.1007/s10562-008-9651-x ↗
45. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0233710.1021/acsnano.5b02337 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.11163310.1016/j.mcat.2021.111633 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11893410.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118934 ↗
48. 10.1039/C2CY00417H10.1039/C2CY00417H ↗
49. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12880210.1016/j.fuel.2023.128802 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0409810.1021/acs.iecr.2c04098 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.18910.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.189 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0087010.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00870 ↗
53. 10.1039/D1SE00584G10.1039/D1SE00584G ↗
54. 10.1021/am502807b10.1021/am502807b ↗