Analysis of Li-Ion Battery Gases Vented in an Inert Atmosphere Thermal Test Chamber
Source abstract
Abstract
One way to support the development of new safety practices in testing and field failure situations of electric vehicles and their lithium-ion (Li-ion) traction batteries is to conduct studies simulating plausible incident scenarios. This paper focuses on risks and hazards associated with venting of gaseous species formed by thermal decomposition reactions of the electrolyte and electrode materials during thermal runaway of the cell. A test set-up for qualitative and quantitative measurements of both major and minor gas species in the vented emissions from Li-ion batteries is described. The objective of the study is to measure gas emissions in the absence of flames, since gassing can occur without subsequent fire. Test results regarding gas emission rates, total gas emission volumes, and amounts of hydrogen fluoride (HF) and CO2 formed in inert atmosphere when heating lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and lithium nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) dioxide/lithium manganese oxide (LMO) spinel cell stacks are presented and discussed. Important test findings include the large difference in total gas emissions from NMC/LMO cells compared to LFP, 780 L kg−1 battery cells, and 42 L kg−1 battery cells, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the total amount of HF formed for both cell types, suggesting that LFP releases higher concentrations of HF than NMC/LMO cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Autoliv Sverige AB; SE-447 37 Vårgårda, Sweden
Research Institute of Sweden (RISE), Box 857, SE-501 15 Borås, Sweden
Volvo Car Corporation, SE-405 31 Gothenburg, Sweden
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Andersson, P., and Sundström, U. (2014). E-vehicle safe rescue. Investigation of risk factors and rescue tactics in a traffic incident event involving an e-vehicle. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Fire in Vehicles – FIVE 2014, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden.
2. Fire on e-vehicle battery cells and packs10.1080/15389588.2015.1015117 ↗
3. Brodd, R.J. (2013). Li-ion batteries, safety. Batteries for Sustainability. Selected Entries for the Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-5791-6 ↗
4. How electrolytes influence battery safety
5. Abuse response of 18650 Li-Ion cells with different cathodes using EC:EMC/LiPF6 and EC:PC:DMC/LiPF6 Electrolytes10.1149/1.2897969 ↗
6. Hollas, J.M. (1996). Modern Spectroskopy, John Whiley & Sons Ltd.. [3rd ed.].
7. Conformational and structural studies of 1-fluoropropane from temperature dependant FT-IR spectra of rare gas solutions and ab initio calculations10.1023/A:1022483207135 ↗
8. Thermal Stability of LiPF6-based Electrolyte and Effect of Contact with Various Delithiated Cathodes of Li-ion Batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.045 ↗
9. Lei, B., Zhao, W., Ziebert, C., Uhlmann, N., Rohde, M., and Seifert, H.J. (2017). Experimental analysis of thermal runaway in 18650 cylindrical Li-Ion cells using an accelerating rate calorimeter. Batteries, 3.10.20944/preprints201702.0033.v1 ↗
10. Transportation safety of lithium iron phosphate batteries—A feasibility study of storing at very low states of charge10.1038/s41598-017-05438-2 ↗
11. Fire behavior of carbonates-based electrolytes used in Li-ion rechargeable batteries with a focus on the role of the LiPF6 and LiFSI salts10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.065 ↗
12. Scenario-based prediction of Li-ion batteries fire-induced toxicity10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.090 ↗
13. Bergström, U., Gustafsson, Å., Hägglund, L., Lejon, C., Sturk, D., and Tengel, T. (2015). Vented Gases and Aerosol of Automotive Li-ion LFP and NMC Batteries in Humified Nitrogen Under Thermal Load, Försvarets Forskningsinstitut. Försvarets Forskningsinstitut FOI-R--4166—SE.
14. Garche, J., and Brandt, K. (2019). Analysis of gases emitted in safety events. Electrochemical Powers Sources: Fundamentals, Systems, and Applications. Li-Battery Safety, Elsevier.
15. Thermal stability of LiPF6 Salt and Li-ion battery electrolytes containing LiPF610.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.058 ↗
16. Decomposition reaction of LiPF6-based electrolytes for lithium ion cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.084 ↗
17. Initial stages of thermal decomposition of LiPF6-based lithium ion battery electrolytes by detailed Raman and NMR spectroscopy10.1039/c3ra42611d ↗
18. Lithium-ion batteries: Runaway risk of forming toxic compounds10.1038/424635b ↗
19. Toxicity, a serious concern of thermal runaway from commercial Li-ion battery10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.031 ↗
20. Sturk, D., Hägglund, L., Lejon, C., Tengel, T., and Gustafsson, Å. (2016, January 19–22). Analysis of emitted gases from Li-ion LFP and NMC batteries at elevated temperatures. Proceedings of the EVS29 Symposium, Montreal, QC, Canada.
21. Koch, S., Birke, K.P., and Kuhn, R. (2018). Fast thermal runaway detection for Lithium-ion cells in large scale traction batteries. Batteries, 4.10.3390/batteries4020016 ↗
22. An experimental evaluation of toxic gas emissions from vehicle fires10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.12.002 ↗
23. Toxic fluoride gas emissions from lithium-iion battery fires10.1038/s41598-017-09784-z ↗
24. Eriksson, T. Personal communication.
25. Using FTIR to determine toxic gases in fires with Li-ion batterie10.1002/fam.2359 ↗
26. Calculation of flame ionization detector relative response factors using the effective carbon number concept10.1093/chromsci/23.8.333 ↗