Promising Multicomponent Cubic Alloys for Hydrogen Storage: Insights from First-Principles Calculations and Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
An extensive exploration of the chemical space was conducted to design and identify promising multicomponent cubic alloys with appropriate enthalpy of reaction for hydrogen storage applications. We aim to identify alloys with suitable hydrogen absorption conditions for ambient conditions, according to favorable thermodynamic criteria, while addressing computational challenges in modeling large-scale systems. 18 elements were selected, leading to the systematic investigation of over 8000 quinary alloy systems across four distinct crystal phases (within solid–solution alloys, mono- and dihydrides). This effort resulted in a comprehensive data set of more than 34,000 equimolar M H x structures, where M represents a combination of 5 elements chosen among the 18 selected atoms. To handle the computational demands of density functional theory (DFT) calculations on such a large scale of disordered supercells designed by the special quasirandom structure (SQS) method, a machine learning (ML) approach was introduced to accurately predict the enthalpy of hydride formation. By training the ML model on a strategically chosen subset of the data, high predictive accuracy was achieved while significantly reducing computational costs. By applying filtering parameters constrained by thermodynamic considerations, such as the value of plateau pressure or the presence of a single plateau, the integrated DFT-SQS-ML framework successfully identified 568 quinary alloy systems as ideal candidates for hydrogen storage. The findings establish a solid foundation for experimental validation and further advancements in the field of hydrogen storage materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Univ Paris Est Creteil, CNRS, ICMPE, UMR 7182, 2 rue Henri Dunant, 94320 Thiais, France
CNRS-Saint-Gobain-NIMS, IRL 3629, Laboratory for Innovative Key Materials and Structures (LINK), 1-1 Namiki, 305-0044 Tsukuba, Japan
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.01410.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.02210.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.022 ↗
3. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.9110.1038/natrevmats.2016.91 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00339010077510.1007/s003390100775 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15354810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153548 ↗
6. 10.1021/jp204835z10.1021/jp204835z ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.05410.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.054 ↗
8. 10.1039/D1MA00101A10.1039/D1MA00101A ↗
9. 10.3389/fenrg.2022.99144710.3389/fenrg.2022.991447 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.08110.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081 ↗
11. 10.1039/D1EE01543E10.1039/D1EE01543E ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.11310.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.113 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.14610.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.146 ↗
14. 10.1038/nature1798110.1038/nature17981 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41586-018-0337-210.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
17. Liu Z.-K. · J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. · 2015 · 36 · 141
18. Ahmad M. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2021 · 125 · 6511
19. Zhang L. · Mater. Today · 2020 · 39 · 70
20. Park Y. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 18930
21. Kim H. · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 204 · 11650010.1016/j.actamat.2020.116500 ↗
22. Jha D. · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 1759310.1038/s41598-018-35934-y ↗
23. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/09301110.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093011 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0297110.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02971 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0064710.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00647 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2024.11984110.1016/j.actamat.2024.119841 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0966-9795(97)00088-510.1016/S0966-9795(97)00088-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2003.09.15310.1016/j.jallcom.2003.09.153 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11811710.1016/j.actamat.2022.118117 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15260610.1016/j.cej.2024.152606 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.12.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.12.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.18110.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.181 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.11577410.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115774 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.32710.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.327 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.00610.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.006 ↗
38. He T. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2013 · 2 · 21
39. 10.1088/1361-648X/aad25910.1088/1361-648X/aad259 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11086410.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110864 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.imavis.2018.04.00410.1016/j.imavis.2018.04.004 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.14530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10794010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107940 ↗
44. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
45. 10.1080/09506608.2016.118002010.1080/09506608.2016.1180020 ↗
46. Luo J. · Scr. Mater. · 2018 · 153 · 10410.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.04.049 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11669-021-00922-910.1007/s11669-021-00922-9 ↗
48. Johnson E. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 4876
49. Smith J. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2009 · 2 · 102310.1039/B814123A ↗
50. 10.3390/hydrogen302001610.3390/hydrogen3020016 ↗
51. Martinez C. · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 1555
52. Joubert J.-M. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2008 · 446 · 68
53. Fukai Y. · 200510.1007/3-540-28883-X ↗
54. Senkov O. · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2018 · 6 · 19910.1080/21663831.2018.1434248 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.01104110.1103/PhysRevX.5.011041 ↗
56. 10.3390/nano902024810.3390/nano9020248 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c0327010.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c03270 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.10810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.108 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.06710.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.067 ↗
60. 10.1021/cr030691s10.1021/cr030691s ↗
61. Yartys V. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2012 · 509 · S446
62. Mihaylov P. · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2015 · 40 · 8045
63. Ovren B. · J. Mater. Res. · 2015 · 30 · 1745
64. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.21210.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.212 ↗
65. Zhu Y. · Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. · 2017 · 27 · 110.1016/j.pnsc.2017.01.009 ↗
66. Feldmann D. · Mater. Today · 2021 · 44 · 23
67. You H. · 2020
68. 10.1063/1.358722810.1063/1.3587228 ↗
69. Bligaard T. · Surf. Sci. · 2004 · 590 · 65
70. Gupta A. · 2011