Production of TiFe Hydrogen-Storage Material by Direct Reduction of Ilmenite Mineral Sand
Source abstract
Abstract
The transition to a hydrogen-based economy necessitates the development of safe, cost-effective hydrogen storage media at an industrial scale. The equiatomic intermetallic titanium–iron (TiFe) alloy is a prime candidate for stationary hydrogen applications due to its high volumetric storage density, nontoxicity, and safety attributes. However, the conventional synthesis of TiFe alloy relies on high purity titanium and iron metal feedstocks, which must first be extracted from their respective ores before being alloyed in equiatomic ratio. This is a complex, multistep process posing environmental and economic challenges associated with the extraction of metallurgical-grade titanium. Here, we propose an alternate straightforward synthesis pathway for TiFe alloy through the direct calciothermic reduction of ilmenite sand (FeTiO 3 ). Initial small-scale experiments have achieved a maximum TiFe yield of approximately 52 wt %, with similar yields observed when scaling up to 100 g samples. The TiFe alloy produced via this pathway demonstrated a hydrogen storage capacity of approximately 0.71 wt % after activation at 65 bar, indicating that direct metallothermic reduction of ilmenite sand represents an attractive alternative production route for hydrogen storage alloys, which offers economic and sustainability advantages over the existing industrial pathway.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Robinson Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering
Victoria University of Wellington
The MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
Institute of Hydrogen Technology
Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon
Department of Chemistry
University of Otago
Callaghan Innovation
Faculty of Chemicals and Materials Engineering
University of Auckland
Funding
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment · Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung · German-New Zealand Green Hydrogen Centre
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.coche.2021.10070110.1016/j.coche.2021.100701 ↗
2. 10.3390/hydrogen204002410.3390/hydrogen2040024 ↗
3. 10.1039/C8EE01157E10.1039/C8EE01157E ↗
4. 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.10018010.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180 ↗
5. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office. Hydrogen Storage . https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-storage. (accessed 08 October 2024).
6. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.03.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.03.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.07.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.07.001 ↗
8. 10.3390/su13221265410.3390/su132212654 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10777210.1016/j.est.2023.107772 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.04910.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.049 ↗
11. 10.1039/D1MA00101A10.1039/D1MA00101A ↗
12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814853-2.00015-110.1016/B978-0-12-814853-2.00015-1 ↗
13. 10.3390/en1111314110.3390/en11113141 ↗
14. 10.1021/ic50131a04210.1021/ic50131a042 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15992510.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159925 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.29510.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.295 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.06310.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.063 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.13710.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.137 ↗
19. 10.1002/chem.20050069710.1002/chem.200500697 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.08910.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.089 ↗
21. Glazoff, M. V.; Marschman, S. C.; Soelberg, N. R. On a Thermodynamic Approach to Material Selection for Service in Aggressive Multi-Component Gaseous and/or Vapor Environments , INL/EXT-15–36724, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho National Lab.: Idaho Falls, ID, 2015. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1389183. (accessed 15 September 2024).10.2172/1389183 ↗
22. 10.1002/smtd.20180006210.1002/smtd.201800062 ↗
23. 10.3390/met1011149310.3390/met10111493 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.08.01010.1016/j.mineng.2007.08.010 ↗
25. 10.3390/met909096210.3390/met9090962 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1001-0521(07)60089-810.1016/S1001-0521(07)60089-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.09.03110.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.09.031 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.01910.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.019 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.15610.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.156 ↗
30. Bravard, J. C.; Portal, C. Energy expenditures associated with the production and recycle of metals , ORNL-MIT-132, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN. 1972. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7351678. (accessed 24 August 2024).
31. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.24010.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.240 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00170-020-06367-710.1007/s00170-020-06367-7 ↗
33. 10.1007/978-3-030-11274-5_510.1007/978-3-030-11274-5_5 ↗
34. Bowden, D. M.; Peter, W. H. Near-net shape fabrication using low-cost titanium alloy powders , osti_1040632; DE-EE0003480, The Boeing Company: St. Louis., MO, 2012. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1040632. (accessed 11 September 2024).
35. Rankin W. J. · 201110.1071/9780643097278 ↗
36. 10.1007/BF0322321210.1007/BF03223212 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0322314310.1007/BF03223143 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.01010.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.010 ↗
39. CEEC International. Mining Energy Consumption 2021: A high-level study into mining energy use for the key mineral commodities of the future . The Weir Group PLC, 2021. https://www.ceecthefuture.org/resources/mining-energy-consumption-2021. (accessed 08 August 2024).
40. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.00710.1016/j.rser.2016.12.007 ↗
41. 10.3390/en1104094810.3390/en11040948 ↗
42. World Steel Association. World Steel in Figures 2024 . worldsteel.org. (accessed 09 July 2024).
43. Jamison, K.; Kramer, C.; Brueske, S.; Fisher, A. Bandwidth Study on Energy Use and Potential Energy Saving Opportunities in US Iron and Steel Manufacturing , DOE/EE-1231; 7392, Energetics Inc.: Columbia, MD, 2017. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1248755. (accessed 13 August 2024).
44. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.06.01810.1016/j.jclepro.2006.06.018 ↗
45. Fruehan, R.; Fortini, O.; Paxton, H.; Brindle, R. Theoretical minimum energies to produce steel for selected conditions , Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA, 2000. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/769470. (accessed 03 August 2024).10.2172/769470 ↗
46. Metso, LLC. Metso Release 2023: HSC Chemistry 7.1.1 , Metso, LLC.: Finland, 2023. https://www.metso.com/portfolio/hsc-chemistry/. (accessed 08 September 2024).
47. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50025-410.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50025-4 ↗
48. 10.1371/journal.pone.010129810.1371/journal.pone.0101298 ↗
49. 10.1016/B978-0-323-85373-6.00010-710.1016/B978-0-323-85373-6.00010-7 ↗
50. Infomine Market Research Group. Calcium Metal: Production, Market and Forecast in Russia and in the World , Infomine, 2023. https://infomine.ru/files/catalog/380/file_380_eng.pdf. (accessed 17 September 2024).
51. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce. NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69 . https://webbook.nist.gov/. (accessed 2024 August 28).
52. 10.1016/0016-7037(85)90061-410.1016/0016-7037(85)90061-4 ↗
53. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. US national weighted average CO 2 marginal emission rate . https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references. (accessed 21 09 2024).
54. 10.1038/s43246-022-00324-510.1038/s43246-022-00324-5 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.10610.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.106 ↗
56. 10.1007/BF0082025710.1007/BF00820257 ↗
57. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.746.1410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.746.14 ↗