journal article·2019-01-28

Compact Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes with Lightweight Reduced Graphene Oxide/Poly(Acrylic Acid) Current Collectors

Joshua P. Pender, Han Xiao, Ziyue Dong, Kelsey A. Cavallaro, Jason A. Weeks, Adam Heller, Christopher J. Ellison, C. Buddie Mullins

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 2· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

We report the fabrication and electrochemical performance of metal-foil free Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) and LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 (NCM) electrodes supported on conductive and porous reduced graphene oxide/poly(acrylic acid) (rGO-PAA) aerogels. The highly porous rGO-PAA (∼6 mg cm–3) enables slurry infiltration of LTO and NCM to form composite electrodes with tunable mass loadings (∼3–30 mg cm–2), and the resultant composites can withstand 100-fold compression (from 3.2 mm to ∼30–130 μm) to achieve electrode densities of 2–3 g cm–3. The adequate compressibility of the rGO-PAA coupled with removal of the conventional metal-foil weight and volume provides high volumetric energy densities of 1723 Wh L–1 for NCM and 625 Wh L–1 for LTO at low power density, representing a 25% increase in energy density over similar electrodes built with metal-foil current collectors. These metrics demonstrate the utility of the rGO-PAA current collector to reduce the weight and volume of lithium-ion electrodes without sacrificing energy density.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Funding

Welch Foundation · Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja309143810.1021/ja3091438 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.0251701jes10.1149/2.0251701jes ↗
3. 10.1149/2.0321602jes10.1149/2.0321602jes ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019 ↗
5. 10.1149/2.0401507jes10.1149/2.0401507jes ↗
6. 10.1007/s10800-017-1047-410.1007/s10800-017-1047-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.16110.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.161 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5TA00361J10.1039/C5TA00361J ↗
9. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1310.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20170298910.1002/smll.201702989 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.115183110.1126/science.1151831 ↗
12. 10.1039/c4ee00318g10.1039/c4ee00318g ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.016 ↗
14. 10.1039/C6RA07413H10.1039/C6RA07413H ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.07110.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.071 ↗
16. 10.1039/C8TA05706K10.1039/C8TA05706K ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20170089810.1002/adma.201700898 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20150529910.1002/adma.201505299 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.7b0728310.1021/acsami.7b07283 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.03210.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.032 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0074310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00743 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.aam585210.1126/science.aam5852 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.6b1562810.1021/acsami.6b15628 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.04210.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.042 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.04310.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.043 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.02410.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.024 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20170059510.1002/aenm.201700595 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.5b1064810.1021/acsami.5b10648 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20110026110.1002/aenm.201100261 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.08810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.088 ↗
31. 10.1039/C7CS00139H10.1039/C7CS00139H ↗
32. 10.1039/C8NR02924E10.1039/C8NR02924E ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.5b0040710.1021/acsami.5b00407 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00529-910.1016/S0378-7753(03)00529-9 ↗
35. 10.1038/nmat343510.1038/nmat3435 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20160162510.1002/aenm.201601625 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.475699510.1063/1.4756995 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20140327310.1002/adfm.201403273 ↗