journal article·2023-01-23

Split Biphasic Electrochemical Cells: Toward Membrane-Less Redox Flow Batteries

Arunavo Chakraborty, Richard Bock, Roger Green, Kyle Luker, Gabriel Ménard, Lior Sepunaru

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 6· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Ion-selective membranes are an essential, yet expensive fixture in redox flow batteries, preventing charge carrier crossover between the two half-cells. This work demonstrates the viability of replacing these membranes with an electrolyte solution that is mutually immiscible with the two half-cell solutions, eliminating the direct anolyte–catholyte interface that leads to self-discharge in existing biphasic cells. We developed a simple dichloromethane (DCM)/water model system consisting of charge carriers in the organic phase connected by an immiscible aqueous electrolyte sharing a common anion (PF6–) with the DCM phase. This “split biphasic” model cell maintained high Coulombic efficiencies (>99%) and capacity retention (∼95%) over a period of 24 h for fully charged cells. Lastly, we demonstrated the performance of this model system at scale in high-surface-area cells while retaining rapid charge–discharge at a rate of 1C.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, California93106, United States

Funding

University of California, Santa Barbara

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1574610.1038/nature15746 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20120069410.1002/adfm.201200694 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0133210.1021/acsenergylett.9b01332 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.00510.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.06710.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.067 ↗
6. 10.1039/C6EE02782B10.1039/C6EE02782B ↗
7. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10134810.1016/j.isci.2020.101348 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0001910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00019 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.02110.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.021 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aab303310.1126/science.aab3033 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.03.02110.1016/j.chempr.2020.03.021 ↗
12. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.10210.1038/nenergy.2016.102 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-021-00879-610.1038/s41560-021-00879-6 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0267610.1021/acsenergylett.9b02676 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23100110.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231001 ↗
16. 10.1002/aenm.20210347810.1002/aenm.202103478 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.08710.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.087 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.02810.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.028 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-018-06209-x10.1038/s41467-018-06209-x ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22868910.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228689 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.06610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.066 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja020812q10.1021/ja020812q ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.11.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.11.052 ↗
24. 10.1038/ncomms334610.1038/ncomms3346 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.01.01310.1016/j.coelec.2020.01.013 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20170431810.1002/anie.201704318 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.06310.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.063 ↗
28. 10.1002/advs.20180057610.1002/advs.201800576 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.1241712jes10.1149/2.1241712jes ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.8b1158110.1021/acsami.8b11581 ↗
31. 10.1039/C8CC06048G10.1039/C8CC06048G ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.11.01110.1016/j.ensm.2019.11.011 ↗
33. 10.1039/C6CC04325A10.1039/C6CC04325A ↗
34. Bowen T. · 201910.2172/1561843 ↗
35. 10.1021/jm021003k10.1021/jm021003k ↗
36. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c0006110.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00061 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.02.02410.1016/j.cplett.2009.02.024 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.fluid.2008.11.00410.1016/j.fluid.2008.11.004 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0059910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00599 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0013-4686(97)10151-710.1016/S0013-4686(97)10151-7 ↗