journal article·2023-07-10Open access

A Joint DFT-kMC Study To Model Ethylene Carbonate Decomposition Reactions: SEI Formation, Growth, and Capacity Loss during Calendar Aging of Li-Metal Batteries

Mohammed Bin Jassar, Carine Michel, Sara Abada, Theodorus De Bruin, Sylvain Tant, Carlos Nieto-Draghi, Stephan N. Steinmann

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 6· Issue 13

Abstract

The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is a multistructured thin layer that forms at the anode (e.g., lithium-metal)/electrolyte (e.g., ethylene carbonate EC) interface due to electrolyte reduction. At the initial battery cycles, the SEI protects the electrolyte from further reduction. However, the SEI continues to grow with time, leading to capacity loss and eventually the death of the battery. In this work, we modeled the battery-aging process at storage conditions (calendar aging). We studied EC decomposition reactions using density functional theory (DFT) simulations in the gas-phase in isolation and over the inorganic layer found inside the SEI composed of Li 2 CO 3 . We used the values obtained from DFT alongside diffusion coefficients from the literature to explore the temporal evolution of the concentration of the species by kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) simulations. We found that reactions occurring over Li 2 CO 3 (001) led to a relatively slow SEI growth which is compatible with the general use of carbonate-based solvents in LIBs for protection/passivation purposes. Our simulations over Li 2 CO 3 (001) predict the formation of a multilayered structured SEI. Moreover, our kMC simulations predict the shift from a nonlinear initial behavior to a linear behavior for the capacity loss induced by the formation and growth of the SEI over time which was reported in previous experimental and theoretical studies for lithiated graphite-based batteries. We extended our analysis to the decomposition reactions over the Li 2 O (111) surface, which could form from the decomposition of Li 2 CO 3 . We found that the selectivity of the decomposition reactions strongly depends on the inorganic surface. The main conclusion of this study is to highlight the crucial role played by surface reactions inside the SEI on the nature and selectivity of the decomposition kinetics of EC for the SEI growth.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Stellantis - Centre Technique de Carrière-sous-Poissy, 212 Boulevard Pelletier78955 Carrière-sous-Poissy, France

ENS de Lyon, CNRS, Laboratoire de Chimie UMR 5182, 69364 Lyon, France

IFP Energies nouvelles, 1 et 4 venue de Bois-Préau, 92852 Rueil-Malmaison, France

IFP Energies nouvelles, Rond-Point de l’échangeur de Solaize, BP 3, 69360 Solaize, France

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. Philippe, B. Insights in Li-ion Battery Interfaces through Photoelectron Spectroscopy Depth Profiling. Doctoral Thesis, Uppsala University; Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology; Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2013.
2. 10.1039/c3ra23502e10.1039/c3ra23502e ↗
3. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10350610.1016/j.est.2021.103506 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.05.02310.1016/j.coelec.2018.05.023 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.est.2018.04.02910.1016/j.est.2018.04.029 ↗
6. 10.1039/D1CP00359C10.1039/D1CP00359C ↗
7. 10.1038/s41524-018-0064-010.1038/s41524-018-0064-0 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0023910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00239 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14426610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144266 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.186199410.1149/1.1861994 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0440810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04408 ↗
12. 10.1021/la400764r10.1021/la400764r ↗
13. 10.1021/ja016452910.1021/ja0164529 ↗
14. 10.1039/D0MA00847H10.1039/D0MA00847H ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c0092110.1021/acs.jctc.1c00921 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.0c1878310.1021/acsami.0c18783 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0051710.1021/acsenergylett.2c00517 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.9b0758710.1021/acsami.9b07587 ↗
19. 10.1002/cphc.20200017410.1002/cphc.202000174 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10623710.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106237 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b0017010.1021/acs.jctc.5b00170 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.1c2048710.1021/acsami.1c20487 ↗
23. 10.1002/cssc.20180007710.1002/cssc.201800077 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.09410.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.094 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.180481210.1149/1.1804812 ↗
26. 10.1002/cssc.20200086710.1002/cssc.202000867 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0161506jes10.1149/2.0161506jes ↗
28. 10.1149/2.1271915jes10.1149/2.1271915jes ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0231904jes10.1149/2.0231904jes ↗
30. 10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.13364-510.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.13364-5 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.01110.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.011 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0273210.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02732 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20200125710.1002/aenm.202001257 ↗
34. 10.1149/2.0121711jes10.1149/2.0121711jes ↗
35. 10.1021/ja305366r10.1021/ja305366r ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.01110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.011 ↗
37. 10.1149/1945-7111/abdde110.1149/1945-7111/abdde1 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0043610.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00436 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22856710.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228567 ↗
40. 10.1021/je300308910.1021/je3003089 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
43. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1311510.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
46. 10.1021/ct200602x10.1021/ct200602x ↗
47. 10.1063/1.354598510.1063/1.3545985 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
49. Fleurat-Lessard, P. Reaction path. http://pfleurat.free.fr/ReactionPath.php (accessed Apr 4, 2023).
50. 10.1063/1.132967210.1063/1.1329672 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.48009710.1063/1.480097 ↗
52. 10.1016/0021-9991(75)90060-110.1016/0021-9991(75)90060-1 ↗
53. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5295-8_110.1007/978-1-4020-5295-8_1 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cma.2008.03.01010.1016/j.cma.2008.03.010 ↗
55. Plimpton, S.; Battaile, C.; Chandross, M.; Holm, L.; Thompson, A.; Tikare, V.; Wagner, G.; Webb, E.; Zhou, X.; Cardona, C. G.; Slepov. SPPARKS: Crossing the mesoscale no-mans land via parallel kinetic Monte Carlo. Technical Report for Sandia National Laboratories; OSTI, 2009; https://www.osti.gov/biblio/966942 (accessed May 18, 2023).
56. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.05010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.050 ↗
57. 10.1021/jp310591u10.1021/jp310591u ↗
58. 10.1021/jp108656910.1021/jp1086569 ↗
59. 10.1021/jp210345b10.1021/jp210345b ↗
60. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00505-510.1016/S0378-7753(01)00505-5 ↗
61. 10.1002/adma.20210040410.1002/adma.202100404 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41467-022-32557-w10.1038/s41467-022-32557-w ↗
63. 10.1149/2.0521509jes10.1149/2.0521509jes ↗
64. 10.1016/j.est.2018.01.01910.1016/j.est.2018.01.019 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.06710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.067 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.09810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.098 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.045 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.01210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.012 ↗