journal article·2024-02-26Open access

Comparing Ammonium and Tetraaminophosphonium Anion-Exchange Membranes Derived from Vinyl-Addition Polynorbornene Copolymers

Jamie C. Gaitor, Ami C. Yang-Neyerlin, Danielle Markovich, Brett P. Fors, Geoffrey W. Coates, Lena F. Kourkoutis, Bryan S. Pivovar, Tomasz Kowalewski, Kevin J. T. Noonan

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 7· Issue 4

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Herein, we systematically examined how composition influenced the properties of vinyl addition polynorbornene anion exchange membranes (AEMs) prepared from 5 -n -hexyl-2-norbornene and 5-(4-bromobutyl)-2-norbornene. Copolymerization kinetics revealed that 5 -n -hexyl-2-norbornene is consumed faster than 5-(4-bromobutyl)-2-norbornene, leading to a portion of the chain being richer in bromoalkyl groups. The alkyl halide pendants can then be converted to either trimethylammonium or tetrakis(dialkylamino)phosphonium cations through straightforward substitution with trimethylamine or a tris(dialkylamino)phosphazene. A series of cationic ammonium polymers were synthesized first, where conductivity and water uptake increased as a function of increasing ionic content in the polymer. The optimized copolymer had a hydroxide conductivity of 95 ± 6 mS/cm at 80 °C. The living polymerization of the two monomers catalyzed by a cationic tert -butylphosphine palladium catalyst also enabled precise changes in the molecular weight while keeping the functional group concentration constant. Molecular weight did not have a significant impact on hydroxide conductivity over the range of ∼60–190 kg/mol ( M n ). The optimized tetraaminophosphonium AEM had the highest conductivity for any tetraaminophosphonium polymer to date (70 ± 3 mS/cm at 80 °C). Clear phase separation and larger domains were observed for the phosphonium-based AEM compared to the ammonium at an identical composition, which is attributed to the larger occupied volume of the phosphorus cation. Fuel cell studies with the two membranes resulted in peak power densities of 1.59 and 0.79 W/cm 2 for the ammonium and tetraaminophosphonium membrane electrode assemblies, respectively. The ammonium-based membrane was more water permeable as evidenced by water limiting current studies, which likely contributed to the improved performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, 4400 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States

Chemistry and Nanoscience Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States

Funding

Energy Frontier Research Centers

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0033110.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00331 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0038710.1021/acsaem.8b00387 ↗
3. 10.1039/C4EE01303D10.1039/C4EE01303D ↗
4. 10.1039/c3cs60053j10.1039/c3cs60053j ↗
5. 10.1039/D1PY00278C10.1039/D1PY00278C ↗
6. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.003 ↗
7. 10.1070/RC2011v080n04ABEH00420310.1070/RC2011v080n04ABEH004203 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.01010.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.010 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.1301910jes10.1149/2.1301910jes ↗
10. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0368210.1021/acsaem.2c03682 ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20220348810.1002/aenm.202203488 ↗
12. 10.1149/1945-7111/abcde310.1149/1945-7111/abcde3 ↗
13. 10.1149/1945-7111/abde7b10.1149/1945-7111/abde7b ↗
14. 10.1039/D3EE01293J10.1039/D3EE01293J ↗
15. Bell, A.; Elce, E.; Seto, K. Norbornene-Type Polymers Having Quaternary Ammonium Functionality. US Patent, 8765893, 2014.
16. 10.1039/D0TA04756B10.1039/D0TA04756B ↗
17. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0205110.1021/acsaem.8b02051 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.04110.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.041 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0209410.1021/acsaem.1c02094 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20230477810.1002/anie.202304778 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.12191610.1016/j.memsci.2023.121916 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b0007910.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00079 ↗
23. 10.1021/om060347w10.1021/om060347w ↗
24. 10.1021/ma020928710.1021/ma0209287 ↗
25. 10.1021/om010232m10.1021/om010232m ↗
26. 10.1021/ma00042a03010.1021/ma00042a030 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0029710.1021/acsapm.2c00297 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0042210.1021/acs.macromol.0c00422 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja307466s10.1021/ja307466s ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.04710.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.047 ↗
31. 10.1021/ma101137z10.1021/ma101137z ↗
32. 10.1002/macp.20180005910.1002/macp.201800059 ↗
33. 10.1021/om049943l10.1021/om049943l ↗
34. 10.3390/polym1522444410.3390/polym15224444 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b0043510.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00435 ↗
36. 10.1002/macp.20050022810.1002/macp.200500228 ↗
37. 10.1063/5.004584110.1063/5.0045841 ↗
38. Roe R. J. · 2000
39. 10.1093/micmic/ozad067.65210.1093/micmic/ozad067.652 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.joc.0c0205110.1021/acs.joc.0c02051 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b0066310.1021/acs.organomet.7b00663 ↗
42. 10.1002/chem.20050083710.1002/chem.200500837 ↗
43. 10.1149/08008.0957ecst10.1149/08008.0957ecst ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23153410.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231534 ↗
45. 10.1149/1945-7111/abf77f10.1149/1945-7111/abf77f ↗
46. 10.1149/MA2021-02361055mtgabs10.1149/MA2021-02361055mtgabs ↗
47. 10.1039/D0TA05807F10.1039/D0TA05807F ↗
48. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.11.01010.1016/j.coelec.2018.11.010 ↗
49. 10.1039/C8EE00122G10.1039/C8EE00122G ↗
50. 10.1039/C8PY01618F10.1039/C8PY01618F ↗