journal article·2023-05-08

In Situ Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy Investigation of Fluoroethylene Carbonate and Lithium Difluorophosphate Dual Additives in SEI Formation over Cu Anode

Bikila Nagasa Olana, Leyela Hassen Adem, Shawn D. Lin, Bing-Joe Hwang, Yi-Chen Hsieh, Gunther Brunklaus, Martin Winter

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 6· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

The synergetic effect of fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and lithium difluorophosphate (LiPO 2 F 2 ) dual additives on the cycling stability of lithium metal batteries has been previously reported. This study applies in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) to examine the impact of these two additives on SEI species formation over Cu anode using a base electrolyte of LiPF 6 in ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC). The results indicate that all electrolyte components and additives can be electrochemically reduced over the Cu anode following a potential sequence of LiPO 2 F 2 > FEC > EC > DEC. The results illustrate that LiPF 6 likely interacts with the Cu anode upon contact, resulting in Li x PF y, which can lead to a reduction peak at ∼1.44 V in CV. With the base electrolyte, reduced species from Li x PF y lead to the formation of alkyl phosphorus fluorides (RPF), which can be suppressed by the presence of FEC and/or LiPO 2 F 2 . Similar to previous reports, FEC reduction in the 1st lithiation cycle leads to the continuous formation of poly(FEC), while EC is electrochemically reduced to (CH 2 OCO 2 Li) 2 and Li 2 CO 3 and DEC is reduced to CH 3 CH 2 OCO 2 Li and Li 2 CO 3 . With only the LiPO 2 F 2 additive, the redox of LiPO 2 F 2 can be found in CV with Li x PO y as the possible reduced product. In addition, Li 2 CO 3 formation from EC and DEC reduction was relatively suppressed by the presence of LiPO 2 F 2 . The simultaneous presence of the FEC additive can suppress the redox of LiPO 2 F 2 and partly the decomposition of LiPF 6 likely via the preferential adsorption of FEC on Cu. Similar DRIFTS observations are found over the Li anode. The electrolyte with dual additives demonstrates a possible advantage from poly(FEC) and Li x PO y species formation, suppressing the reduction of Li x PF y, EC, and DEC though not completely.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan

Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Münster, IEK-12, Münster 48149, Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung · Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0977110.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09771 ↗
2. 10.1039/d1qm00096a10.1039/d1qm00096a ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.02410.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.024 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.11.03410.1016/j.jechem.2020.11.034 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20160236710.1002/aenm.201602367 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20160235310.1002/adfm.201602353 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-021-21683-610.1038/s41467-021-21683-6 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.0731908jes10.1149/2.0731908jes ↗
10. 10.1039/c7nr09058g10.1039/c7nr09058g ↗
11. 10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
12. 10.1039/d0ee00518e10.1039/d0ee00518e ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0172710.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01727 ↗
14. 10.1021/cr500003w10.1021/cr500003w ↗
15. 10.1149/1.212885910.1149/1.2128859 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41524-018-0064-010.1038/s41524-018-0064-0 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10551610.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105516 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.00310.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.003 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja205119g10.1021/ja205119g ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-020-19246-210.1038/s41467-020-19246-2 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0011510.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 ↗
22. 10.1039/c9cc06504k10.1039/c9cc06504k ↗
23. 10.1149/2.0681714jes10.1149/2.0681714jes ↗
24. 10.1149/2.0071913jes10.1149/2.0071913jes ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.10310.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.103 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.03010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.030 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.03710.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.037 ↗
28. 10.1039/c7ra03926c10.1039/c7ra03926c ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.8b0518510.1021/acsami.8b05185 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.14610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.146 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0387710.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03877 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.00610.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.006 ↗
33. 10.1149/1.139361910.1149/1.1393619 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.010 ↗
35. 10.1039/c8cc10158b10.1039/c8cc10158b ↗
36. Elkhattabi E. · J. Mater. Environ. Sci. · 2016 · 7 · 790
37. 10.1016/s0013-4686(00)00332-710.1016/s0013-4686(00)00332-7 ↗
38. 10.1149/05336.0023ecst10.1149/05336.0023ecst ↗
39. 10.1149/2.0901802jes10.1149/2.0901802jes ↗
40. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0030010.1021/acsenergylett.7b00300 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0070510.1021/acsaem.8b00705 ↗