Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Gas Diffusion Electrodes: Enhanced Selectivity of In–Bi Bimetallic Particles and Catalyst Layer Optimization through a Design of Experiment Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
CO2 electroreduction to formate powered by renewable energy is an attractive strategy to recycle carbon. Electrode materials showing high selectivity for formate at high current densities are post-transition metals such as Sn, In, Pb, Hg, and Bi. Scaling up the CO2 electroreduction technology to industrial size will require, among other things, maximization of selectivity at high current densities. We show here that InBi electrocatalysts provide enhanced selectivity compared to pure In and Bi and that a proper formulation of the catalyst layer can have a profound impact on the performance of gas diffusion electrode electrolyzers. The best performing electrodes screened in this study show nearly 100% current efficiency at current densities up to 400 mA cm–2 for 2 h. Additionally, one electrode was shown to operate at a current density of 200 mA cm–2 for 48 h at a current efficiency of 85% and remained operating with a current efficiency above 50% for 124 h.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Avantium Chemicals BV, Zekeringstraat 29 1014 BV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Inorganic Materials and Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Van’t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Funding
European Commission
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aad499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
2. 10.1002/celc.20130020610.1002/celc.201300206 ↗
3. 10.1002/cssc.20200272510.1002/cssc.202002725 ↗
4. 10.1007/bf0191162710.1007/bf01911627 ↗
5. 10.1021/ja02245a00410.1021/ja02245a004 ↗
6. 10.2533/chimia.2015.76910.2533/chimia.2015.769 ↗
7. 10.1002/cssc.20080001510.1002/cssc.200800015 ↗
8. 10.1039/c5gc01893e10.1039/c5gc01893e ↗
9. 10.1002/cssc.20160039410.1002/cssc.201600394 ↗
10. Hori Y. · 2008 · 8910.1007/978-0-387-49489-0_3 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0203510.1021/acsenergylett.8b02035 ↗
12. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0521510.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05215 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10800-014-0731-x10.1007/s10800-014-0731-x ↗
14. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0019910.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00199 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20200831610.1002/anie.202008316 ↗
16. Parajuli, R.; Ansovini, D.; Philips, M. F.; Schouten, K. J. P. Catalyst system for catalyzed electrochemical reactions and preparation thereof, applications and uses thereof. WO 2019141827 A1.
17. Thompson, J. Design and Analysis in Chemical Research; Tranter, R. L., Ed. CRC Press, 2000; pp 85–110.
18. Philips, M. F.; Ansovini, D.; Figueiredo, M. C. C.; Krasovic, J. Method for the Preparation of a Gas Diffusion Layer and a Gas Diffusion Layer Obtained or Obtainable by Such Method. WO 2020165074 A1, 2020.
19. SAS Institute Inc. JMP 14 Design of Experiments Guide, 2018; pp 241–294.
20. Ansovini, D.; Philips, M. F.; Krasovic, J.; Figueiredo, M. C. C.; Schouten, K. J. Formation of Formic Acid with the Help of Indium-Containing Catalytic Electrode. WO 2021122323 A1, 2021.
21. Claeskens G. · 2006
22. Klimberg R. · 2013
23. 10.31399/asm.hb.v03.a000615010.31399/asm.hb.v03.a0006150 ↗
24. 10.1016/0040-6090(86)90422-010.1016/0040-6090(86)90422-0 ↗
25. SAS Institute Inc. JMP 14 Fitting Linear Models, 2018.
26. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0187910.1021/acscatal.6b01879 ↗
27. 10.1021/la501245p10.1021/la501245p ↗
28. 10.4149/km_2015_3_13310.4149/km_2015_3_133 ↗
29. 10.1016/s0022-0728(84)80139-410.1016/s0022-0728(84)80139-4 ↗