journal article·2021-09-27

Aerosol Jet-Printed LFP Cathodes with Bimodal Pore Distribution Improve the Rate Capability of LIB Cells

Rodrigo Rodriguez, L. Jay Deiner, Bang Hung Tsao, Joseph P. Fellner

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

The electrochemical performance of an aerosol jet (AJ)-printed lithium iron phosphate cathode versus an equivalent tape-cast (TC) cathode was evaluated. Rate capability and long-term cell testing demonstrated that at similar mass loadings and thicknesses, the AJ-printed cathodes achieved higher discharge capacities than the TC cathodes. Electron microscopy and X-ray tomography showed a bimodal pore network for the AJ-printed cathode; larger Li-ion-conducting channels were visible at the electrode surface, while a denser cathode structure (akin to a TC cathode) was present near the current collector. Electrochemical impedance calculations revealed that this bimodal pore distribution endowed AJ-printed cathodes with approximately 30% more electrochemically active surface area than their TC cathode counterparts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Air Force Research Laboratory, 1950 5th Street, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States

Department of Chemistry, NYC College of Technology, CUNY, Brooklyn, New York 11201, United States

University of Dayton Research Institute (UDRI), Dayton, Ohio 45469, United States

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory · National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · University of Dayton Research Institute

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aenm.20190145710.1002/aenm.201901457 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.7b0728310.1021/acsami.7b07283 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.351507210.1149/1.3515072 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20170059510.1002/aenm.201700595 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0200710.1021/acsaem.8b02007 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20120405510.1002/adma.201204055 ↗
7. 10.1149/2.0301603jes10.1149/2.0301603jes ↗
8. 10.1002/adem.20180128110.1002/adem.201801281 ↗
9. 10.1063/5.001645610.1063/5.0016456 ↗
10. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.9910.1038/nenergy.2016.99 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.10.01210.1016/j.jiec.2018.10.012 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22847510.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228475 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20190358810.1002/adfm.201903588 ↗
14. 10.1039/d0ta04460a10.1039/d0ta04460a ↗
15. 10.1039/c8ta11860d10.1039/c8ta11860d ↗
16. Lyu Z. · Joule · 2020 · 5 · 8910.1016/j.joule.2020.11.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.01010.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.010 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.09410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.094 ↗
19. 10.1088/2058-8585/aace2810.1088/2058-8585/aace28 ↗
20. 10.1088/2058-8585/aadffd10.1088/2058-8585/aadffd ↗
21. 10.1155/2012/32438010.1155/2012/324380 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00170-019-03438-210.1007/s00170-019-03438-2 ↗
23. 10.1002/adem.20190095210.1002/adem.201900952 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13810510.1016/j.electacta.2021.138105 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0382410.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03824 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12264110.1016/j.cej.2019.122641 ↗
27. 10.1017/s002211208800230710.1017/s0022112088002307 ↗
28. 10.1002/aic.1178310.1002/aic.11783 ↗
29. 10.1039/c7ta00371d10.1039/c7ta00371d ↗
30. 10.1021/nl300528p10.1021/nl300528p ↗
31. 10.1149/1.212966810.1149/1.2129668 ↗