journal article·2022-08-22

Metal–Support Interaction Can Deactivate IrOx/Sb:SnO2 OER Catalysts in Polyol Process

Hansaem Jang, Jeong-Hyeon Lee, Jeon Ryang Lee, Tae-Won Kim

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 5· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Only a few materials can remain undissolved under working conditions for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in acidic media, which limits the choice of catalysts and supports. One of the practical catalyst/support candidates is IrOx/Sb:SnO2 (Ir/ATO) because both components are thermodynamically stable under low-pH anodic conditions. Moreover, between Ir and ATO, a strong metal–support interaction is present, thereby allowing for long-lasting OER activity unless the support degrades. However, we demonstrate that the strong interaction can paradoxically deactivate Ir/ATO structures when synthesizing them using the polyol process. We reveal that the strong interaction in the presence of polyol at elevated temperatures can cause the reduction of the Sb dopant to zero-valency. Findings show that the varied oxidation state of the dopant decreases the electrical conductivity of the Ir/ATO, impeding the electron transfer through the support, hence deteriorating electrocatalytic activity toward the OER.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Green Energy & Nano Technology R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), Gwangju 61012, South Korea

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0162510.1021/acsenergylett.0c01625 ↗
2. 10.1039/C7SC01239J10.1039/C7SC01239J ↗
3. 10.1371/journal.pone.010794210.1371/journal.pone.0107942 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13727610.1016/j.electacta.2020.137276 ↗
5. Pourbaix M. · 1974
6. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.00210.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.002 ↗
8. 10.1021/jz501061n10.1021/jz501061n ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.10.02610.1016/j.jechem.2019.10.026 ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20200047810.1002/aenm.202000478 ↗
11. 10.1039/C9CS00607A10.1039/C9CS00607A ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20210846510.1002/adfm.202108465 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20200424310.1002/adma.202004243 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.01.01810.1016/j.hydromet.2019.01.018 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00338-810.1016/S0013-4686(00)00338-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.12910.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.129 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0921810jes10.1149/2.0921810jes ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.6b0719910.1021/jacs.6b07199 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20190667010.1002/adfm.201906670 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.07810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.078 ↗
21. 10.1002/cssc.20160181710.1002/cssc.201601817 ↗
22. 10.1039/D0CY00470G10.1039/D0CY00470G ↗
23. 10.1039/C5SC00518C10.1039/C5SC00518C ↗
24. 10.1039/C8SE00619A10.1039/C8SE00619A ↗
25. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0223010.1021/acsanm.9b02230 ↗
26. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0461310.1021/acscatal.0c04613 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0262510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02625 ↗
28. 10.1039/C8SC00555A10.1039/C8SC00555A ↗
29. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0028010.1021/acscatal.9b00280 ↗
30. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0108410.1021/acscatal.0c01084 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c0575910.1021/acs.jpca.1c05759 ↗
32. 10.1002/qua.56033030510.1002/qua.560330305 ↗
33. Moulder J. F. · 1995
34. 10.1039/C7CS00777A10.1039/C7CS00777A ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.04610.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.046 ↗
36. 10.1002/smll.20170386010.1002/smll.201703860 ↗
37. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac1eb410.1149/1945-7111/ac1eb4 ↗