journal article·2022-04-25

Solution-Phase Intercalation of 2D Hybrid SGO in Sulfonated Poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide): Improved Electrochemical Properties and Electrodialytic Desalination Performance

Sarthak Mishra, Jeet Sharma, Nehal H. Rathod, Vaibhav Kulshrestha

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 5· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

This work investigates a strategy to overcome conventional trade-offs of long-range ionic conductivity in pristine sulfonated poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (SPPO-S) via solution-phase intercalation of synthesized hybrid sulfonated graphene oxide (hSGO) in an SPPO-S matrix. The hSGO nanocomposite was prepared via covalent functionalization of GO through facile silyl-oxy bond formation using 3-mercaptopropyl trimethoxy silane (MPTMS). A series of nanocomposite membranes (ShGO) with low (0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 wt %) to high (1.0, 2.0, 5.0 wt %) hSGO concentrations were fabricated, and the influence of hSGO on physicochemical and electromembrane transport properties was evaluated. XPS and ζ-potential measurements illustrated that the hydrophilic hSGO with a spacer-type trimethylene sulfonic acid [(−CH2)3–SO3H] moiety establishes a dynamic interaction via means of intermolecular H-bonding and short-range electrostatic interactions, respectively. With 0.5 wt % hSGO, the membranes showed excellent physicochemical attributes (i.e., IEC = 1.24 mequiv g–1 and WU = ∼44%) with improved ionic conductivity by ∼43% (i.e., κm = 1.92 × 10–2 S cm–1) in contrast to pristine SPPO-S (i.e., IEC = 0.98 mequiv g–1; WU = 37.12%; κm = 1.34 × 10–2 S cm–1). Chemical structures and phases were confirmed using NMR, FT-IR, XRD, XPS, etc. The i–V characteristics illustrated that the high Ilim1 of nanocomposite membranes alleviated the ion percolation and influenced the operational potential to a broader range for lower power consumptions (PCs) and higher current efficiencies (CEs). ShGO-0.5 showed PC as low as 1.04 kWh kg–1 and CE as high as ∼88% during electrodialytic brackish water desalination. In summary, the prepared membranes may be promising candidates for electrodialytic brackish water desalination with a high salt removal (≥93%) efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Membrane Separation Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research─Central Salt and Marine Chemical Research Institute, GB Marg, Bhavnagar, Gujarat 364002, India

Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002, India

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2021: Valuing Water; UNESC World Water Assessment Programme, 2021. ISBN-978-92-3-100434-6, 1-187 [428].
2. World data lab: Water scarcity clock (up to 2030), Duetsche Gesellschaft Fur Internationale Zusammenarbert. http://www.worldwater.io/ (accessed Oct 12, 2021).
3. 10.1016/j.desal.2020.11484410.1016/j.desal.2020.114844 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0748210.1021/acs.est.9b07482 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.desal.2021.11508910.1016/j.desal.2021.115089 ↗
6. 10.1002/pat.508610.1002/pat.5086 ↗
7. 10.3390/membranes1104024610.3390/membranes11040246 ↗
8. Strathmann H. · 2004
9. Sata T. · 2007
10. 10.1016/j.ces.2013.09.04710.1016/j.ces.2013.09.047 ↗
11. 10.1021/cr300115g10.1021/cr300115g ↗
12. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.04210.1016/j.desal.2014.10.042 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.04710.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.047 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.03010.1016/j.desal.2015.03.030 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.10810.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.108 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.05010.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.050 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.desal.2018.03.01810.1016/j.desal.2018.03.018 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4RA02216E10.1039/C4RA02216E ↗
19. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.00410.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.004 ↗
20. 10.1080/01496395.2014.97352510.1080/01496395.2014.973525 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.02710.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.027 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.05310.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.053 ↗
23. 10.1039/C9TA01891C10.1039/C9TA01891C ↗
24. 10.1039/D0EN00496K10.1039/D0EN00496K ↗
25. 10.1021/am504597a10.1021/am504597a ↗
26. 10.1002/pat.338510.1002/pat.3385 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0112810.1021/acsaem.0c01128 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11825910.1016/j.memsci.2020.118259 ↗
29. 10.1002/pat.71810.1002/pat.718 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.12910.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.129 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11903410.1016/j.memsci.2020.119034 ↗
32. 10.1295/polymj.27.17310.1295/polymj.27.173 ↗
33. 10.1002/app.2225710.1002/app.22257 ↗
34. 10.1021/am500050410.1021/am5000504 ↗
35. 10.1039/b820559k10.1039/b820559k ↗
36. 10.1016/j.desal.2020.11486810.1016/j.desal.2020.114868 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.08.00510.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.08.005 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.03010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.030 ↗
39. 10.1002/pat.85110.1002/pat.851 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10789010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107890 ↗
41. Akbari M. · Int. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2019 · 15 · 1
42. 10.1007/s11581-019-03218-810.1007/s11581-019-03218-8 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.02810.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.028 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.01310.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.00610.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.006 ↗
46. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa861510.1088/1361-6528/aa8615 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.08.01910.1016/j.cplett.2013.08.019 ↗
48. 10.1039/C4CC07273A10.1039/C4CC07273A ↗
49. 10.1039/C6NR03503E10.1039/C6NR03503E ↗
50. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.02710.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.027 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.desal.2019.11414510.1016/j.desal.2019.114145 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.01910.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.019 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11595-017-1737-010.1007/s11595-017-1737-0 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0140310.1021/acsomega.8b01403 ↗
55. 10.1039/C5RA07191G10.1039/C5RA07191G ↗