Metallic and Low-Work-Function PEDOT:PSS Cathodes for Flexible Organic Solar Cells Exhibiting Over 15% Efficiency and High Stability
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible organic solar cells (OSCs) with an inverted structure have the advantage of high stability against ambient air over normal flexible OSCs. However, inverted flexible OSCs with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) transparent electrodes and PM6:Y6 active layers have suffered from a limited power conversion efficiency (PCE) of no higher than 13.6% to date. Herein, we developed a simple room-temperature crystallization technology of PEDOT:PSS cathodes and then reported an inverted flexible OSC of the cathodes and PM6:Y6 of over 15% PCE. This PCE is the best result among the inverted flexible OSCs with the polymeric electrodes and PM6:Y6. The high PCE is attributed to the superior conductivity and low work function of the cathodes, which are beneficial for efficient electron transport and collections in the flexible devices. Moreover, the flexible OSCs maintained 93.2% and 82.7% of the initial PCE when exposed to nitrogen and ambient air for 45 days, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hubei Key Laboratory of Plasma Chemistry and Advanced Materials, Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Optoelectronic and New Energy Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo · Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/advs.20190081310.1002/advs.201900813 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20200939910.1002/adfm.202009399 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.18810.1038/nphoton.2013.188 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13301410.1016/j.cej.2021.133014 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20120533710.1002/adma.201205337 ↗
6. 10.1002/ente.20210059510.1002/ente.202100595 ↗
7. 10.1126/sciadv.160207610.1126/sciadv.1602076 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab83be10.1088/1361-6463/ab83be ↗
9. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0054010.1021/acsaem.0c00540 ↗
10. 10.1002/advs.20190149010.1002/advs.201901490 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.09.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2014.09.007 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20190847810.1002/adma.201908478 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0097010.1021/acsnano.9b00970 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20080033810.1002/adma.200800338 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20110479510.1002/adma.201104795 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20150007810.1002/adma.201500078 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.5b0283010.1021/acsami.5b02830 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.6b0138910.1021/acsami.6b01389 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20180007510.1002/adma.201800075 ↗
20. 10.1002/solr.20190054310.1002/solr.201900543 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8QM00614H10.1039/C8QM00614H ↗
22. 10.1039/D0TA11831A10.1039/D0TA11831A ↗
23. 10.1007/s40820-020-00566-310.1007/s40820-020-00566-3 ↗
24. 10.1039/D0TA07934K10.1039/D0TA07934K ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.5b0317110.1021/acsami.5b03171 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-019-09011-510.1038/s41467-019-09011-5 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.01010.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.010 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-020-18373-010.1038/s41467-020-18373-0 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.10640510.1103/PhysRevLett.109.106405 ↗
30. 10.1021/ma990567410.1021/ma9905674 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20040001610.1002/adfm.200400016 ↗
32. 10.3389/fchem.2021.80753810.3389/fchem.2021.807538 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.6b1634110.1021/acsami.6b16341 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41467-020-16509-w10.1038/s41467-020-16509-w ↗