Effect of Electrolyte Filling Technology on the Performance of Porous Carbon Electrode-Based Lithium-Oxygen Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Although the theoretical energy densities of lithium-oxygen batteries (LOBs) far exceed those of lithium-ion batteries, the practical values of the LOBs are usually much lower because of the use of large electrolyte excesses. Thus, to realize LOBs with a high practical energy density, the electrolyte amount should be minimized without compromising their performance. To address this challenge, we herein investigate the influence of several electrolyte filling techniques on the performance of LOBs, revealing that the battery discharge/charge profiles are strongly influenced by the uniformity of electrolyte distribution in the porous carbon electrode. The obtained results show the importance of electrolyte filling technology for realization of practical high-energy-density LOBs and facilitate their further development.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Green Research on Energy and Environmental Materials, National Institute for Material Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
NIMS-SoftBank Advanced Technologies Development Center, National Institute for Material Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
Advanced Technology Division, Technology Strategy Unit, Technology Unit, SoftBank Corp., 1-9-1 Higashi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-7317, Japan
Funding
National Institute for Materials Science · SoftBank Corp.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.183637810.1149/1.1836378 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.086311jes10.1149/2.086311jes ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0060910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0054510.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00545 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.05710.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.057 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.09.02910.1016/j.jechem.2019.09.029 ↗
7. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9bfd10.1149/1945-7111/ab9bfd ↗
8. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.794.1110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.794.11 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.04410.1016/j.procir.2015.12.044 ↗
10. 10.1002/ente.20180110810.1002/ente.201801108 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.1181807jes10.1149/2.1181807jes ↗
12. 10.1038/nchem.137610.1038/nchem.1376 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20160550010.1002/adfm.201605500 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.00410.1016/j.joule.2019.02.004 ↗
15. 10.1039/d0mh00067a10.1039/d0mh00067a ↗
16. 10.1149/2.0251903jes10.1149/2.0251903jes ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.03710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.037 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.08110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.081 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-019-03347-410.1007/s00170-019-03347-4 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0081814jes10.1149/2.0081814jes ↗
21. 10.1021/jz300243r10.1021/jz300243r ↗
22. 10.1002/anie.20110235710.1002/anie.201102357 ↗
23. 10.1021/jz200352v10.1021/jz200352v ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20171015610.1002/anie.201710156 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0221910.1021/acsnano.8b02219 ↗