Improving Electronic Conductivity of Layered Oxides through the Formation of Two-Dimensional Heterointerface for Intercalation Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Synthetic strategies for the improvement in electronic conductivities and electrochemical stabilities of transition metal oxide cathodes, which are limiting factors in the performance of commercial intercalation batteries, are required for next-generation, high-performance battery systems. The chemical preintercalation approach, consisting of a combined sequence of a sol–gel process, extended aging, and a hydrothermal treatment, is a versatile, wet synthesis technique that allows for the incorporation of a polar species between the layers of transition metal oxides. Here, formation of a layered 2D δ-CxV2O5·nH2O heterostructure occurs via chemical preintercalation of dopamine molecules between bilayers of vanadium oxide followed by the hydrothermal treatment of the precipitate, leading to carbonization of the organic molecules. The presence of carbon layers within the structure has been confirmed via a combined analysis of scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, four-probe conductivity measurements, and scanning transmission electron microscopy characterization. 2D δ-CxV2O5·nH2O heterostructure electrodes demonstrated significantly improved electrochemical performance, particularly at higher current densities, in Li-ion cells. The heterostructure electrodes exhibited 75% of the capacity retention when the current was changed from 20 mA g–1 (206 mAh g–1) to 300 mA g–1 (155 mAh g–1), while the reference δ-V2O5·nH2O electrodes exhibited only 10% capacity retention in the same experiment. Remarkably, 2D δ-CxV2O5·nH2O heterostructure electrodes demonstrated significantly improved capacity retention (94% after 30 cycles) for bilayered vanadium oxide electrodes in Li-ion cells during galvanostatic cycling at 20 mA g–1. The improved electrochemical performance, in both extended cycling and rate capability studies, of the 2D δ-CxV2O5·nH2O heterostructure electrodes in the Li-ion system is ascribed to the intermittent formation of carbon layers within the bilayered structure, which leads to increased electronic conductivity and improved structural stability of the heterostructure compared to the reference δ-V2O5·nH2O electrodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
Funding
Division of Materials Research
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/d41586-018-05752-310.1038/d41586-018-05752-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.04010.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja026143y10.1021/ja026143y ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0127810.1021/acsenergylett.7b01278 ↗
5. 10.5185/amlett.2017.153610.5185/amlett.2017.1536 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.09.00510.1016/j.ensm.2017.09.005 ↗
7. 10.1039/C6TA02917E10.1039/C6TA02917E ↗
8. Clites, M.; Pomerantseva, E. The Ion Dependent Change in the Mechanism of Charge Storage of Chemically Preintercalated Bilayered Vanadium Oxide Electrodes; SPIE: Low Dimensional Materials and Devices, 2017; Vol. 10349, p 9.10.1117/12.2275341 ↗
9. Clites, M.; Pomerantseva, E. Synthesis of Hybrid Layered Electrode Materials via Chemical Pre-Intercalation of Linear Organic Molecules; SPIE: Low Dimensional Materials and Devices, 2018; Vol. 10725, p 9.10.1117/12.2321263 ↗
10. 10.1039/c1cp21658a10.1039/c1cp21658a ↗
11. 10.1002/celc.20140239410.1002/celc.201402394 ↗
12. 10.1149/2.0711514jes10.1149/2.0711514jes ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.01.04010.1016/j.ssi.2018.01.040 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0245010.1021/acsnano.5b02450 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.005 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn405014d10.1021/nn405014d ↗
17. 10.1039/C5TA00502G10.1039/C5TA00502G ↗
18. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.8910.1038/nenergy.2017.89 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.aan828510.1126/science.aan8285 ↗
20. 10.1002/chem.20180516210.1002/chem.201805162 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20160283410.1002/aenm.201602834 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0011010.1021/acsenergylett.8b00110 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.02910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.029 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0852210.1021/acsnano.7b08522 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0717210.1021/acsnano.8b07172 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20171061610.1002/anie.201710616 ↗
27. 10.1039/C7TA09153B10.1039/C7TA09153B ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.5b1149210.1021/acsami.5b11492 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20160451910.1002/anie.201604519 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.8b1029910.1021/acsami.8b10299 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0209810.1021/acsaem.9b02098 ↗
32. Lakshminarayanan R. · 2018
33. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0275710.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02757 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.07.03210.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.07.032 ↗
35. 10.1021/nn300920e10.1021/nn300920e ↗
36. 10.1021/nn203869a10.1021/nn203869a ↗
37. 10.1021/cm00011a01810.1021/cm00011a018 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-018-04949-410.1038/s41467-018-04949-4 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.6b0275910.1021/acsami.6b02759 ↗