journal article·2019-09-23Open access

Investigation of the Effects of Copper Nanoparticles on Magnesium–Sulfur Battery Performance: How Practical Is Metallic Copper Addition?

Peng He, Hunter O. Ford, Laura C. Merrill, Jennifer L. Schaefer

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 2· Issue 9

Abstract

Rechargeable magnesium sulfur (Mg/S) batteries suffer from fast capacity fading, because of the difficulty with reoxidation of MgS and the polysulfide shuttle. Other works have reported that use of Cu current collectors at the cathode improves cyclability. Here, we investigate Cu nanoparticles grown on carbon nanofibers (Cu@CNF) as an additive for the Mg/S battery cathode to test the effects of Cu metal on capacity and rate performance at controlled Cu loading. The Mg/S battery with Cu additives can operate at 1 C with a capacity of 452 mAh/g after 100 cycles. It was confirmed via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy that Cu2S forms during cathode formation and contributes to the high initial capacity, but then converts back to metallic Cu. Upon extending cycling, the Cu additives promote the formation of smaller, more dispersed discharge product particles, thereby enhancing reversibility. Finally, it is found that the loading of S and Cu at the cathode must be low to achieve substantial and sustained benefits of the Cu additives.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems · Amazon Catalyst at ECS

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/am405619v10.1021/am405619v ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20140115510.1002/aenm.201401155 ↗
3. 10.1039/C5NR04383B10.1039/C5NR04383B ↗
4. 10.1039/c2ee03029b10.1039/c2ee03029b ↗
5. 10.1021/nl401668310.1021/nl4016683 ↗
6. 10.1039/c2ee22294a10.1039/c2ee22294a ↗
7. 10.1021/jz500691310.1021/jz5006913 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8EE01879K10.1039/C8EE01879K ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0171710.1021/acs.macromol.8b01717 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20170824110.1002/anie.201708241 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.162080911410.1073/pnas.1620809114 ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.5b0707110.1021/jacs.5b07071 ↗
13. 10.1039/c3ra43206h10.1039/c3ra43206h ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms143510.1038/ncomms1435 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0111110.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01111 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7EE02304A10.1039/C7EE02304A ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.5b0782010.1021/jacs.5b07820 ↗
18. 10.1149/2.1131712jes10.1149/2.1131712jes ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0900310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.14310.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.143 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8NR03375G10.1039/C8NR03375G ↗
22. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.06010.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.060 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41598-019-43639-z10.1038/s41598-019-43639-z ↗
24. 10.1002/ente.20180077710.1002/ente.201800777 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20180062410.1002/aenm.201800624 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.6b1036610.1021/acsami.6b10366 ↗
27. 10.1039/C5NR01861G10.1039/C5NR01861G ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20140022610.1002/aenm.201400226 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20130415610.1002/adfm.201304156 ↗
30. Ober, J. A. Mineral Commodity Summaries ; 2019.10.3133/70194932 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja305623m10.1021/ja305623m ↗
32. 10.1039/c002639e10.1039/c002639e ↗
33. 10.1038/srep1214610.1038/srep12146 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja308170k10.1021/ja308170k ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20170416610.1002/adma.201704166 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.180639410.1149/1.1806394 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20150155910.1002/adma.201501559 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20170431310.1002/adma.201704313 ↗
39. 10.1023/A:101915173117710.1023/A:1019151731177 ↗
40. 10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60380-X10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60380-X ↗
41. 10.1016/0368-2048(92)80047-C10.1016/0368-2048(92)80047-C ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apt.2016.08.02010.1016/j.apt.2016.08.020 ↗